Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Agree with most of what has been posted on here.

Property should be considered a long-term investment, and as such you have to be prepared to ride out the bad times (such as those at the moment)

But for those looking for the silver lining; remember these times, when the market was bad, this could be the time to invest, and sell (if you have to) when the market is at its peak. I'm sure that in 20 years many of us will look back and say "if only I had 100k to invest in the 20teens, there were some great bargains then. (but you have to be able to carry the debts through the bad times)

As with any investment, some will be better than others. You need to pick the right property at the right price in the right area. Some people can make a fortune being . There will always be a huge rental market at the bottom end of the socio-economic spectrum, because these people will never be able to afford to buy, and they have to live somewhere.

Others pick the right area just before it booms, or buy in an area that later becomes popular and allows for subdivisions (think Prospect 20 years ago, some great bargains)

There are some real disadvantages to building in SA with our land tax, so large portfolios are not very attractive.

I have a reasonable portfolio of investment properties, and have been able to leverage these to get a home and acreage I would otherwise never have been able to afford, so it can work.. (but there have been tough times along the way)

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I thought I would bump this to see if anybody had anything new to add.

Im looking to buy early/mid next year in the under 300k range. I may or may not live in the property depending on what financially works better for me and where the house is located. After 5 years I will be buying a different property in which I hope to live long term, and after 8 years the original property would be fully paid off.

Note these are all loose comments and estimates, but open to hear what people have to say. Where would you buy? What do you look for in a property?

I like the idea in theory Jin Man, but the concept of paying off a $300k house in 8 years is way off base. Just the loan repayments on say a $280,000k loan are $21,000 per annum, then you want to cut $35,000 off the principal per year also? And don't rely on rent, as on a $300k house you would be lucky to get $300 per week = $15,000 p.a but then you have to take out management fees, repairs, vacancy time - it is not as blue sky as some people make out. You also have to factor in maintenance, legal costs, water rates, land tax etc in all of that too - until you own a house you have absolutely no concept of how much it actually costs to own, run and maintain a home.

But hey, aim high - you have nothing to lose. :D - you definitely have the right idea in concept.

on my rental i have in Roxby atm at a minimum ive had to allow an extra 1/3 on top of repayments for all those little things that Andrew said. Dont think you will have no maint issues etc as if you dont have money put away for these little things you will have big problems.

For that sort of money you'll get a small newish home 30km south of the CBD (around Huntfield Heights) or 25km north of CBD will get you an old trust home (around Salisbury/Elizabeth)

Bingo, fairly much the exact places I have been looking, but were would you buy if it was you?

Financially, I have everything under well control, I haven't worked since I was 14 for nothing.

I also think that living in a house before renting it out reduces what you will spend in maintenance when you do rent it. Items are always going to break, interest rates are never going to just disappear and rent is not an income, its a bonus to put towards your loan. Surely if you keep these things in mind there isnt too much that could go wrong.

What are peoples views on apartments vs houses?

until you own a house you have absolutely no concept of how much it actually costs to own, run and maintain a home.

Agree to that

Currently bumped my repayments up so i pay 6weeks repayments every 4weeks.

I figure a little bit of pain now will pay off in the long run

Good work there Nick! We used to do that, but with Carolyn off work with little Scarlett and my work being quiet (change of company and quiet market in general) we have backed off to the minimum payments .... I workout out that from our $3k-odd monthly mortgage payment $2,900 or so of that is the interest :( :( :(

Good work there Nick! We used to do that, but with Carolyn off work with little Scarlett and my work being quiet (change of company and quiet market in general) we have backed off to the minimum payments .... I workout out that from our $3k-odd monthly mortgage payment $2,900 or so of that is the interest :( :( :(

similar to what i was paying, $100 off the loan and the rest going towards the interest.

Its restricting me in going out, which is a pain after all I don't have a wife or kids yet :P but luckily i have a job that allows me to hit the town every now and again :thumbsup:

speaking of which need to catch up for a beer some time, I see someone is getting a year older next week....

Good work there Nick! We used to do that, but with Carolyn off work with little Scarlett and my work being quiet (change of company and quiet market in general) we have backed off to the minimum payments .... I workout out that from our $3k-odd monthly mortgage payment $2,900 or so of that is the interest :( :( :(

WOW!!

Hence why Jin_Man is looking for a cheaper property.

I draw a reasonable income from the Company but even so (if I had a mortgage) repayments like that would be the death of me >_<

I thought I would bump this to see if anybody had anything new to add.

Im looking to buy early/mid next year in the under 300k range. I may or may not live in the property depending on what financially works better for me and where the house is located. After 5 years I will be buying a different property in which I hope to live long term, and after 8 years the original property would be fully paid off.

Note these are all loose comments and estimates, but open to hear what people have to say. Where would you buy? What do you look for in a property?

If your going to rent the house out its best not to pay it off as then the house will have no tax benifits. Best to use the money to invest in buying another house and renting that out and so on.

Sorry I have to completely disagree there Ryan .... tax benefits are only useful if you have bucketloads of income. And even then, in saving 40% tax, you are still losing 60%. Always better to have an asset fully paid off, no matter what.

yeah it's the old "pay $2 to save $1" (negative gearing).....not very sound investing.........very long term proposal

I've always tried to make my investments earn me "$2 for every $1 spent" (positive gearing).........makes you money straight away.....much harder these days unfortunately

Hmmm just got my statement in the main...

originally took a 30yr loan one year ago when i bought the unit, and due to increasing my repayments the current loan period left is 14yr's 9 months!

cant wait to see how much further its reduces with the increased payments again :thumbsup:

Amazing what a little bump can do eh Nick?

simple things like changing monthly repayments to weekly can also save you bucket loads in the long run!

just check out the calculators..http://www.banksa.com.au/personal/home-loans/tools/home-loan-calculators/repayments

on a 300k mortgage, you save around 100k in interest over the life of the loan

Edited by Tommmo

simple things like changing monthly repayments to weekly can also save you bucket loads in the long run!

just check out the calculators..http://www.banksa.com.au/personal/home-loans/tools/home-loan-calculators/repayments

on a 300k mortgage, you save around 100k in interest over the life of the loan

Damned straight! That's why I pay my mortgage weekly. Any little trick you can use to help you out you've gotta go for it; every cent helps

yeah it's the old "pay $2 to save $1" (negative gearing).....not very sound investing.........very long term proposal

I've always tried to make my investments earn me "$2 for every $1 spent" (positive gearing).........makes you money straight away.....much harder these days unfortunately

If you can positive gear that is great but prepare for the government to dip their hand in, in taxes. Especially if you are already earning a decent amount. I have balanced both scenarios and it all comes down to the individual, what you earn, what the property/s make... etc.

It is true... every cent or dollar counts; including each one from the sale of my GTR :( time sell so I can be in more debt... :wacko:

Damned straight! That's why I pay my mortgage weekly. Any little trick you can use to help you out you've gotta go for it; every cent helps

agreed,

although i don't get out as much I would prefer to know that I'm eating into the mortgage on my place.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...