Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Updating my post for yesterday im parting out a complete r32 gtst car is charcoal grey pic will be up tomorrow

contact me via sms or call 0402022085 car based in craigieburn. i will not respond to pms.

stock r32 wheels with tread bout 50% $600

r32 front seats $300 for the pair.

back seat $200

stock turbo $200 no shaft play.

fmic $150 $250 with all piping

front door windows $120 each

Rear Bar $250

reverse lights $50

tail lights $250 for the pair

front lights $300 for the pair

indicators jap orange$100 for the pair

gearbox $600

front brakes $300 or $400 all round

brake booster master cylinder $150 clutch master $100 clutch slave $80

bonnet two to choose from one is slighty damaged $100 and good one $250

brake rotors $100 each ono

standard suspension $200

diff lsd good condition $400

dash $300

center consol $100

remapped ecu $100

rb20det $1200

anything ive missed txt or call me for prices

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/369937-wrecking-complete-r32-gtst/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...