Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey im trying to hunt down a miss fire in my rb25det

the car is a stock rb25det making 470rwhp at 26psi

last 3-4 weeks its been getting bad, now its time 2 do something about it.

basically the car from cold will start up and run on 5 cyclinders for first 10secs then clear up and run fine.

i can drive around off boost and it will run fine. As soon as i give the car a hard time and thrash it, i can pull up and on idle its back to 5 cyclinders.mind you it runs perfectly fine under load/boost

ive narrowed it down to cyclinder 6 which is the cyclinder not firing.

ive tried new injectors,coilpack wiring harness etc

injectors have been cleaned etc and new seals.

ive done a compression test and its good came back with 150-155 from 1-6

anyone else got any ideas? some ppl ive talked to think its lifter problem in cyclinder 6?

Edited by methz
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/
Share on other sites

4350772539_55ff96415a_o.jpg&sa=X&ei=uotlTsuKKMLOmAXolZGaCg&ved=0CAUQ8wc4AQ&usg=AFQjCNGlgx_MfDkMMdcgSkJIa3LWOkL0Zw

Simon is making 500+hp on a stock motor? Misfiring could be caused by many things but it seems you've tried the basics. I will be keeping an eye on this thread to see how it progresses. Keep us posted. What I would suspect is the spark plug or coil back. Next would be wiring. Next would be CAS(could be playing up?) Sounds electrical to me. My car had similar symptoms on startup. It would sound like its missing a cylinder or even two and after a few seconds they all kick in, my spark plugs were on their way out. Try gap your plugs closer see if that gets rid of the misfire.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/#findComment-6002873
Share on other sites

plugs are about 500kms old bk7re always used them.

leak down test might be on the cards then, might ask my tuner 2 perform this.

yes 26psi thru gt35r on a stock rb25. i dont always run this boost. only turned it up for a dyno day not long ago.

running 1.75bar atm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/#findComment-6002980
Share on other sites

At that power level I am assuming normal 98 pump gas? Simon is getting away with it on an ethanol mix, petrol would probably be a bit much for the crap fuel we get in this part of the world :(

+1 on compression test.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/#findComment-6003033
Share on other sites

yes pump 98 bp ultimate

car has been on big boost and 400hp for a few yrs now.

ive done 2 compression test's and both came up fine 150-155 across all 6.

leak down i have not done, i dont even know someone with the right tool 2 do it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/#findComment-6003068
Share on other sites

Try a CAS and see. Just borrow a mates one if possible.

Have u upgraded the valve springs?

Does the engine tick when its misfiring?

Any smoke?

Do a compression test when it starts to misfire if u can. Maybe a valve seat issue

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/#findComment-6003438
Share on other sites

Gonna try new CAS 2morrow morning.

Valve springs are stock

only ticking noise is from the injectors, as far as im aware

no smoke at all.

ill get it 2 run on 5 and do a compression test then and see wot it comes up with.

yeh my tuner thinks a lifter or valve or something along those lines in cyclinder 6

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376360-rb25-miss-fire/#findComment-6003477
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...