Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt3076 Query

brentos

By brentos,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

brentos Community Regular

brentos

Posted
Posted

Hi Guys,

I have query about the 3076 that I was sent. I am certain that I requested one with the usual 4inch anti surge, 6 fin compressor wheel with the .60 A/R housing, however I was sent the one in the image below.

It has the 7 fin inlet wheel (T04 wheel I think?) and .70 A/R compressor housing with a 4" inlet.

The exhaust housing is spot on and is the usual .82 that most of you guys seem to use.

post-59604-0-13352600-1315456144_thumb.jpg

My question is if I decided to use this turbo how much worse off would the response be compared to the newer style 3076 with the 4" anti surge and 6 fin wheel?

Is anyone running one like this and what sort of power do you make?

Couldn't find any info in other threads regarding how much power people are making with this turbo with this front housing.

Cheers

post-59604-0-13352600-1315456144_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/
Share on other sites
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

brentos Community Regular

brentos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

that will still make very similar power to the other version, there isnt much difference in them power wise

Thanks Titan.

What about response wise is there much difference?

Another thing will this turbo fit ok between the standard manifold and wheel arch / tower. I have the 10mm spacer. Reason I ask is because of the size difference in the A/R compressor housing size and it looks like It might cut it close..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6006186
Share on other sites
limpus Mentor

limpus

Posted
Posted

Personally I would return that 7 blade version and get the proper 6 blade version with the 4" ported comp cover...thats what you ordered and thats what you should get...there is some material on here about how the 7 blade versions are inferior...discopotatoe is the guy to speak to...hopefully he'll chime in...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6006273
Share on other sites
The Mafia Grand Master

The Mafia

Posted
Posted

Titan is 100% wrong.

I had one, and it made 240rwkw. Maxed. Mater meth, and it made 250rwkw.

Then I got a real gt3076r, 6 blades, surge slots, etc, made 300rwkw. Attached water meth and made 320rwkw.

All on a 0.63 rear housing. Full boost by 3200rpm in 4th. Made 720nm and held that to the limiter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6006411
Share on other sites
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Ye the 7-blade one is not the one you want. Bad and nasty performance for what should be the same price for a proper 6-blade.

I actually thought they'd stopped making them in that option given the choices of 3076s out now with various trims etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6006438
Share on other sites
The Mafia Grand Master

The Mafia

Posted
Posted (edited)

Thanks for the replys guys.

I have contacted them asking to change it to the correct .60 A/R housing. Will have to wait and see what happens.

Dude, you want a whole new turbo with the 6 blades. Not just the cover.

Ask them for the GT3037. Or CHRA 700177-5007

It looks like the one in my avatar.

Edited by The Mafia
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6007050
Share on other sites
discopotato03 Grand Master

discopotato03

Posted
Posted

Yes as Mr Mafia said get the real one which was and still is a HKS spec turbo , only sold through Garrett as well .

The real ones Garrett part number is 700382-10 using cartridge number 700177-7 .

Do it once do it right and think seriously about what he said about the 0.63 A/R turbine housing if lag troubles you at all .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6007100
Share on other sites
Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

I had that issue in NZ back when I was trying to get a GT3076R for my car, all the local outfits kept telling me either its pretty much the same or that it was actually the one I wanted - I had to order from the states to get what I wanted in the end. There is definitely a pretty noticeable difference between the two, using this version would be regrettable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6007235
Share on other sites
brentos Community Regular

brentos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Dude, you want a whole new turbo with the 6 blades. Not just the cover.

Ask them for the GT3037. Or CHRA 700177-5007

It looks like the one in my avatar.

Thats what I told him mate. And now he is going to exchange the entire turbo (1 with the proper 6 fin and .60 A/R) so it should all be fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6007661
Share on other sites
brentos Community Regular

brentos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes as Mr Mafia said get the real one which was and still is a HKS spec turbo , only sold through Garrett as well .

The real ones Garrett part number is 700382-10 using cartridge number 700177-7 .

Do it once do it right and think seriously about what he said about the 0.63 A/R turbine housing if lag troubles you at all .

A .

Thanks Disco.

I was wanting to still use the .82 housing, my mate has that housing on his 3076 and the lag on that doesn't trouble me at all, so I will stick with that.

And I would have to stick with the Garrett as thats all I can get a replacement for.

What is the difference between the 700382-12 (700382-5012) and 700382-10 (700382-5010) products? Is one 52trim and one 56trim? is there any difference?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6007716
Share on other sites
Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

Do it once do it right and think seriously about what he said about the 0.63 A/R turbine housing if lag troubles you at all .

I don't know what reasoning you have for that, but its not the best recommendation you've made imho - especially after having had both myself. The .82 only loses any noticeable amount of go below 3000rpm, where isn't a place RB25s are "about" anyway. Above there the .82a/r feels nicer, is nicer on the engine (Mafia needed WMI to suppress detonation, I and others have battled boost creep with .63s) and naturally is capable of more power.

I never looked back from upgrading from the .63 to the .82 - though again the OP has obviously also experienced a "real" 56T with .82a/r hotside and knows how nice a setup they are to drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6007757
Share on other sites
brentos Community Regular

brentos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't know what reasoning you have for that, but its not the best recommendation you've made imho - especially after having had both myself. The .82 only loses any noticeable amount of go below 3000rpm, where isn't a place RB25s are "about" anyway. Above there the .82a/r feels nicer, is nicer on the engine (Mafia needed WMI to suppress detonation, I and others have battled boost creep with .63s) and naturally is capable of more power.

I never looked back from upgrading from the .63 to the .82 - though again the OP has obviously also experienced a "real" 56T with .82a/r hotside and knows how nice a setup they are to drive.

I just sent the incorrect turbo back to them and told them I want the real 56T one which had the part number 700382-5012

I also told them to stick with the .82 rear housing. I wanted to keep the .82 housing as it has the potential of more power if I desire it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376583-gt3076-query/#findComment-6008036
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • soviet_merlin
      Stagea Front CV Axle Question

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • MBS206
      R32 GTST - 600KW+ RB28/CD009 Build

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • dbm7
      Stagea Front CV Axle Question

      By dbm7 · Posted

      Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • Duncan
      Stagea Front CV Axle Question

      By Duncan · Posted

      I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • soviet_merlin
      Stagea Front CV Axle Question

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...