Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys looking for some opinions to help me make a decishion i have loved skylines for year and at the end of this year i will finally be able to get my first skyline but only an N/a due to restrictions on licencing do i start off with an na and build my way up doing suspenshion mods and minor perfomance or wait and get a factory turbo

TLDR p plate na modify and convert will i be disapoint with result?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/369474-na-to-turbo-heart-break-or-hero/
Share on other sites

NA skylines defs not worth it, i have one and kinda regret it, always wanting more power out of it wish i could have a turbo and run boost and keep increasing boost! i recommend if it's not urgent, get a R32 GTR or a R34 GTT and mod it up in your garage, strip it again and again understand it more, then once u hit your fulls just drive it everywhere knowing the car u know and understand inside and outside!

hey mate years ago i bought a n/a from a deakership, but after purchusing i was informed that the n/a block wouldnt support a turbo even though they are same block....not sure if its a myth maybe u should think about doin what grey said or buy the n/a and buying gtst front cut to installl in it later

Have a chat to Aggroman (Dave). He took his NA 34 and when he got off his P's he did a turbo conversion with great results. Mind you, he's an absolute wiz with a wrench but worth have'n a chat to him.

due to the different compression between the turb and na engine to turbo it you would have to change the pistons to turbo ones. Ive read that you can use the n/a pistons but you can only boost it to the bare min.

I am in this situation too. i am throwing up doing a rb25det swap into my 32, a rb20det swap or just selling the car and buying a turbo after i get off my P's.

I am leaning towards selling it as its alot of work to get the N/a up to the same level as a stock standard turbo.

if i were you i would hold off and just buy a turbo, when they say N/a skylines are slow THEY MEAN IT !! haha

Half the na section is on this topic, and of the hundreds of people on here who have done the na+t conversion I have only read of very few who haven't regretted it after a few years. IF you're going to do all the work yourself it won't be too dramatically expensive, but it's still wasted money and effort compared to buying a factory turbo skyline. And it's no small job, the easiest option is to put an rb25det in the car and that involves changing the ecu (and wiring loom i believe?).

Also STRONGLY recommend a defensive drivers course if you're going to be driving a rwd with no traction control. There's really no downside to learning more techniques about safe driving, and you may have seen that there's plenty of accident damage on sau. It might seem like a waste of time to some people, but sometimes a split second is all you have in an emergency and if you don't react properly you could be wishing you'd taken that driving course while getting your car towed away... Or maybe just hoping you'll be able to walk again one day.

I didnt bother reading it all and CBF writing a massive essay so ill break it down

It can be done, its not hard at all

manifolds bolt up fine, dont need to change pistions thats crap.. Plenty of cars run 10:1 Comp

GTT aftermarket ECU's work, I run A PFC in mine. (secret quirrel trick to get rid of engine check light as GT's dont have traction control, dont know what that is? google it. Its what the stagea ppl do as they have hte same problem any good workshop cna do it). You can also run standard ECU with a piggyback to handle fuel etc like a Greddy Emanage Ultimate with the Ignition Harness thats sold seperately (required for r34 only)

The only parts that you cant get off the shelf are turbo water/oil lines they need to be custom (easy as) everything else matches up fine. except for a plazmaman plenum you will need GTT runners

So long as you have enough exhaust flow boost isnt an issue, Im pushing 250KW atm with standard motor, highflow turbo (at 14psi) and supporting mods and will be up to 300-350 with a turbo change.

Budget 4-5K if you are going to give it to a workshop to install and tune. Parts will set you back roughly 3.5K depending on computer choice.

The 25DE Neo motors are tough as nails so dont worry about throwing a rod unless you service your car poorly..

Wanna see how one goes? Come to the Texi in September and watch me..Or just look at my sig below :P

Do it.

Check out these two threads, might help you decide:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/33407-how-to-turbo-your-na/

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/249186-nat-power-results-na-t-turbo-conversions-only/

I've done the same thing, and am very happy with the results.

Started out with a stock car, did all the suspension work, put in a good stereo which is a bit more of a hobby than anything, and heaps of other little bits and bobs along the way. Started prepping the car for the turbo conversion, decent wide tyres, adjustable bushes for good alignment, coils and plugs, changed all the filters etc. At that stage, it was a good fun car to drive, handled well and a good daily, just low power and a crap sound...

Did the conversion, ended up costing me around the $2k mark parts alone as i did all the work myself, apart from the $600 of that being custom intercooler piping to avoid cutting the engine bay at all.

Just got the exhaust done, fitted a boost controller (currently set to nothing until I can get the car on a dyno. Currently, the car's even/above par with a mates GTST on 10psi in terms of acceleration, having the turbo spool at 1500rpm, and now 5psi at 2200rpm is very street able.

You'll get alot of negative feed-back against this path, yet the only real downside is the 4 stud brakes/wheels, and the gearbox (depending on the car) that will hold you back. Realistically, not alot of GTST's have standard anything anymore, so why not do the basics while on your P's, and the power package later on?

No, it's not legal to convert it/drive it without an engineers certificate, yet neither is a GTST with a boost controller, FMIC, loud exhaust etc. etc.

WYTSKY DID hit the 295aw/kw mark, then de-tuned for safety, as Aggroman said, 250kw on 14psi, it's not like the engine is limited to any less that a low compression motor, PROVIDED you don't try to make 400hp out of $50, which applies for any performance car...

I think i'll shut up now... :whistling:

Biggest thing about turbo motors and high compression is to keep the boost at a reasonable level. Low compression on turbo motors is to ensure there is no detonation.

As others have said high compression turbo motors will be more responsive up to a reasonable boost level and then detonation risk will prevent you from making more power.

So good fuel and good tune will keep you sorted.

Biggest thing about turbo motors and high compression is to keep the boost at a reasonable level. Low compression on turbo motors is to ensure there is no detonation.

As others have said high compression turbo motors will be more responsive up to a reasonable boost level and then detonation risk will prevent you from making more power.

So good fuel and good tune will keep you sorted.

+1

Realistically, it's not that much more expensive to get good DET power out of a DE+T, yet with more response and the power moved a bit to the left.

There are options to oppose detonation at higher boost levels. E85, decent inter-cooler, water-meth injection, but reliability, long-term effectiveness and cost are the factors.

mine lasted 1 year lol

crack the ringlands on piston #6, ran 1bar of boost.

but liek others have said, aggroman & wytsky have been running decent power on theirs with no issues.

1 bar is a fair bit through 10:1 compression, and a year isn't bad on an un-opened motor, but I bet you didn't regret a moment when it did go?

WYTSKY is running ~19psi from memory?

which make/model do you think of when i say UTE?

SS ute? xr ute? hilux?

so why not use the same principal when choosing a n/a car?

for me its honda integra/civic type r/s2000. not a skyline.

your re-sale will be much much better. when you're ready for a turbo car then go for a skyline. its not worth the $ converting if you cant do it yourself (brakes/rotors, ecu/tune, injectors/pump etc etc). its definitely not a case of just fitting a turbo and off you go.

thanks for all the replies guys it has given me alot of fuel for thought im hoping for an r34 thats the dream i can do the work myself borrow people garages :) as i dont have my own. really want a skyline love them to bits but i really dont want to be disapoint with the na and i do understand the amount of work ide be getting my self into goal, is about 220 as a daily, conservative i know but i dont wana break my babby .can i have recomendations for an na car ? thinkin about getin a mr2 ?? as theres one going cheapish in my area " lookin to get into the drift scene :)" as for commin to the texi i would love to sexy skylines every where sounds like a day in heaven

btw agroman that would be sick i love 34s yours looks mint man absouletly mint can i please have a ride shot gun ??? please???

dude if u wanna drift DONT buy a mr2. Na s13 would be the go + u can always turbo the s13 later. my self i wouldnt bother with a na platform, unless u willing to spend sum cash, ie, they all get smaller brakes, smaller gearboxs, shit diffs etc.

NA MR2s are slower than a wet week, and any mid-engined car is a pain in the backside to maintain. They look cool, though.

Nothing wrong with a DE+T as long as you're not chasing big power/boost. NA internals won't ultimately be able to handle the same cylinder pressures as FI ones (even taking the compression ratio out of the equation) but, as above, you'll still be making a fair amount of power before that becomes an issue. At the same time the lower weight internals and higher compression is going to improve efficiency and response.

Personally I'm all for a DE+T on a street car. On the street big power isn't usable that often, but being more fuel efficient and more responsive is something you can appreciate every day. If you're going to sink big bucks into it down the line to chase big power, even a stock DET is going to need to be cracked and brakes are going to require upgrades, so starting from a NA position becomes irrelevant.

As people have said, it is a good path to work through. Start NA and work on supporting mods (handling, driveline) so you can get used to the car and how to drive it, as well as prepping it for a big power increase, and do that last.

I had a MR2 that was built the other way (stock open diff, rubbish D2 coilovers, stock brakes, but big power) and the thing was exhilarating when you punched the throttle, but scary (in a bad way) when you tried to stop or turn. It's not something I care to repeat.

  • 1 month later...

what about an actual engine transplant my na r34 already has the gt-t brakes so all i would need is the drivetrain of a GT-T (when my one snaps lol ) i can get an NEO rb25det (including ecu, loom) for around $2000-2500 bucks im just wondering what else needs to be done?

i know buying a GT-T is a better option but i would like to work on an engine and learn how it works before i put it in my car (itll be out for around 2.5 years so hopefully i can mod it whislt its out of the car) then when im on my fulls bang it in.

Cheers,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Really? That's piss weak. I didn't know they hobbled the shitboxen that badly. OK. So probs need to buy a flywheel too. But that's not too bad.
    • Hi all. I already posted some newbie-ish questions here and there but this will be my first "big" post. Last summer I went and fulfilled a kind of childhood wish, because I just thought I needed this experience in my life no matter what. The car I bought is a mildly modded 1995 BCNR33 Vspec. It was repainted to a metallic orange color all around and it had all windows reseated. Not so well done black respray in the trunk and a metallic black in the engine bay. From outside it looks very nice except for a minor paint error on the roof and the rear spats needing new adhesive tape. The inside is pretty clean and no broken plastics, missing or faded buttons. Even the adjustable mirrors and trunk antenna work like a charm. Despite a moderately long list of issues I don't (yet) regret buying this car. Most mechanical problems are just due to age, like worn rubbers here and there. The underside sadly has lots of corrosion, especially to the back. It looks like it either has been driven in the winter for a while or it lived near the saltwater in Japan, the rust is nothing terrible but it'll require to be looked after. Mostly panel gaps and all the mounted components underneath are a bit crusty, but I don't think anywhere has progressed so badly that there's going to be holes. Front right jacking rail is crushed and needs some care so it doesn't develop into a rust crater at some point. Worst part is definitely the strut towers. I thought they looked fine but after taking off the strut bar I noticed that it actually started bulging up on the passenger side. Probably would have passed on the car or negotiated down by some thousand Euros more if I had noticed this before buying, but here we are. Trunk area also has signs that there was a water leak to the interior once but nothing too crazy, I guess lots of Skylines had this at some point. As for the list of (known) issues, I'll try to make this compact. I hope the coloring is self explanatory. Mechanical: -Various busted or soon-to-be busted rubber bushings and ball joints. Will replace ball joints with OEM or better and bushings with polyurethane where possible. -Shaking steering wheel at above 80kph -downshift from 5th to 4th is a bit crunchy unless I rev-match, might just try to renew the shifter assembly, but it's not a priority issue -tailshaft centre bearing could use a replacement, is it worth going 1-piece tailshaft as it doesn't look too fresh all around? Chassis: -underbody corrosion on many spots and in hollow spaces, needs to be treated -corrosion on many bolts, hoses, lines, suspension components, subframes, will be treated when replacing of the bushings is needed as time goes on -strut tower top panels and some of the surrounding panels are rusty, so needs fixing. Will look into doing this with a buddy in the winter, otherwise bite the bullet and pay a professional -driver side door is misaligned to the body and needs to go a slight bit more inwards -both door windows are misaligned and have an airgap where the window meets the door at the B pillar -The Aerocatch latches for the bonnet have locks but no keys, need new keys. -driver side door window is kind of gritty and could use a polish -damaged jacking rails and front frame rails, from people lifting the car the wrong way, might have this fixed by a bodyshop Electrical: -Nismo tachometer is just bouncing and displaying nonsense, supposedly worked fine when the stock ECU was still in the car -An old Greddy boost controller sits on the dash which will be removed as it servers no purpose anymore. -a led segment rpm gauge is on the steering column, will probably also be (re-)moved once the Nismo tacho is working correctly -there was an attempt to make the sound system better by the previous owner but it was just inducing noise all the time, ripped out the amp and filters in the back, no music for now -trunk antenna goes up as long as the radio is on regardless of the mode, I want it to only rise if I choose Radio specifically or per switch -3rd brake light is a bit dimmer than the taillights but everything was converted to LEDs so mabye now it just seems dimmer? -reverse light flickers, have to test if that behavior changes when I fiddle with the gear stick. Hope I can get around changing the switch. -Left side taillight, blinker section has minor water intake and is humid after washing. Other side has a hole in it, probably for that exact reason. I'll probably reseal them entirely and plug the holes. Engine: -minor coolant drips on one or the other hose -rear turbo leaks oil onto the exhaust making the car essentially undriveable due to fire hazard -Oil filter relocation kit has an oil drip at the Dash lines, will probably make a new connection there and tighten real good and pray -throttle body assembly is slightly stuck for the first throttle pedal input after sitting for a while I'm always open to suggestions and advice from more experienced people, I'm sure half of this list is easily dealt with and just requires some time and effort to sort out properly. Once I have some proper pictures of the car I will post some in this thread, I just have to remember to take some more once I get the chance to. Will post updates when I have news on anything, I want to try to keep this thread as kind of a logbook as well. Ultimately my goal for this car is to just enjoy it. An engine rebuild is probably going to happen sometime as well, because it is old after all. It will never be fully new again, I am just not that rich. But I want it to look good, work well and not rot away while I drive it. I'm probably gonna spend a lot of money on this journey, hopefully not an unreasonable amount.
    • Hi all. So one of my major issues at the moment is my rear turbo leaking oil on the exhaust (and the general area). I presumed it was the rock hard super old drain hose, which it was not. So now I am in the midst of removing the rear turbo to get access to the banjo bolt that goes into the turbo oil feed. As one of the previous owners accidentally? tore off the OEM oil feed hardline that reaches behind the turbo, they ran braided lines directly to the turbo, presumably PTFE. Now, regardless if the line has rubber or teflon inside, is it just generally a bad idea to do this? I imagine these lines get quite hot being between the engine, turbo core and exhaust manifold. I suppose it's not too far fetched to think the line may even have melted. I'd love to hear your opinions on this as as the replacement OEM hardline piece is 130 per unit. And cutting open the currently mounted line to see inside will mean I just have to get a replacement either way. So far I am hoping maybe the bolt just loosened or (god forbid) they forgot one of the crush washers.
    • If it's a factory 20de manual probably has the 6 bolt flywheel in which case the det clutches won't work as they're 9 bolt.
    • All RB push clutches are interchangeable. AFAIK, the 4cyl ones are not. Different flywheels. The RB small box is not identical to the 4cyl boxes. Just very similar.
×
×
  • Create New...