Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys ive been getting mixed answers from alot of people can someone help

i have a rb30det and a brand new garrett gt3540 now for the oil feed fitting should i run a restrictor style fitting or just a normal type ive spoken to mtq he said you can run either depending on oil pressure and my good mate STAO from hypergear said i should use a normal fitting and the restricted one will cause my turbo to die

can someone please let me know im goin crazy i have a -4an braided oil feed line

both are inverted flare type ONE WITH THE restriction is a banjo type and the non restriction is a normal turbo to -4an please help guys cheers

as for oil pressure i have no idea as the motor is not it yet and only have a rb25det oil pump

photolff.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383557-gt35-oil-restrictor-help-arghhhhh/
Share on other sites

yeah they do as most garretts do but ive been advised from ATP in usa to use a ristrictor and mtq but then i have stao tellin me it will blow the turbo saying that i had a gt3071 on my rb25 with a normal fitting and front and rear seals went on that so i dont really want to risk a $1500 brand new turbo

has anyone here had experience with out with the restriction fitting

im really looking for results on the gt35 on either a rb25 or rb30det i know the fords are prone from factory to blow the seals for this reason i just want to make sure it will be fine with a restrictor as for warranty purposes

I've been running my GT35 on a RB25 with no oil restrictor, for ~3years now with out any problems.

I asked around about this as well and was told not to use a restrictor in the oil line as it is built into the turbo.

ok cool so i just got a email back from garrett and they said it all depends on the ammount of oil pressure your engine has and to make sure you dont get more then 55-60psi goin into the turbo and that a inline restrictor cant hurt

Of course they wont be replacing the turbo under warranty anyway. Too small a restrictor will definitely cause issues and I have seen too many GT35 turbine wheels shear the shaft at the rear bearing to not run a good supply of oil to it. Just my opinion though.

ATPUSA said if i follow his recommendations of using a restrictor it will be covered under warranty as even gt35 they fit the restrict the oil im just goin crazy here cause the last few garrett BBs turbos have died do to a normal fitting as do most fords with the same fitting so im not to sure what to do here its on a rb30det yet to be fitted back into the car so i cant excatly test how much oil pressure it has

this is what they said

Jayson, have a look on the turbobygarrett.comweb site (select Turbo Tech, then Basic, then Oil and Water Plumbing) it shows the max oil pressure for a Garrett Ball Bearing is 60psi, more than 60 psi may result in oil leak issues

I would go -12 tbh, but if you already have all the -10 stuff give it a go

i had big issues with my GT35 and a 5/8" (-10) oil return and they were resolved by making the drain 3/4" (-12)

also my oil feed to the turbo has a 1mm restrictor in it just before the turbo, has had it for over a year now without any issues.

ok cool as titan so i should get a 1mm fitting thats wat ive been told

what issues did u have with the 5/8 oil drain?? the braided line i have it about 60cm long but iknow its the thickness that i need to get right

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...