Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Really need to start squatting myself...have neglected my legs bad over the last few years...although I do run, which helps a bit.

Used to do dumbell squats side by side. I liked these because you could go as deep as your ass on the ground, with relative ease. No need to screw around with the squat rack and a bar across the top of your back. They give your grip and and traps a good workout too.

150kg for 8 reps. I weigh 75kg :P

Have only been training legs for 3 months now. But have recently changed my entire program to do less intense leg work but hit them 4 days a week. I know.... To much or what ever, but this is my first week on it and I've read a lot of different stuff on the matter so I'll see how it goes.

Too much controversy when it comes to squats and guys at my gym have stupid ego but zero form. I smash my legs twice a week at the gym with 1 day involving heavy lifting and the other day involving hypertrophy training. I can only squat 60kg + bar @ 10 reps but I sacrifice weight with perfect form and ensuring my arse is almost touching the ground. You can perform half squats which have shown to work other muscles of the legs. In time I will slowly ramp up the weight until I maintain form everytime I do my squats.'

Any leg training day by far is the most intense but also number 1 for best gains overall :D

Really need to start squatting myself...have neglected my legs bad over the last few years...although I do run, which helps a bit.

Used to do dumbell squats side by side. I liked these because you could go as deep as your ass on the ground, with relative ease. No need to screw around with the squat rack and a bar across the top of your back. They give your grip and and traps a good workout too.

I used to hate doing squats due to the upper back/neck pain pain associated with it, until the new gym i joined up has a Mantaray on their squat rack.. Squats have now become my favorite workout choice. Squats is the most effective and efficient workout method for legs bar none. Legs press/curls on machines is just a waste of time i reckon.

If they dont have a Mantaray at your gym just buy one, its relatively cheap

mantaray_02.jpg

you have to have good flexibility in your ankles/hips to go really low (otherwise you lose balance)... I can't touch my butt to my heels but I go as low as I can

Barbarian: the bar in the squat racks is usually 20kg, so that would put you at 100kg

JKR-32: 150kg is a good squat for someone who weighs 75kg, that's twice your body weight dude, nice!

I'm 85kg so haven't got to double my bodyweight yet... although I still have a few kilos to lose so my lean bodyweight is probably around 80kg

I'm doing 160kg for 6 but I don't go super deep, somewhere between a 'half squat' thighs parallel to the ground and a 'full squat' butt touching heels

if your leg strength is okay but your struggling to keep your back from rounding (your back should stay 100% locked in the same position) you need to do some more back work... rows, glute ham raises, deadlifts etc

I agree that it's the most efficient. I did get some good results from 45 degree leg presses a few years back though. It's essentially the same motion, just without the core stability. Twas my most noticeable increase in muscle out of my whole exercise routine, in fact, but that's most likely because leg exercises are.

I like the dumbells because you can do them anywhere and with little equipment.

Too much controversy when it comes to squats and guys at my gym have stupid ego but zero form. I smash my legs twice a week at the gym with 1 day involving heavy lifting and the other day involving hypertrophy training. I can only squat 60kg + bar @ 10 reps but I sacrifice weight with perfect form and ensuring my arse is almost touching the ground. You can perform half squats which have shown to work other muscles of the legs. In time I will slowly ramp up the weight until I maintain form everytime I do my squats.'

Any leg training day by far is the most intense but also number 1 for best gains overall :D

Word up.

If you want a good form and great physique, doing squats in a calm fashion is the way to do it. I do at min 10reps + 4 sets. By the time im finished my legs are throbbing and it feels great man.. haha

Another advantage of leg/squat workout is it also works on your core area. Its just been recently i've gotten back in to gym again and had a developed a little belly over the few months, a muffin top if you call it but after hitting the legs for the pass couple months my stomach is flat, showing some ab cuts underneath.

Doing cardio for a good 20 mins before leg workout also helps

yeah if your going to compare squats they all have to be at the MINIMUM parallel otherwise keep pulling your dick :)

Also the bar is always included in the total weight so you don't have to say plus bar.

Squatted 120 for 20 atg last week, haven't done any 1rms for a few years now(best was 180 at 78)

they have a padded roll at my gym that helps make it a bit less painful... the girls fold up a towel as well but those Mantaray things look really cool

if your traps are relatively well developed they help keep the bar off the vertebrae which is what's most uncomfortable about squatting IMHO

got this guy at my gym who is always doing exercises with maybe 25% of the full range of motion... he was doing weighted pull ups and hardly moving up and down more than 20cm... same with the T Bar rows he was doing... maybe he knows something I don't but it looks ridiculous... he's one of those guys who's very lean, looks great but no mass and is always trying to lift way too much with hardly any range of motion

I agree that it's the most efficient. I did get some good results from 45 degree leg presses a few years back though. It's essentially the same motion, just without the core stability. Twas my most noticeable increase in muscle out of my whole exercise routine, in fact, but that's most likely because leg exercises are.

I like the dumbells because you can do them anywhere and with little equipment.

But your limited to around 100kg which is nothing when it comes to squatting. Good as a supplementary exercise but it cannot

replace barbell squatting.

It only takes a couple heavy sessions for your traps to get used to the bar and then you can't feel it.

Another good leg strength exercise is the farmer's walk...just carrying a couple of dumbells by your side and walking with them. It's so simple yet effective...simulating the weight of a fat person without actually being fat = strong legs. And because you're not standing in a static position, ala squats, you create some really useful strength (athletics, sports etc.). Probably a good idea to use them in conjunction.

But your limited to around 100kg which is nothing when it comes to squatting. Good as a supplementary exercise but it cannot

replace barbell squatting.

It only takes a couple heavy sessions for your traps to get used to the bar and then you can't feel it.

120kg at my gymnasium. When you're doing full ass-to-ground squats with that, and your goal isn't to become a power lifter, that's plenty.

120kg at my gymnasium. When you're doing full ass-to-ground squats with that, and your goal isn't to become a power lifter, that's plenty.

No it's not at all. The only reason everything thinks that is because no one trains legs as much as they should.

Most people are benching around 100kg, then struggle to squat 100kg. That is DISGUSTING!

If people actually trained like they should, 120 atg squats would still be warming up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...