Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its not about what I like or dont like, I didnt vote for them. Jay Weatherill or Mike Rann, its just same shit, different bucket.

I guess I'm just curious about what you think is going to happen with exsisting legislation (derived from policies) with a liberal government, my bet is nothing.

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Which policies don't you like?

Don't like the New hospital, Spend 3 billion in the existing hospital and you would get a better outcome.

Don't like the Super express way, complete waste of $950,000,000.

Don't like the tram extension, Supposed to service AAMI Stadium, but by the time it gets there the footy will be played at Adelaide oval.

I don't even agree with the Adelaide oval redevelopment, i think they are ruining what was a historic cricket ground.

On a side note, i just got myself one of these;

4e1c118a48e84e5b8a7d2fe5767f2254-htc-sensation.jpg

dale,

the hospital needs to be ditched. the old one is bad, my partner works there and its a nightmare..

trams, expressway, oval is all bullshit.

we cant fill aamii stadium and they built all the bus lanes etc.. such a waste, and adelaide oval is looking more and more like shit.

dale,

the hospital needs to be ditched. the old one is bad, my partner works there and its a nightmare..

trams, expressway, oval is all bullshit.

we cant fill aamii stadium and they built all the bus lanes etc.. such a waste, and adelaide oval is looking more and more like shit.

In regards to the hospital the new one was much needed. RAH is just too frickin old. As with the everything else this government has taken on is a blatant waste of money. I went to the Adelaide Sevens earlier this year and no one wanted to sit in the new grand stands. Everyone that I knew wanted to sit in the chappel stands lol.

Superway is a joke, i work right next to it and its painful!! limited access around Wingfield, and its gonna be like this if not worse for the next 3 years!

3 years - Jebus

Superway is a joke, i work right next to it and its painful!! limited access around Wingfield, and its gonna be like this if not worse for the next 3 years!

Mate feel your pain, i work on cormac road and have to try to avoid it all at all costs.....

I disagree about the Superway - yes it is a pain now, but when it is done it will free up one of the worst peak hour intersections immensely. Next they need to fix how the turning lanes from Grand Junction onto Port Wakefield Road work (they need 2 turning lanes) .... and then fix the Bridge Road/Grand Junction Road corner. Noth of these intersections are part of the recent new truck ring route, but both have had no regard paid to the massive increase in truck and pasenger car traffic - especially since most are coming/going on the Nexy.

But yes, last I heard the idiots in power want to make the exciting RAH site (once demolished) an open park - ffs the city is ringed by parklands .... why not just demolish the existing RAH completely and build the new one there. Imagine how much cheaper it would be not to have to reclaim the train track land and build suspended a concrete slab over it. Insanity. And watch them blow out the budget for it by triple by the time they are done.

It wasn't originally supposed to go there though. And i would say that the section between Pym St and Grange road is worse and the section past castle plaza is even worse again.

The project (express-way) was originally supposed to go between Pym st section and Grange road to reduce the issues that that section has (power line next to the road and the pavment needing to be redone anyway, etc) that is why the 950 mil budget was given. They discovered later that there was a sub station that wasn't going to be moved which basically put an end to it the original location, but rather than scrap the project because it wasn't going to achieve it's original goal, they moved it up the road where it isn't needed.

And what they are going to achieve now is that they are going to make the original problem worse because they are speeding up the traffic to the original problem area.

when i was looking they were about to release the 4g. that was 2 weeks ago. so wuld have been out by now..

i would have got it but im with optus!

and steve i watched that yesterday when i signed up to xda... LOL

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...