Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

we had an RB26 head rebuit, basically (it already had cams) to standard spec with new valve guides etc.

What would cause this:

post-12420-0-77239000-1304485272_thumb.jpg

As can be seen in the pic, there is a fragment gone from this cracked piece.

Something went through our rear turbo, which sent fragments back into cylinder 5 and scored the bore on our rebuilt forged N1 bottom end. The pic is of the front exhaust valve guide on cylinder 6. Our engine builder who will remain unnamed at this point claims to have never seen anything like it. What would be the opinion of people on here, is this crack from valve guide instalation of has the guide grabbed and travelled.

Also a valve seat on cylinder 5 has dislodged and is sticking below the chamber enough to catch my finger nail.

Is this just shoddy workmanship or something else?

we havent taken the engine back to them yet, and are considering taking it to another rebuilder to get their unbiased opinion. Can anyone recomend someone?

Any comments would be appreciated.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363074-rb26-engine-failure-whos-fault/
Share on other sites

engine ran for about 30 minutes, (mostly idling) I am well aware of what happens to ceramic turbo's. Yes these were ceramic. They are what done the damage to the engine for sure. but would this cracked/chipped piece around the valve guide be enough to take out the turbo, and is it the builders fault that it chipped off. since they rebuilt the head and replaced the valve guides? This engine basically got up to temperature idle, colled down, back up to temp & failure.

Even with 30 minutes use, this head should be brand new...

Same thing hapend to my rb26 engine. Fresh rebuild, had it going 3 days then broke a valve guide in No5 cylinder..

Massive job pulled the engine back out lifted the head.

The only damage It did was the bent inlet valve and broke the valve guide in no5.

In my case I just sent the cylinder head back to my engine builder who fixed it and returned it.

How bad is the bore and damage to top of piston? Pics?

I feel for you buddy hope you get it sorted under warranty

The turbine can't get back up into the cylinder unless it's peaking off it's ringer.

Is it possible you bounced off the limiter as it happened?

Also, the piece looks to be cracked but has not dislodged. If a piece came away and went through the turbo, then you could blame that piece, but that piece is still attached inside.

The valve seat could just be in the post casting. I have seen this many times before on standard ports. You won't know until you get the head off and inspect it properly.

Been there done that (twice).

1. Give your engine builder the "right of repair". If that fails (almost always)

2. Call Fair trading, lodge a form. Fair Trading will organise a mediation hook-up.

and then if that fails

3. PaY $600 FOR AN INDEPENDANT ENGINEERS REPORT. I Recommend Geoff Senz & Associates.

4. Once you have the report (and it identifies the cause and who is at fault) fill in this form http://www.cttt.nsw....hicles_Division

5. attend court and receive judgement.

PS. Claim all your costs plus the cost of Repair/Replace.

But give your engine builder first right of repair. You might have a decent guy.

Dont be intimidated or hoodwinked. Just follow these steps.

Edited by Sinista32

Been there done that (twice).

1. Give your engine builder the "right of repair". If that fails (almost always)

2. Call Fair trading, lodge a form. Fair Trading will organise a mediation hook-up.

and then if that fails

3. PaY $600 FOR AN INDEPENDANT ENGINEERS REPORT. I Recommend Geoff Senz & Associates.

4. Once you have the report (and it identifies the cause and who is at fault) fill in this form http://www.cttt.nsw....hicles_Division

5. attend court and receive judgement.

PS. Claim all your costs plus the cost of Repair/Replace.

But give your engine builder first right of repair. You might have a decent guy.

Dont be intimidated or hoodwinked. Just follow these steps.

Excellent advice. Also, make a handwritten log of everything you do and say including with times and dates. Include notes of what the builder says.

A= Do everything sinista said.

B= Never idle a brand new engine. As soon as it has started rotate the engine speed till it is warm and then work its ring out. I know many people don't beleive this method but i have used it on 5000hp plus diesel engines worth millions and works perfectly. Ive also used it on every small engine i have built same result. As elite said the turbo would not return back into the ports unless the engine was working which you said it was not. You wont know till you pull the head or do a boroscope to the engine.

There is a high possibility of a faulty assembly. I.e. Not enough lube on the valve stems, Incorrect valve guide install, contaiminets left in the manifold, head, cylinder, I have seen small filings go through an engine then take out the turbo before on very rare occasions.

Thanks Guys, Bottom end had been built early last year, was already ran in but car had not been driven much. on the day it failed the car got a few revs - 4-5000 after it went to the exhaust shop and had the exhaust modified, but definatly not rev limiter and only 3-4 sharp bursts to mentioned revs to hear it (and that was 4 hours before it occured)... then it drove next door to have a wheel alignment, then back on trailer, when it was taken off the trailer it idled away, turned it off. was started 10 mins later, and when selected reverse to move it a metallic noise was heard, engine dropped to 5 cyl and was shut down immediatly. was at not much above idle when that occurred.

Elite, the piece cracked has a small chip missing behind it. There are marks on other valve stems on other cylinders that look tight, and have scrape marks on them.

It is going back to the builder tomorrow, if he admits fault it will be left with him, if not i will have an independant inspection

Thanks for the help

Cheers

Thanks Guys, Bottom end had been built early last year, was already ran in but car had not been driven much. on the day it failed the car got a few revs - 4-5000 after it went to the exhaust shop and had the exhaust modified, but definatly not rev limiter and only 3-4 sharp bursts to mentioned revs to hear it (and that was 4 hours before it occured)... then it drove next door to have a wheel alignment, then back on trailer, when it was taken off the trailer it idled away, turned it off. was started 10 mins later, and when selected reverse to move it a metallic noise was heard, engine dropped to 5 cyl and was shut down immediatly. was at not much above idle when that occurred.

Elite, the piece cracked has a small chip missing behind it. There are marks on other valve stems on other cylinders that look tight, and have scrape marks on them.

It is going back to the builder tomorrow, if he admits fault it will be left with him, if not i will have an independant inspection

Thanks for the help

Cheers

Goodluck

There shouldn't be scrape marks on the valve stems. Sounds like someone owes you a rebuild (give or take). But if a simple thing like fitting valves was messed up then can you trust that your engine will be properly sorted? Good luck mate.

If there is scraping on the valve stems. There is a mechanical fault. Either not enogh lube on the valve stems for start up, Valve guides not lined up/ pressed incorrectly. Or possibly incorrect valve adjustment.

What exactly is that piece of debris in front of the valve stem. It looks like a piece of the port, as in aluminium that has been cracked away from the head casting when the stem was pressed in.

If it is aluminium, it is likely that this port isnt where your trouble started. I'd wager that some or most of the other ports would have similar damage, and possibly a few bits missing from around the ends of the valve stems. Im thinking the machinist used the wrong interference fit for the valve stems or incorrect assembly method to press the guides back into the head.

Elite, the piece cracked has a small chip missing behind it. There are marks on other valve stems on other cylinders that look tight, and have scrape marks on them.

A tight cylinder? Unless the machinist forgot to check the piston/bore clearances I doubt its the cylinders that were at fault. Im guessing colateral damage as a result of debris from the ports ended up causing the damage. I'd be pulling the valves from the head that marry up to the damaged cylinders and inspecting the ports and combustion chambers. Debris from the ports have probably hammered into the head and piston crowns in the quench pad area too.

Pictures of the combustion chambers for the damaged cylinders with the valves removed, and the damaged cylinders and pistons in the block will reveal more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...