Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I really doubt it will make any positive difference. Porting is usually for when you are making massive power and need the extra flow, you don't do it for low down response. For low down response you'd be better off making a custom intake manifold with massive long intake runners, or increasing the stroke, but as mentioned before once you spend any money this project becomes stupid and you should have just invested it into an rb25/30.

i'll only be assembling the engine myself all the head work and machining will be done by professionals some of dad's old mates from when he drag raced and i've got a couple of heads and yeah was gonna try with both and see what happens and how much of a difference it makes..

Guys I dont see why its sooo hard to understand there are many ways to port heads. One way is like everyone is talking about, just make the ports as big and open as you can, but this is not the best with every head and every setup. I have seen plenty of motors gain lots of power and response from head work, now when I say head work I dont mean every head had the same kind of work done, it depended on the setup and how the stock head looked and flowed. Some heads you can gain 20+ whp with just a small reshape, some need to have the ports opened up, some gain more by just a small clean up, It depends on the setup and how the ports are shaped. Looking at the stock rb20 ports I can tell you a SMALL amount of porting at the mouth, port matching to the manifold, and just smoothing the ports out should work wonders all over the power band. This will not drop air speeds, infact it should speed the air up a little. Add to this, making sure the head has the right cross sectional area for the size of the motor and the head will be a ton better then stock.... Just my .02

This is going to be my setup, stock redtop block (eccs), silvertop head, rb25 late neo turbo, front facing plenum on cleaned up runners silvertop runners, 440cc injectors, stock fuel rail, stock tb, rom tune, and an adjustable fuel pressure regulater.

I am thinking ( I have not used a micrometer yet) I will need to open the mouth of the intake side just a little, not enough to slow down the flow. Then I am going to clean up the ports and the port throught ( right where the port dumps into the cyl). On the exhaust, I think the best way to go for my setup will be just a good clean up and polish. I will port match both sides (in/ex), and may take a small amount out of the exhaust side. I cant take much out of the ex side, but the easier it is to get the gases out the better at high speeds the better. I really think the stock head is super restictive, and has lots of room for improvment. I will know more when I can get a micrometer and figure out the stock cross sectional area of the ports, this will help me figure out how much I need to open the intake ports to keep the motor from choking itself. This is what most people forget when they port heads, but cross sectional area is most importent.

Hope this helps understand what I plan on doing, and maybe gives you an idea about how to do yours.

I'm surprised his thread is still alive. I look forward to all the porting and pulling over this head you do.

Instead of going quiet about it when you do realize it was a complete waste of time, money, and your life, please cone back and admit it.

$1100 and you could probably find a GTR head. $50 more and you have a rb30 block.

But you'd still spend or waste so much time on a rb20 and say it's better or different. Lol.

I will not be doing a before test, but I am sure there are plenty of stock rb20s running around with the other bits I will have. So we can use them as a basline....lol.

It costs $40 to run it up on a local dyno before hand, we all want to see the before/after results!

It costs $40 to run it up on a local dyno before hand, we all want to see the before/after results!

Mafia I am not in Aus so your prices are void for me. It would cost about 4-5k to buld a 30, and thats just the motor and turbo stuff. I then have to buy something to tell it what to do and have it tuned. Bringing the build up to about 5-6k depending on the cost of the motor, tune, and ecu. I just dont have that kind of money.....

Only reason I am not doing a before/after is cause the motor is not in my car, nor has it been in my car before. I would have ran it on the dyno for a baseline, had the motor been running in my car. I mean the only reason its getting a bit a head work is cause I have to change the valves. I mean why not clean up the ports a bit if your there in first place? Its not like I am going to spend 2k on this....lol.... My head work is going to be free, well as free as my time is anyway. I am not going to keep saying the same stuff over and over, so I will ust wait to update when I have started porting........

You should pick up some decent gains if you clean up the bowl and throat area. A good 5 or 6 angle valve seat job will help a buttload. Actually anything will be a help over the std 3 angle.

I wouldnt port match your exhaust side. Just do the inlet side. You want the exhaust manifold to be larger then the port exit. You need something to help reduce exhaust reversion, having that step left where the manifold meets the head, Thats about as much as you can do. So match your manifold to the gasket and thats all you need.

But for $50-$100 bux you can pick up a porting kit with the cartridge rolls and stones and then go yourself. Just cleaning up, removing casting lines and machine overlap everywhere, blend it all in so there are smooth transitions and no sharp edges. Should be good. Thats all I did to my rb25 head and ive got the flow figures. But i need to get a stock head flowed to see what improvement ive made. I picked up about 5-10cfm throughout the range just from the better valve seat job over standard 3 angle. That was suprising. Just a few more transitions and suddenly air flows easier out the valve.

You should pick up some decent gains if you clean up the bowl and throat area. A good 5 or 6 angle valve seat job will help a buttload. Actually anything will be a help over the std 3 angle.

I wouldnt port match your exhaust side. Just do the inlet side. You want the exhaust manifold to be larger then the port exit. You need something to help reduce exhaust reversion, having that step left where the manifold meets the head, Thats about as much as you can do. So match your manifold to the gasket and thats all you need.

But for $50-$100 bux you can pick up a porting kit with the cartridge rolls and stones and then go yourself. Just cleaning up, removing casting lines and machine overlap everywhere, blend it all in so there are smooth transitions and no sharp edges. Should be good. Thats all I did to my rb25 head and ive got the flow figures. But i need to get a stock head flowed to see what improvement ive made. I picked up about 5-10cfm throughout the range just from the better valve seat job over standard 3 angle. That was suprising. Just a few more transitions and suddenly air flows easier out the valve.

Thanks for the constructive input.

I really didnt plan on doing much to the exhaust beyound a clean up. I am still thinking on the valve job, we will have to see how much the shop here wants to charge....

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...