Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Let me understand then what exactly is happening on throttle off. When you come off boost and shut the throttle the air will revirb back and flow through the recirc pipe back into the turbo and stay in the system. Correct? Ok now lets say, just for simple example, the car measured 10 litres of air coming in and allowed 200ml of fuel to be added for this air. The engine does its cycle on boost, burns 8 litres of air and 100ml of fuel. You back off the throttle and the plate shuts with this 2 litres of air still in the intake before the throttle and 100ml of fuel for the counted air. To prevent the car from stalling is this where the AAC valve kicks in? Since the throttle is closed you are going to need to let this air come in to burn this fuel to keep the engine on and from stalling. My car for the last week has been stalling its nut when I come off boost and let the revs drop. I am running a full recirc system.

What is the cause of this stalling state? Ive cleaned the AAC but have not taken it for a drive yet. Am I right when I am saying the engine is using the AAC to let in this air to burn off this fuel? When the throttle is shut, obviously air isnt going to get in there but if there is fuel in the piston its going to need air to burn...

If you have an O2 sensor (wideband) in when this is happening you can see what the engine does. Desired AFR > Close throttle body> momentarily rich then full lean (deceleration, no problem). So as GTSBoy said, no part is played by your AAC valve. The engine doesnt need power during deceleration so it doesnt inject any fuel at all and doesnt really need any air. When the car returns to an idle state it will open the AAC valve and use the air feed from there.

As for Rolls question about "how did nissan tune out the stalling issue". Remember that the cars were designed like that (the ones without bov's) so it wasnt so much "tuning it out" as much as tuning the car to suit. As far as I know the introduction of BOV's was an emission thing as well as helping with spool times between gear changes, was supposed to be an improvement and hence the ECU was tuned to suit. running no BOV confuses the AFM from what I know, as it see's air flowing in the wrong direction.

I run an aftermarket BOV plumback, purely because I hate the sound of the standard BOV's, annoyed the hell out of me. So I will never argue that they dont work etc, but I dont see myself ever running one again

Edited by 89CAL

89CAL u are right about the decelleration. But his issue isnt on decel as such its when it returns to idle after decel, thats when it drops the rpm too low and stalls the engine

As for Rolls question about "how did nissan tune out the stalling issue". Remember that the cars were designed like that (the ones without bov's) so it wasnt so much "tuning it out" as much as tuning the car to suit.

How does one tune it to suit then?

How does one tune it to suit then?

The ones running without BOV's at all were probably tuned similar to what your standard R33 is (I dont know which cars these are so cant say to much)

You can get away with NO BOV from what I remember, but its at least alot easier then running an atmo BOV

but as Paul said, just a matter of driving around, finding the cells were its pumping fuel in and adjusting to bring it back to a normal AFR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...