Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah, but I thought you were getting an R34 GT-R in 7 years time? That'd be the coolest!

And yes, to agree with 13_devil, those photo's are pretty old; they're just concept images. There was another thread drifting around with the latest concept sketches; and that one looked pretty smick.

Edited due to incorrect information; shame on me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37107-r35-gtr/#findComment-743194
Share on other sites

Though, but seriously, the V35/G35 is the successor to the R34 GT-t...
Beerrrrrrmmmmp. Wrong! The V35 (the G35 is merely a *model name* hung on the US delivered V35 Skyline... tis not a chassis number) IS the successor to the R34 Skyline RANGE... there is not a GTS/GTST or whatever you want to relate them to. Theres a sedan, and a coupe, in 200, 300 and 350GT versions and the Stagea wagon wariants. Thats all.

Just to clarify what I'm saying about the chassis number, you don't go calling the VY Monaro (whatever it's called, IDGAF) a "GZ" (whatever) Pontiac now do you? It's just a stupid name so the Yanks don't get all confused and stay away from said new model in droves.

...with the R35 the successor to the R34.
Beeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmmpppp!!! (sorry..) Please tell us SAU peeps who said the "R"35 GT-R was the successor to the R34 GT-R. Please.

My only thought here is to just give people info straight... not all this bollocks speculation that comes out of the US/UK, where the GT-R wasn't even sold. If you want to do a search on all the stuff I've posted on the "The New GT-R", you'll find out that thats what the Japanese press refer to it as, "The New GT-R"! Nothing more, nothing less. So please don't post up stuff that just confuses people.

This New GT-R bizzo is almost as irritating as the "Type M" argument...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37107-r35-gtr/#findComment-743212
Share on other sites

ahahah he's back

now where are those humorous forum type pics?

anthony, do you go to school?

anthony, do you have any intelligence about the skyline series, make and model? :slap:

Use the search button, altavista or google and research before you ask stupid things, the question on if you like this concept car has been asked so many times...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37107-r35-gtr/#findComment-743997
Share on other sites

Use the search button, altavista or google and research before you ask stupid things, the question on if you like this concept car has been asked so many times...

well sorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry if i havnt been a member for as long as u

anthony, do you have any intelligence about the skyline series, make and model?

yes i do, its just this 'concept' skyline im lost about, is this 'the new gtr or not' someone correct me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37107-r35-gtr/#findComment-744152
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...