Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SSS automotive were advertising GTST-4 RB20DET's for around $1000- with warranty

Fark that a good price for a 20....

but mate at the end of the day its ur choice. I too a few weeks ago i was coming from same situation u r and i stayed true to the 20.I would stick with the rb20 because they arent as shit as people say they are and with a good setup and tune they can be a f**king weapon,u can boost the f**k out of em because of there lower compression and if u take care of it it will last you a long time :worship:

  • 11 months later...
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Found this old thread and decided to dig it up.

Cars still off the road, But has the following:

Rb25 from s1 stagea, pulled appart, crack tested, acid dipped, bored & honed.

Weisco forged pistons .5mm o/s

Tomei poncams

Tomei valve springs

Acl race series bearings (full set)

Arp head stud kit

Cometic 1.01mm head gasket

+ new oem gasket kit ;) + porting etc.

All from www.rawbrokerage.com parts were cheaper than my engine builder could get in, very happy with their service.

Motors ready to go, now I'm sorting out my loom options, and once it's running will be coupled with ext gate gtx3076, e85 and 20-22psi. Aiming for 300-350awkw. So much for 250 awkw haha!

Build thread coming soon

Cheers for everyone's help, took me a while to wake up to the 25, the 20 can be a paperweight.

If you have a S1 stagea motor the ecu will be no good to you as it can't be Nistuned. Look for an R33 loom and then you can fit a Z32 ecu to Nistune or put a Link or Vipec in the R33 case. Trick wire to look for: the one from TPS to Atessa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...