Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With RB coil packs, the iron-core stack's black coating always ends up coming off / wearing away to some degree (under the bolt heads esp., plus eventually some is always pulled away by the mounting brackets when you remove the coils). Obviously this leads to a direct conductive contact with the aluminium bracket frame, and in turn all the rest of the coil packs. Does anyone know weather this can somehow reduce the strength of the coil, and/or contribute to misfire?, perhaps by encouraging a short to earth?

post-19705-0-72626300-1306142106_thumb.jpg

when that black coating comes off, the core ring metal comes directly in contact with the bare surface of the single-piece aluminum bracket; either on the underside, or by a conduction path down the bolt itself into the bracket thread.

where's the insulation?

I dont think its an issue. Research how a coil pack works. I don't really think 0.1mm of paint is going to insulate 5,000 volts. My coil packs have nearly no paint on them and its been fine for 30,000kms.

I understand how they work, and I'm pretty sure the voltage in the secondary winding is higher than that

but weird things do happen- in that pic, you can see the lighter discoloured section on the side of the coil pack where an arc has been jumping to the bracket rail that runs along the side of the coil. both the coils (all of them) and the rail end up with carbon marks from that.

I've taped the replacement coils and the bracket rails on both sides to try and increase the resistance to spark-over between them, but it still hasn't completely eliminated the (fairly) occasional misfire

where the heck is the spark energy escaping to?

Pretty sure the mounting bracket is insulated from the coil itself so there is no issue with that.

Correct. The metal core is not connected to either of the solenoids inside (unless its stuffed), so it wont be carrying any current, so it doesnt matter if its got paint on it or not. A thin layer of paint wouldnt be effective against high tension anyway.

EDIT: actually if the core was grounded against the mounting braket then it might well be an attractive place for the current to go.

Whatever - just insulate the best you can where its arcing.

Your coil pack is probably buggered, There could be alot of other reasons for the miss as well. And as MrStabby and i both said paint would not be able to stop the current if your coil was earthing threw the mounting frame.

Your coil pack is probably buggered

these ones don't have the external signs of that kind of shorting, but obviously that's not to say they are tip-top

the annoying thing is you can hear a spark jumping to earth at idle every few seconds, but with the coil-cover off and in the dark, I still can't see where it's going to :/

I have never cut one open.

But they will be insulated internally. The bracket on the outside will be part of the insulation and therefore not pass a current from the coil to the bracket.

Simple fact is, as said, a thin layer of paint would not stop 10,000+V from jumping from the coil pack to the bracket in the first place, and I dont think they would have designed it like this

There is an earth cable that bolts to one of the rear bolts that holds the bracket down, this may be there to drain any voltage that does manage to escape to the bracket.

you can see the insulation- all that injected resin that encases the windings around the bakelite(?) sheath that the core runs through.

haven't seen the earth cable you mention on mine (S2 type RB25 with the igniter built into the coil pack), but I'll have a good look back there tomoz.

maybe someone didn't reconnect it ages ago and I've failed to notice it. fairly sure not, but I'll check either way

I guess the next thing to try is to find some very thin plastic washers to go between the coil and brackets, plus underneath the split washers of the bolts

I dont think that's going to help. Have you gone crazy with electrical tape/silicon/sikaflex/whatever to get some insulation into the air gap where the arcing is occurring?

If there is a problem with arcing to the core, putting plastic washers will just make it arc to the bracket instead IF they are effective in insulating the core from the bracket, which I doubt.

I think the fundamental problem is the breakdown of the insulation around the solenoids. The core to bracket is a side issue.

Might be worth checking the solenoids with a multimeter. If they're not within spec, then you'd be better off with new coils, because you cant fix that. If they're ok then persist with the insulation.

the temps might be a bit of an issue, but you could try wrapping the coils in a feather weight bike tube (0.6mm thick rubber). that would certainly stop any arcing from the main body to the bracket or rocker cover, but won't stop any internal arcing that is then being grounded through the bolts.

ok, sweet

what should I set the multimeter range to, and which pins on the coil plug do I test and what sort of readings should come back?

Dunno. On the previous generation coilpacks primary winding (where the power is switched in) its 0.6 to 0.9 ohms, middle and left pin when looking at coil plug. Yours will be different - i'm guessing you might not be able to check the primary winding unless you can power up the ignitor..... hmm mightn't be worth the trouble unless you can find the proper check procedure out of the workshop manual. The insulation fix is cheap so maybe just get that sorted and see how the coils go.

I've already bombed the coils and the bracket rails with 100mph cloth tape, which did help somewhat

Unless you can confirm it insulates electrically, rip it off and use a branded electrical tape. I've bought Nitto branded japanese made tape from Jaycar. Good stuff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...