Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering what everyones heart rate is when at moderate training and at maximum effort

If im doing a 5KM run @ 9.5KM thats a moderate run for me. My heart rate will sit at about 160

At full tilt with sweat pouring off my face at 100% my heart rate would be about 195. For me this is a 5km run at about 12.5 KMS.

21 Years of age =)

Data taken from my heart rate monitor for my last run (5.33km, 12.3 km/h 26mins 3.5sec) tells me my average heart rate for the run was 168, with a max of 179. That's probably an 80-90% work out for me at my current fitness. At the start of the year I managed to get my heart rate over it's theoretical max, but being 35 years old it's not that hard to do lol.

While it's good to know your workout heart rate to make sure you are in the right zone, 2 things that I think are just as important as your workout heart rate are your resting heart rate and how long it takes for you to get back down to a resting rate after your workout. For example my resting heart rate is about 70, and within 5 mins of the end of a run my heart rate has gone from 180ish at the end of the run back down to about 100.

  • 2 weeks later...

my resting heartrate which gets tested every 3 months when i give blood is 51-53. when i used to smoke my resting rate was around 70. the only time i have tested my heartrate during exersize was on a treadmill after quitting smoking at around 70-80%. would be up around 160 in no time at all and my chest would be on fire.

Running with interval between 10kmh and 13kmh I hit about 170 and gain 1bpm per km I run...max I'd possibly hit though is 178

Normal resting is 58bpm, but if I relax can drop it 50 easy

  • 4 weeks later...

220-age gives max heart rate (MHR), max heart rate - resting heart rate (RHR) gives you heart rate reserve (HRR), to find training heart rate (THR) is (hrr x training percentage/100) plus resting hr

eg. Resting hr is 54, age is 23

MHR is 220-23 = 197

HRR is 197-54 = 143

50% THR is (143x.5)+54 = 125.5

Using that is a good way to set training intensity goals for a cardio workout eg. Warmup 40-60%, session intervals of 50-80% cooldown 60-40%. I have the intensity guidelines for muscular endurance, strength and hypertrophy (increase size) if anyone is interested in those. I agree with what emtea said, pay attention to how long it takes to get back down to normal, adequate recovery time will allow you to train at higher intensity for longer :-)

Trozzle, let me write you a program :-) lol I need PT Guinnea cops for my last assessment

haha I would Mel, but I'm in the gym for aesthetics - size, and some strength. Not to lose fat or build stamina....lol so I'm already following something Birds has done up for me.

When I wanna get my fitness back up to where it was, I'll hit you up perhaps :P

  • 3 months later...

220-age gives max heart rate (MHR), max heart rate - resting heart rate (RHR) gives you heart rate reserve (HRR), to find training heart rate (THR) is (hrr x training percentage/100) plus resting hr

eg. Resting hr is 54, age is 23

MHR is 220-23 = 197

HRR is 197-54 = 143

50% THR is (143x.5)+54 = 125.5

Shame about it having no basis in science. Using Karvonen gives it a little individuality but it can be off by +/- 20 bpm or more.

But you probably have to use it.

  • 2 months later...

I'm 23, last night my HR running on an incline at 10.5 km/h reached 190,

For the flat it sits at 180-182 at the same speed.

Resting this morning it was 57 BMP

In the gym it has so far peaked at 213.... which is kind of not what that calculation says :unsure: So I don't know what my MHR is yet! Just going to wait until I pass out :turned:

Whoops... just realised this is an old thread -_-

Edited by JEPPE

My heart rate is high in the rev range (from the heart rate monitor on the treadmill and eliptical trainer).

I'm probably rated as "un-fit"

Going hard I can easily reach 185bpm. Going all out I've hit 200bpm - with sweat gushing from every pore.

Heart rate is usually at the gym is around 175~180bpm

My work colleague is much bigger than me (obese) but much more fit hits only 150bpm, barely breaks a sweat.

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...