Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've used the tyre calculators before to check rolling diameter, trouble is there is no allowance for wheel size and therefore potential stretch. That one did have the info on recommended size though which was useful, looks like I should be going for 255s.

Any other thoughts or experiences are useful though!

I'd agree that 245 is way too narrow for a 9.5" rim.

I am somewhat biased though as I do not like the stretched look at all.

Try this rim/tyre calculator.

http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5961140
Share on other sites

i know im goin to get flamed to death for saying it, but IMHO the federal 595 is highly over rated on a daily drive car. they are great for a weekend warrior or if u do ALOT of hard cornering. but for the daily commute i'd suggest something thats a little better in the wet and maybe wears better. i also agree with the other guys a 245 is pretty narrow on a 9.5 inch rim. id be goin a 265 to protect the rim a little better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5962498
Share on other sites

I like a slight stretched look and to help fit in the guards a little better. On my 180sx the rear runs a 9.5 with a 235-45. On the M35 the new rims are 9" so I will run a 245-45-18 but would really prefer a 235 but the diameter isnt as nice as the 245. I would never run a 265 on a 9.5" rim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5963391
Share on other sites

i'd beg to differ

pythagorus yo!

also, www.willtheyfit.com is one of the best tire size calculator i've found

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964167
Share on other sites

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

But wouldn't changing the angle of the sidewall change how the tread sits and therefore the rolling diameter? Or is that a really dumb question?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964264
Share on other sites

It would change the dia by a small amount only, didn't you guys do geometry at school, think of a tree that is 10 mtrs high, standing upright it is 10 but when on a lean it is slightly less high, the length though doesn't change but the height does, the ground is the fixed point as in the rim being the fixed point.

Dia may be changed by a mil or two maybe, post up the height of the side wall and the size of the gap from vertical.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964377
Share on other sites

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

changing the angle of the sidewall would change the height from the bead to the tread

immagine house, the wall height is 2m, the length of the roof could be 2 meters too but the height of the wall is 2m because its vertical but because the roof is on an angle the heigh of the roof may only be 1m

i think what would happen in real life would be that the circumference of the tyre would be under a little bit of compression and the sidewall would be put in tension (otherwise the tyre would wrinkle like you said, this is also neglecting the internal pressure of the air and the load from the car's weight)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964491
Share on other sites

well, using this website is the perfect example. the circumference cant be changed.

www.willtheyfit.com

put in the EXACT same tyre size into the boxes, just change the rim width and tell me what you get with rolling diameters for both sets of values.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967116
Share on other sites

195 185

Diameter 559.1mm 570.1mm

Circumference 1756.5mm 1791mm

Poke 81.6mm 81.6mm

Inset 121.6mm 121.6mm

Speedo error 0% -1.93%

Reading at 30mph 30mph 29.42mph

Reading at 60mph 60mph 58.84mph

Ride height gain 0mm 5.5mm

Arch gap loss 0mm 5.5mm

diameter changed? not by much but it did. everything else is the same except width

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967128
Share on other sites

something still isnt right about it.

if you were to measure the side wall between the two (stretched/not so stretched) the wall length would HAVE to be different for the rolling circumference to change. you can see that in the image. which means that instead of being 195/45, it may be 195/47(for argument sake) im pretty sure the rubber wont physically stretch to meet the exact circumference.

you may be very right. just doesnt make sense to me.

lol not strange that your right. strange by the law of physics. it simply doesnt agree with the pythagoras theorem which actually can be used. the hypotenuse would actually be larger with the larger width wheel, for the circumference to be exactly the same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967158
Share on other sites

how can you use pythagorus when youre talking about a circumference?

i know you mean the cross section of the wheel/tyre, but you have to remember you cant make a circle smaller or larger unless you add or subtract to it, thus affecting the tyre size, then it would change the size of the sidewall to accomodate the larger/smaller rolling diameter

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967173
Share on other sites

i think i know what your trying to get at with the amount of rubber being the same around the circumference. and it does make sense.

but unfortunately rubber works differently. you are actually subracting from the circle(circumference) by adding a wider wheel, back to hypotenuse, for a wider wheel to = the same rolling circumference as thinner wheel, there has to be a larger hypotenuse(wall). the only way that can happen with the same spec tires, is by physically stretching the rubber material in the wall, which would make it go from a 45 -> 47 theoretically.

I think mythbusters is needed lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967195
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...