Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been in the process of upgrading the whole exhaust

removed the turbos and all the gear to replace the dump pipes,

Reassembled everything, then disconnected the battery to tack a few parts of the exhaust underneath the car with a TIG.

Now its all going, only thing changed is the exhaust(all of it), but the engine is running richer than ever before, like 13.0:1 @2000rpm in the shed, and as you back off to get closer to idle, it goes off the scales rich and obviously dies.>_<

Looked at AFM voltages, they are;

ENGINE NOT RUNNING

AFM-1 --- 0.44

AFM-2 --- 0.50

ENGINE @ 1500rpm

AFM-1 --- 1.60

AFM-2 --- 0.75

I removed the afm's cleaned them out and removed the cover from the top, checked the solder joins, they look good, they were new AFM's not long ago..

reassembled and checked again,

same results,

removed AFM's and swapped top one for bottom,

same results, and the voltages stay as is/similar.

I'll take a video and see if that helps too

any help appreciated

Edited by blue_vl_t
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383599-strange-mapping-problem/
Share on other sites

Intake leak will cause the car to run rich as hell, you have measured air coming in and being given fuel for but lost before it gets to the engine. I forgot one tiny vacuum hose, it was enough to make my car idle with black smoke coming from the back. Check every single silicone connector, hose, seal, everything which helps the air stay in the intake.

Edited by SargeRX8

well i had looked a few times,

but i shoved some air in the intake this time and blocked the other, and what do you know, one air leak, i'll fix that, hopefully its all the problem is.

not sure why i always think a problem is something more complicated......

fixed the intake leak, but its running just as bad, like so bad i cant keep it running unless using 1500+rpm, took it for a drive around the block, stalled like 4 times, af mixtures are just going crazy, all over the place.

it will most likely be something simple, a matter of finding it....

ecu is PFC pro, z32 afm's

o2 sensors are removed and bunged up, also turned off on the PFC.

The wiring to the rear AFM is only just long enough to reach, so wouldn't reach the front one.

Im just making up some caps for where the afm connect to the pipework, see if there is anymore leaks, pressurize the system

Just pressurized the system with 5-10psi, looped the rocker cover breathers together, so it pressurized the whole motor, sump and all, its dead silent, no leaks, until the dipstick pops out, lol

so intake leaks, none.

I'll have to see about metering out the afm cables to the ECU, see what i come up with.

I recently had a similar problem with a Z32 that was meant to work..

I have a strange suspicion the body earth for that one is sensitive and may give a crazy effect... Mine was idling at 3.7v, yet i suspect the AFM will work fine when put into a known working case (will test tomorrow).

when using map tracer, in the shed, free revving the engine, if you hold the rpm at 2000rpm and gradually lift the throttle from the floor, the below lovely ms paint diagram shows approximately the path of the map tracer, ie which cells are being used.

IGNMapdatalogitbasemap.jpg

Edited by blue_vl_t

blow off valves hooked up and working?

though you did pressurize the intake...

well, i haven't touched them, the car was running fine about a week ago, just removed exhaust side and reassemble with new exhaust.

as you said, pressurized intake, nothing was leaking......

Stock gtr BOV's

Edited by blue_vl_t

a prize.......

i'll take you for a spin, you live close by to Kalgoorlie, lol

I actually could not find anything wrong with the wiring, and i'm an electrician.

but the plugs on the r32/r33 model is quite crap in design, you have to push the plug in further the the bolt will pull it in.

but i recon it is was just a matter of unplug the ecu and plug it in, kinda thing. lol

I do think i will have to install another muffler, the 4" is kinda loud, i am only able to find the Magnaflow ones off the shelf, anyone know if they will do much, or someone to build one custom etc??

it should do, but my crappy superwizz turboteh bleed valve has a stripped thread, loose connection, which is probably why it was running more boost than i thought it was, i removed it, and its now running a massive 12psi, woo hoo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...