Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so i am currently cutting the plugs off my factory injector loom and crimping/attaching new plugs for my id1000s.

im a sparky by trade so have no problems make new connections but im confused on polarity.

my id1000s are polarity sensitive and have + and - marked on the injector head at the corrosponding pins. in my factory loom i need to know if the common grey cable that is shared between all injectors the negative or positive???

is the single wire that is dedicated to each injector positive or negative?

i just cant remember if the injectors work on switched the earth or switching the active.

Edited by tm_r33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361941-injector-loom-help/
Share on other sites

just looking at some wiring diagrams now and it looks to me like the wire that is common between the 6 injectors is the + and the individual wire to each injector is -

(they work by the ecu switching off/on an earth)

????

sound right?

I had the same issue with my ID1000's, I asked the injector specialist and he told me not to worry as its just a coil with no reason to suggest a polarity on the plug as either way would energise it. I still wired them up as per the plug though and obviously have no issue.

Im temporarily running the stock turbo at the moment until my GTX comes this week and it idles perfectly on ethanol with the 1000's. :thumbsup:

yer sweet i wired them up with + in correct position but so hopefully no dramas. i wish they came with a patch loom like my haltech lol.

i hate make looms. im too anal so ive spent 8 hours on it today ( im still going) cause im just not quiet happy with how it looks on top of the motor so i keep changing it lol.

tape.... no tape.

split tubing...... no split tubing.

heat shrink..... no heat shrink.

combination of all of the above...... nar looks shit.

ill keep working away and post some high res pics of loom and loom on motor when im done.

cheers guys

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...