Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all so i was talking to this guy at work who is a car nutter (like 40 lives at home with his dad and spends all his money doing up one of his 10 commodores haha)

so anyway he also has a datto 1600 and a 1984? Bluebird, and this is where my question lies.

Apparently the Bluebird is running a 2L datsun engine (not sure which one) with a custom turbo setup consisting of carburetor to turbo to throttle boddy, and at first I'm like wtf is that even possible and then he explains it to me (most of which i didnt understand) and how it doesn't run and intercooler and some other shit.

car makes 184HP at the wheels on 8psi

so anyway when i get home I inform my dad who is also quite experienced with cars, although Im willing to say probably not as much as this guy. But my dad says its not possible....ARGUMENT BREAKS OUT..so on so on hahaha.

Can anyone confirm this please so i can settle it once and for all?

Ill try get pics (he had them on his phone to show me)

Cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/377712-carburetor-running-turbo-engine/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yes this is possible, from what i understand from what you've said, he's running a in a draw through configuation

Thanks very much, any chance you or anyone can explain this a little more?

also cheers socrates for your input.

yes def possible, draw thru is the way to go. and turbo's have been around longer than every day fuel injection.

my bro used to have a kombi with a setup like this. only issue you have with a draw thru is that your pulling your fuel mixture thru the turbo itself, which can make it a small pain to get tuned and running right. my brother kombi had an SU carby infront of it, seemed to give tyhe most progressive flow.

in your post you speak of a throttle body aswell?? that doesnt need to be there, as the carby is the throttle body in these setups.

11458.jpg

Turbo sucks air through the carby. Turbos need to be built with different gaskets - ones which won't break down when they get fuel on them.

Apart from that it's cake. Strombergs are one of the most popular carbies to use but webers are good too, as the above pic shows.

Wow thanks so much guys....this is why i love SAU haha

one more thing, can someone explain how the fuel doesnt explode from the heat generated by the turbo?

cant wait to see the look on my dads face nyaanyaa.gif

Edited by RBert

Not enough pressure and no source of ignition, ie. spark.

Cylinder pressure is up around 150+psi, where as a turbo may be producing 25psi between the turbo and inlet. And fuel doesn't ignite well without a direct source of ignition. Drop a lit cigarette into fuel and it's not likely to ignite.

Edited by Cowboy1600

As above, fuel has a fairly high spontaneous combustion point(with source of ignition), and the heat of the turbo just isn't hot enough on the inlet side.

The fuel actually helps to cool the inlet down by using the heat in the air to vaporise, in a way similar to water injection.

everything above is correct. there have been various cars over the years running carby turbo setups. in fact there was even a turbo VB commodore (unsure whether it was a holden thing or just a thing done by a few dealers). very rare. a mate of mine actually has one of the setups tucked away in his cupboard.

Oh, and your mates car would be an L20B which is a very, very popular engine to do suck through set ups on. They are tough motors. Although for racing applications many people use L18s as they rev harder. You can bore them out to nearly 2L (bore and stroke can go past this but you lose some revs). Again, incredibly tough motors.

I've owned 1600s and 180bs with either L18s or L20bs (and one Z18et which is an L18 bottom end with a twin spark head, EFI and turbo) and if you saw the sheer destruction I tried to force upon them you would be horrified. Simply horrified.

Oh, and your mates car would be an L20B which is a very, very popular engine to do suck through set ups on. They are tough motors. Although for racing applications many people use L18s as they rev harder. You can bore them out to nearly 2L (bore and stroke can go past this but you lose some revs). Again, incredibly tough motors.

I've owned 1600s and 180bs with either L18s or L20bs (and one Z18et which is an L18 bottom end with a twin spark head, EFI and turbo) and if you saw the sheer destruction I tried to force upon them you would be horrified. Simply horrified.

Off topic

Would a Z18ET head bolt directly onto an L20 bottom end with no mods? Sounds tempting.

Definately have a soft spot for the L series engines. Indestructable. Mine has done roughly ~300,000k, odometer stopped at 250,000km - Always gets a flogging when it's driven, but oil is changed every 5000km with out fail - all original parts.

Currently my Bluebird's stock head is off being reconditioned and mechanically cleaned, so much carbon gets caked onto the exhaust ports - it's crazy.

Only reason for the head coming off is because one of the head bolts snapped, but lucky no blown headgasket. Just doing the cleaning and reconditioning due to all the effort taking the head off.

It will, but manifolds are different. They are a crossflow head.

Try and get your hands on an A87 head off an L18. They are the high comp, big port heads and get L20s singing up to 1000rpm harder than stock.

Failing finding an A87, the W53 is next best option.

I had an A87 and a factory EFI head (and complete set up_ in my shed until late last year. In fact I think the guy who bough the EFI stuff off me is selling it again. Check Ozdat

a BLOW THRU carby set up has been used many times over the years, its a matter of sealing the carb up so it doesnt leak boost. . . .no fuel in the turbo that way . . .as for the L series L20B, lots of mods are easy to do on these motors including stroking using Z series parts :thumbsup:

on the L20 discussion, my mechanic mate had a L20 in a 1600. it was bored and stroked. made about 155hp at the wheels (still natro) from memory. only problem was that it kept arcing out headgaskets because of how bored out it was (gasket was too thin between cylinders).

a BLOW THRU carby set up has been used many times over the years, its a matter of sealing the carb up so it doesnt leak boost. . . .no fuel in the turbo that way . . .as for the L series L20B, lots of mods are easy to do on these motors including stroking using Z series parts :thumbsup:

That's great mate, but we're talking suck through.

Z24 cranks stroke them out to 2.4L and they go like hell. But it requires a fair bit of work to get a Z crank to fit an L series.

on the L20 discussion, my mechanic mate had a L20 in a 1600. it was bored and stroked. made about 155hp at the wheels (still natro) from memory. only problem was that it kept arcing out headgaskets because of how bored out it was (gasket was too thin between cylinders).

The world needs more angry Ford 2.0 pinto's and L20s etc imo

and im a Big engine nutter

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...