Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When talking SS prices, be sure to be comparing like for like. There is 304 vs 316 (L grades of each) plus all the other grades of 300 stainless, that are often more suitable for exhausts. You then have various standards for tubing. Your 304 is typically welded tube fit for arhitectural hand rails etc (A554 etc). Some use it no problem in exhaust. Other standards are for pressure piping (A369/270 etc) , heat exchanger tube etc and are far more expensive.

Then on top you have wall thickness....so may not be a case of one place cheaper then others...usually just different. Anyone use Carringtons in western Sydney? They used to be cheaper then Midway, Atlas, Austeel, Sandvik, Prochem, Geordi etc etc

Nice work on the dumps...have to be happy with that :)

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yea very happy with it mate, very happy with what i paid for it all as well as i expected it to be alot more for the amount of effort that was put into it

cant remember what grade of Stainless was used, it was the good sh!t though, very smooth internally and the bends were the same diameter as the rest of the pipe..

wasnt 304, 316 possibly? dont know my stainless very well :thumbsup:

LOL, there are more important things in this world to know then grades of stainless :) My industry uses a lot of it so know a little, I am more interested in what lesser grades of stainless people use and get away with. I used 321 but not sure its worth the expense?

As with most of these things, they have different grades for a reason. A higher number doesn't mean it is better for the job.

304 is typically used in exhaust systems due to the fact it is more malleable and the higher grades like 316 and 321 will polish much shinier but are more brittle so are prone to cracking in high heat situations

Oh man...this is all from memory...so happy to be corrected. 321 is on paper better then 304 at elevated temperatures due to the inclusion of titanium in it and improves its mechanical properties at high temps. You can get high carbon variants of 304, which are termed 304H. Not 304, and certainly not 304L which is a low carbon version as like 316L they have reduced strength at high temperature so not used for structural/pressure applications at elevated temperatures.

We never use 304 in heat exchangers etc. Quite often we use 321 or other high carbon or stabilised austenitic stainless steels. In an exhaust you dont care about the corrosion properties of ss, rather things like the creep strength, thermal expansion and structural stability/embrittlement which is where the 321 is better. Though they are all about the same with regards to withstanding general corrosion at higher temps in only air.

Years ago I was my old employers boffin on stainless and material selection. That was 12 years ago and now moved more into management so have forgotten the ins and out of the metallurgy of how the grain structures change/react to temps etc. :(

But at the end of the day if people are using 1.2mm thick welded 304 tube in their dumps and lasting then who gives a shit what texts say. The proof is in the pudding. The lads where i used to work all used 321 for their crazy race boat headers and manifolds etc. The downstream exhaust was often 304, but the manifolds 321. I think you will generally find thats common practice in the old school world of header design and racing. Overkill? I dunno :(

ps...it was either Prochem or Atlas that had pretty good tech data which may be of interest to anyone that cares

This is exhaust tubing.

You regular stainless tube sales company that supplies to the automotive and/or light engineering or building industry is not going to be that technical on the grade to the point that you are explaining.

321 contains titanium but it would never be found at places like Tubesales or Right Price Exhausts. The difference between 304 and 316 is the inclusion of Moly in the 316. Their strength is much the same and they have similar corrosion resistance but when you subject 316 to hot and cold cycling close to the melting point, eventually the 316 becomes more brittle than than 304.

321 and 304H are not really used for exhausts. There is no point and they cost more.

304 wouldn't be used in heat exchangers because it is less resistance to corrosion than 321 so with steam, heat or presence of minerals and salts, it will withstand better.

Most of the above has nothing really to do with Joey's exhaust, however. The tube will be 304 or 316 (most likely the latter) and the specific details of the composition of the metal aren't going to change much for him between exhaust shops/fabricators

Dont exhaust boys purge weld stainless? I purge everything when it comes stainless pipe and tube it welds nicer and there aint no grinding dags inside pipe or tube ever

The material wont change the cost much, I would go stainless, especially if you plan to go e85.

I think $1500 would be the starting price for a good job, there is an easy 2 days doing it all properly, grinding the inside smooth takes time but nets the extra gains. Dont skimp as crunching the fabricator and making him cut corners will cost you power.

Its not just an exhaust shop you're going to is it? A good performance workshop/fabricator is required imo.

Most exhaust shops dont purge weld stainless because they more often then not MIG. Half the time you look inside and there is pterodactyl shit all over the ID. The other half there is nothing as there isnt full penetration with the weld. I suppose its all post turbine so not often viewed as being worth the expense of using the gas and having the extra regulators/hoses/bungs set up.

Elite, If exhaust places are making dumps out of 304 then good to know. It seems to be the guys that are more into the competition car prep/race fabrication that go for the 321. So probably overkill for road cars. Though if a burner and its coil bundle use 321, LOL I know my dump will outlast the rest of the car :)

The price of a mild steel mantle bend is around the 12 dollar mark for a stainless one it's around 65 for one bend. I don't see the big huff about stainless exhaust ends up looking like mild steel anyway after dyno time it would be around the 1200 mark because of so much stuffing around

Ya set up looks nice Joey :thumbsup: hopefully you dont get my spot on the dyno haha had boost leaks with mine last Thursday so gotta go back AGAIN once i fix it pinch.gif

Yea the work he does is great, really happy with it

I'll be onto yavuz and putting the pressure on to get it done :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...