Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have one of those 30% more clamping purple clutches..

It has been pretty damn good and lasted almost 2 years of hard launching & gear changes. It has always slipped a little easier than expected however the front seal of my gearbox does seep a little oil so I assume this is the cause.

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

I put an exedy Twin Plate (new) clutch with lightened flywheel in my 33GTR yesterday. My old Heavy Duty Exedy Single was stuffed!!! had nothing at all left on it when we got it out... value for money on that clutch :D

The new twin plate is great from what i have driven so far, no rattling (yet, will happen when it gets a bit worn i think)... bites hard, bit heavier under the foot, but still very drivable.. I'm happy with it, makes my car feel tougher...

Nismo use the same exedy twin i put in...

how can a twin plate clutch be easy to drive on the street as a daily driver?

Simplistically a single plate clutch, to hold say 500 bhp, has to have a much higher clamping pressure than a twin plate to hold the same 500 bhp. The reason is that there is twice as much surface (friction) area to transfer the torque in a twin plate. So if you have found other twin plates harder to drive then that would be because;

1. Maybe they are set up to handle much greater torque loadings than the single platers you are comparing them to

2. They are set up to suite a particular requirement, not what they are being used for ie; quick change, no slip competition

3. They do take some time to get used to, with twice the friction area they are quite different in feel

4. There are types of twin plates (solid centre, puck, ceramic, cermatallic etc) just like there are different types of single plates. Not one type suites all.

The reality is once you get to a certian power level you really have no choice, a multiplate clutch is a must. So the best you can do is choose the one that suites your own requirements and preferences. :D

good info here...

i need some input on this...i installed an orc twin plate

on my bro's s14...straight from the start when you clutch in

there is a real loud continues rattle...i didnt think much of this

and thought it was just caues its a multiplate clutch, am i right?

big problem is...it wont go into gear now.. after the install it was

fine, hard to get into first and reverse...then it loosened up after

about 500k's and now it wont go into gear... engine off no probs

but no luck when on..what could be causing this?

i've noticed that the 'rattling' when clutched in is not as noisy as

before too.. im thinking somehow the fork as shifted on the bearing

holder or something...

final question is when you guys installed your multiplate clutches

did you need to machine the bearing holder so that the bearing sits

further back from that of the factory position? to compensate for the

extra width of the new clutch?

any help would be GREATLY appreciated...

I'm going for a 3000lb 5 puck ceramic clutch in my GTR. A mate is running one and it seems to be up to the job so far in his GTR. it's a bit bitey but so was the one in my GTS-t so i'm use to it. cost me about $650, was going to install it myself but I'm kinda tight for time so I'll prob get it done at the mechanics along with getting the flywheel machined.

i just got the exedy single plate organic sports... driven about 400kms and bites quite good... but i still have trouble nudging forward and reversing as it shudders... not sure how long before this wears off.

I have the same and it does it, I'm not sure what causes it, but the simple and easy answer is not to ride the clutch.

Lunatic Dancer: Exedy Twin Plate....

no rattles/noises (yet, will probably get them when its worn a bit)

In fact, it actually fixed a noise which i thought was my gear box...

When in neutral, clutch out (engaged) it made a sound like something spinning, i thought it was just worn gears on my gearbox....when pushing the clutch in (disengage) it went away... after changing my clutch, that sound has totally gone....

Thinking of getting the Nismo coppermix kit from Nengun ~400ps $1600 delivered comes with pressure and clutch plates, thrust bearing and lightenened flywheel. OR

From Taka Kaira, Ogura Kit ~400ps also $1600 delivered with above parts.

Anyone heard any good stuff on these?

Duncan: Yes we changed my thrust bearing with a new one when we did it, the old one seemed fine tho (was a bit black from clutch dust, but spinning fine)....

As for the clutchs from overseas - be careful about 'delivered' prices... with a box that heavy and that big, you may get slammed with customs tax

Sydneykid...

i need some input on this...i installed an orc twin plate

on my bro's s14...straight from the start when you clutch in

there is a real loud continues rattle...i didnt think much of this

and thought it was just caues its a multiplate clutch, am i right?

big problem is...it wont go into gear now.. after the install it was

fine, hard to get into first and reverse...then it loosened up after

about 500k's and now it wont go into gear... engine off no probs

but no luck when on..what could be causing this?

i've noticed that the 'rattling' when clutched in is not as noisy as

before too.. im thinking somehow the fork as shifted on the bearing

holder or something...

final question is when you guys installed your multiplate clutches

did you need to machine the bearing holder so that the bearing sits

further back from that of the factory position? to compensate for the

extra width of the new clutch?

Sydneykid...

i need some input on this...i installed an orc twin plate

on my bro's s14...straight from the start when you clutch in

there is a real loud continues rattle...i didnt think much of this

and thought it was just caues its a multiplate clutch, am i right?

Yep that's right, but not all multi plate clutches rattle. Some have anti rattle springs, they are silent just like a single plate.

big problem is...it wont go into gear now.. after the install it was

fine, hard to get into first and reverse...then it loosened up after

about 500k's and now it wont go into gear... engine off no probs

but no luck when on..what could be causing this?

Since there are 4 friction surfaces, they wear in a lot compared to a single plate with 2 friction surfaces. So they need adjusting, otherwise there is not enough movement to dissengage the clutch. Nissans don't have adjustable rods, they use a byspass in the slave cylinder to take up the slack caused by normal wear. Refer below.

i've noticed that the 'rattling' when clutched in is not as noisy as  

before too.. im thinking somehow the fork as shifted on the bearing

holder or something...

Unlikely, it is usually all or nothing when it comes to fork movement.

final question is when you guys installed your multiplate clutches

did you need to machine the bearing holder so that the bearing sits

further back from that of the factory position? to compensate for the

extra width of the new clutch?

No, but I have never done an S14 (or an S13 or an S15) for that matter. There are however a number of different Nissan fork pivots, some are longer than others. You need to choose the right one to position the clutch fork in the right place.

It sounds to me like you might have had the wrong fork pivot (too long) and that's why you had to machine the thrust holder. So how to fix it? Well, I would try a longer rod, that will at least eliminate the lack of travel question without removing the gearbox. You could weld a short piece of rod onto the standard rod or find a slightly longer Nissan rod from a different model. You used to be able to buy adjustable rods, do a bit of shopping around.

Hope that helps. :)

PS; it is not unusual for R32s' to break the pivot ball, I don't know whether this applies to S14's. You can easily check by looking in the fork hole with a torch.

SK,

Some multi plate clutches require a shortened thrust bearing carrier. ORC and HKS are the two brands i witnessed this with. Nissan make different length carriers as well.

I've never altered my pivot points as it creates more complications as you've mentioned.

Lunatic Dancer,

I think you may have mentioned out too much from the carrier which is ending up reducing your throw.

Did you try giving the system a good bleed...?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...