Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Too many variables, eg.

* If a car with standard power hits the rev limiter in top gear (unlikely) then you can quadruple the horsepower, it will get there quicker, but will still not go any faster, because the motor is turning the same gearing as fast as it can.

* If we take the same car and with all of the engine work decide to rev it 1000rpm harder, so increase the rev limiter, it will go faster, but not because of the horsepower

* If the car however does not have the grunt to turn top gear to the limiter then more horsepower will make it faster.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805618
Share on other sites

I thought so, explains why Monaros are so slow!

my dad used to race his HG monaro (308 gts) @ ravenswood raceway back in the day....his fastest time was a 13.2, mildly worked making about 325rwhp....was running a 4.11 diff ratio.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805969
Share on other sites

my dad used to race his HG monaro (308 gts) @ ravenswood raceway back in the day....his fastest time was a 13.2, mildly worked making about 325rwhp....was running a 4.11 diff ratio.

haha. Mine had a HJ Monaro with a well worked 308 but 3.08s in the rear was good for 14sec. But fully loaded with a trailer would sit on 160km happy to do 200 fully loaded with no trailer

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805977
Share on other sites

haha. Mine had a HJ Monaro with a well worked 308 but 3.08s in the rear was good for 14sec. But fully loaded with a trailer would sit on 160km happy to do 200 fully loaded with no trailer

nice

my brothers 308 hg gts is running about 350rwhp and that ran a 12.9sec with slightly taller ratio than the 4.11

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5806011
Share on other sites

will a car acheive higher top end speeds with power alone or does gearing need to be changed to go faster..

Power:weight ratio determines low-speed acceleration (for a certain set of gear ratios).

Power:drag determines high speed acceleration/top speed (for a certain set of gear ratios). At a certain point wind resistance becomes so high that it relegates inertia due to mass to a relatively negligible amount when determining the maximums.

Speed is a factor of engine speed and gear ratio (in the gearbox and final drive) so the amount of power you're making does not have a direct relationship.

As others have said, if you're hitting the rev limiter in top gear with your existing power, all that adding more power is going to do is mean you will get to that speed in a shorter time.

However, if with your existing power you're not able to rev out top gear (which will be due to drag) then adding more power will increase your top speed. Of course, if adding more power meant increasing drag (say if you needed to open up the front of the car to get more air onto your heat exchangers) then your gains might not be as high as you'd first think.

One this topic, will shorter gearing give you faster acceleration, or will both cars accelerate at a similar pace? What's the advantage of short gears?

Shorter gears may give you faster acceleration. It depends on the situation. Shorter gearing will give you better acceleration in a certain gear, but note that your ground speed in that gear at a certain RPM will be lower. Whether its worth it or not is up to the conditions.

As an example, with the stock 3.5 FD in my car I'd be able to hold 3rd gear all the way around Wakefield after the main straight. With my new 3.9 I keep having to grab 4th and use about half its rev band (and then back into 3rd for some corners). Every time you change gear you decelerate while your engine is disconnected from your wheels, as drag and parasitic loss still act upon your car. Those extra gearchanges have actually cost me laptimes (both in terms of outright time and consistency) at Wakefield Park.

By the same token, at Eastern Creek where I was constantly making 3rd-4th interchanges. I should be able to avoid using 3rd so much now, and getting rid of those gearchanges should mean that I'm quicker at EC (I can't wait to get out there and find out, my Wakefield experiences have gotten me a bit annoyed at this FD).

My car also used to top out 4th gear at the end of the quarter. I'd pretty much hit the cutout just after crossing the line. With the shorter FD I'd now have to grab 5th. It's hard to say whether the extra in-gear acceleration is worth the trade-off on having to make the extra shift (and being more likely to wheelspin out the hole) but I'm suspecting I'm now a fraction slower.

Note that I've got a pretty close ratio box stock. On a car with long ratios, like Falcodores, shortening the FD is probably a good thing for acceleration in most circumstances.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5806036
Share on other sites

when talking top speed it isn't just about gearing. taller gearing can actually lower the top speed. i think it was the VR HSV GTS that had a top speed of 250kmh in 5th gear and only 217kmh in 6th because the gearing was too tall to overcome the wind resistance. very few cars on the road will actually hit the rev limiter in top gear in stock form. a lot would actually have higher top speeds with fractionally shorter gearing, but car companies don't worry about this sort of thing as they aim for top gear to rev in a nice fat torque range on the highway to give good fuel economy as well as stop you having to drop down gears at the slightest incline. top speed is all about overcoming air resistance and the faster you go the more it takes to go that little bit faster.

as for shorter gearing increasing acceleration, the short answer is yes. this is why first gear accelerates faster than 5th gear. a commodore or falcon with a shorter diff ratio will be much faster than a stock one in a drag race. first gear in an auto commodore (older 4 speed autos) is nearly the same as second gear in a manual skyline (once diff ratios are taken into account).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807026
Share on other sites

The first reply to the thread nailed it. Marc's post there has some pretty good information too.

It all depends on what you're aiming for. You set a goal, then you change all the variables to shoot for that goal. If I want to drag people to 100km/h I'll use the standard 4.11 diff in my Skyline because 2nd gear tops out around that and if it was any shorter I'd need another gear change, which will cost me time. If we're dragging to 80km/h I'll put a 4.36 in the car, because even though 2nd gear will now top out around 90-95, I only need 80 of that and the shorter ratio will give slightly better acceleration.

If you calculate it, a standard R33 GTS-T has the gearing to achieve ~277km/h (forget the exact figure). Realistically you'll only get to around 250 because you'll run out of torque. Shorten the diff a bit and you might get 255 thanks to the extra torque of the gearing. Shorten it too much and you'll only get 230 because your car will redline in top gear at this speed. Make it too tall (say 2.5:1) and you'll have a theoretical top speed of 400km/h+ with only enough torque to get to 160-170. But 1000hp behind that ratio and you'll propel the car to around 320. There are lots of variables to it all.

All hypotheticals for the purpose of examples^

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807229
Share on other sites

the wind resistance. very few cars on the road will actually hit the rev limiter in top gear in stock form. a lot would actually have higher top speeds with fractionally shorter gearing, but car companies don't worry about this sort of thing as they aim for top gear to rev in a nice fat torque range on the highway to give good fuel economy as well as stop you having to drop down gears at the slightest incline. top speed is all about overcoming air resistance and the faster you go the more it takes to go that little bit faster.

as for shorter gearing increasing acceleration, the short answer is yes. this is why first gear accelerates faster than 5th gear. a commodore or falcon with a shorter diff ratio will be much faster than a stock one in a drag race. first gear in an auto commodore (older 4 speed autos) is nearly the same as second gear in a manual skyline (once diff ratios are taken into account).

I never thought that I would change my opinion again, but your argument moved me in way that I've never known.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807415
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...