Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll admit, for the first time ever, i felt like DRS was kind of fake-ish and a little gimmicky

Which is strange because i am a big supporter of it, and kers

If you take Vettel's storming performance out of the race, the front pack kind of didnt really change... except for retiree's of course... so did DRS help the leaders? I dont think so, certainly only got Webber into more and more trouble

Nevertheless, really looking forward to Austin, the youtube vids looks great

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

if you're going round the outside of someone, don't pretend they're not there and take the apex! Can't blame Maldonardo for that!

You can race Button and Alonso around the outside and even Grosjean. I think Webber was a little ruthless on Maldanado and could have left him more space at Pastor was able to hang around but Massa did come back and sort of bash up in there, then hacked it on the exit.

well he's only 10pt ahead of Nando, so he could still lose it even just by not getting enough points from the last two race finishes

say Alonso wins both the final races, and Vettel comes second in both, he'd lose the title by 4 points

You can race Button and Alonso around the outside and even Grosjean. I think Webber was a little ruthless on Maldanado and could have left him more space at Pastor was able to hang around but Massa did come back and sort of bash up in there, then hacked it on the exit.

Massa had the inside, it's his corner. Contact was made wheel to wheel so there's no doubt Massa was well and truly there... There was still plenty of room outside for Mark to use when they collided. Massa hadn't even run him out of room when they made contact! Its just that Mark was too greedy and wouldn't give an inch. Trying to go round the outside is always a risk and takes 2 willing participants. Mark's been around long enough to know who's who...

I can't believe Mark didn't get a penalty for completing the pass off the circuit, short-cutting the course, and the dangerous re-entry to the track! Add in the avoidable collision, and there's a trifecta all in the one spot - yet no penalty at all.

Same goes for turning down on Maldonardo at the same corner.Another avoidable accident Mark caused. In previous races all season long that has been a drive-through!

He even blamed Grosjean for making contact with him! I think he shoulda gone to spec-savers...

and he didn't even see the lights go out at the start!

Edited by hrd-hr30

Two more races to go for Schuey.

The good part about his comeback is a new generation got to enjoy watching a Schumacher drive in F1 and for those old enough to remember we all got a little tear in the eye with the nostalgia of it all.

Such a shame he came back with the skills of Ralf and didn't get to drive for Toyota.

Massa had the inside, it's his corner. Contact was made wheel to wheel so there's no doubt Massa was well and truly there... There was still plenty of room outside for Mark to use when they collided. Massa hadn't even run him out of room when they made contact! Its just that Mark was too greedy and wouldn't give an inch. Trying to go round the outside is always a risk and takes 2 willing participants. Mark's been around long enough to know who's who...

I can't believe Mark didn't get a penalty for completing the pass off the circuit, short-cutting the course, and the dangerous re-entry to the track! Add in the avoidable collision, and there's a trifecta all in the one spot - yet no penalty at all.

Same goes for turning down on Maldonardo at the same corner.Another avoidable accident Mark caused. In previous races all season long that has been a drive-through!

He even blamed Grosjean for making contact with him! I think he shoulda gone to spec-savers...

and he didn't even see the lights go out at the start!

Have to agree wIth that post... the commentators even said that if massa hadn't spun, Webber would've been told to give the position back... in that case the penalty should be given regardless of what happened to massa

Yes well Massa bashing has been popular, but can't be justified in this instance.

1. The kerb is the racing line... 2. its not like he was understeering off the track. Even aftert the collision which took him further off line than he would have been Massa remained on the track. And 3. the Collision was wheel to wheel. Webber was further ahead at trun in, but because he was trying to go round the outside his corner speed was lower than Massa who had the racing line. So as they collided just after the apex, Massa was on the racing line and the cars were perfectly alongside each other. It's Massa's corner.

you guys need to watch the replay again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k-5JLlIiZM&feature=player_detailpage#t=32s

the hack here is the guy who blew the start, turned into the guy he was attempting to pass round the outside the first time, then tried it again later without leaving room for the car on the racing line, shortcuts the track and completes the pass off course, cuts right across the other guy's nose as he rejoins the track straight to the racing line with no regard for any other drivers, and ultimately blames Grosjean for hitting him at the end as well! Complete hack.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Tony Fernandes has revealed that he will step down as Caterham team principal before the end of the 2012 season.

The Malaysian tycoon have been at the helm of the squad since they made their debut under the Lotus Racing banner in 2010, but he had always maintained that he didn't want to stay in the job on the long-term.

The 48-year-old, along with deputy chairman Dato' Kamarudin Meranun, has decided now is the right time to move on and focus on developing his road car business.

"On the racing side we have come to the conclusion that it is better if someone else takes over the team principal role to move forward," Fernandes said in an interview with Autocar.

"We are definitely better at business than finding tenths of seconds around a lap.

"It was right for us to lead the team initially and set a template of how it should be. That vision is now set and the team is ready to move forward to the midfield."

Although he refused to reveal who his successor will be, Fernandes says it will be someone in the Formula One circle.

"I know who it will be - and can tell you that today as I had confirmation earlier," he said.

"[but] I cannot tell you their name yet. All I can say is that they are from within F1."

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8229143/Fernandes-to-step-down-as-team-boss

good news there.

Yep, after watching that vid im convinced that nothing more than a racing incident

the initial tyre contact, while being unfriendly, only serves to send mark off track while massa is free to continue as usual

only once massa over rides the second kerb does he send himself into a spin

as per usual he'll use any excuse to shield himself from the truth of his own inability

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...