Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ahhaha yeah! we bag him (gtrxtc / the oak) a bit about it but he says he didn't put the badge there himself :rofl:

he not going to be happy about this thread either hahaha

i'd connect to irc and laugh but i changed my nick to 'muzza' and now i'm banned from irc :rofl:

also notice that gtr is in " " :rofl:

some1's going to be admitted into hospital with a nice shrapnel wound the shape of a GTR badge in there head soon...lol...what happened to good ol common sense and being happy with what your car is! i still dont know y people try mock things up...it destroys the good name of the cars they mock up...

No - the best I've seen is a car that is (was?) for sale somewhere on parramatta road. We were car hunting and the badge caught my eye - as we got closer it was obvious the car wasn't a GTR. As we got even closer it was obvious that the GTR badge was about 15-20 degrees off vertical. Idiot.

when will GTR wannabes end

... No offence to anyone but if you cannot respect a GTS-25t or GTS for what it is then why do you bother buying it? slapping on a GTR bodykit and badge dsen't make them go fast you know?

althought a gtr badge is worse, why didn't swoop get any flack for having a nur badge on his r34 gtr? besides the badge, sticker and maybe the clips the actual car is very nice. i'm waiting for the mofo to come online so he can see this har har har.

and he doesn't have to make any excuses for owning a gtst.

but i aint arguing. i don't endorse fake badging - just presenting another example.

i uploaded the shots because he asked me to. and i labeled it "GTR"JET... when he said 'wtf? u mofo why put gtr in " " ?' i told him 'it's a skyline forum, you're not fooling anyone' to which he replied with 'fair enough'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Totally equivalent. Stock often goes from the comp cover because that's where the actuator is also installed and the factory needs 2" of hose to make the connection - and it comes as a pre-assembled unit. They totally have a boost reference from somewhere between the turbo and the throttle(s). Oh, jeez. Just do it in M12 then. We don't actually care that much. I would expect any such AN converter fitting to rely on an o-ring or some other seal onto a flat surface under the flange of the hex**, because bolt threads are no intended to provide a pressure seal. unlike..... pipe threads. **which also requires a suitably flat and smooth surface on the turbo's boss to provide the seal.
    • I also used NP   That’s were it’s seems to be the best place to fit it? All schematic shows also that it’s should be referenced from the turbo housing. But idk, I do see high hp cars without any connection or anything to their turbos, so I really don’t know how they connect their things
    • I do have loctite 243 and 246 and a few more models. I could drill it now in place and make new threads for m12 and order an4 - m12 coupling and fit that to the turbo. Run a braided hose to the EBC which I could get a an4 to 1/8npt 
    • So M12 and sealant should be fine?    NPT ” because that’s what I had and what I could get atm. 
    • Wouldn’t touch par if they gave it to me. You need to ask how much power you’re looking to make and then add about 50% to it because that’s what you’ll end up making  The factory box says no more at about 350kw or so, the upgraded synchro boxes won’t handle much over 500kw for long and at that point you’re looking at an auto or dog engagement manual,  once you’ve gone dog engagement you may as well go sequential, they cost a little bit more but it’s worth it  also while you’re at it you should upgrade the transfer case with 10 friction plates 
×
×
  • Create New...