Jump to content
SAU Community

  

110 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I'm fabing a plenum up for myself. It's going onto a rb25 and iv never made one for a 25 before. Done a few for rb20 but the 25 seems to be totally different in design. If it turns out to work really well ill make up a few.This is a serious question i don't want stupid answers as I'll be using this info to build the plenum. I'll explain later after I see what people have to say cheers everyone

Edited by Bsa
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384598-street-car-peak-power-where-is-best/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

building a plenum is easy thing to do but to get it right is a whole different story................best to buy one like a greddy or if you got the cash get a hypertune item worth every cent bit bias as i have one........................i played with inlets so many times its not funny had 5 different set-ups in the end up using a late model magna provided the best results you bsee the 2nd link........ mate scott at insight me and him did alot of r&d on them for my la lancer with 2.6t sigma motor heres one of the twin throttle body inlet i got fab'd up with full custom spun ram tubes from jnt,ford t/b.s etc.........

best to stick with stock with larger throttle body or spend the big bucks on a inlet thats had r&d and proven its self.......sorry if sound rude but been done that path...........theres a maths to building inlets they why car companies invested big $$$$$$$$$$ into r&d

custom twin thrott;le body inlet

http://rides.webshot...103472179sJBhjJ

this mod'd factory item with the thrttle body relocted was the best out of the lot

http://rides.webshot...578631407aLIaHl

Edited by stocker

Done tones of research and have learned all the mathamatics behind desining one. the plasma man plenum don't do much other then store more air then stock. The reason for more response is the fact the air doesn't turn back on itself so when the valve closes the air that wasn't consumed pulses back up the runner causing turbulence. So removing the bend allows the air to pulse back into the chamber faster causing less turbulence so quicker response very simple really. So plenum size is the next thing smaller smaller the plenum gives more resonce due to increased velocity. larger the plenum means more air up top more power but less midrange. The stock runners are designed for midrange but also high rpm well untill stock limiter. My old boy is a mathematical genius seriously can work out anything so he is helping on the design. I forget to mention I will be utilizing the bottom runners so no mods are really required just need to get flow to the runners equal

Edited by Bsa

Obviously most of the time ur revs are goin to be below 4000 rpm,

I voted 4000 to 7500 cause that's where I'll want my power will be

It's not realistic to have decent power under 4 for my set up and I'd rather not rev the ass out of it

Just my justification for my choice

Did you only half read what I wrote. I understand the stock manifold is capable of the job I need but lets face it looks like shit. Forward facing looks so much neater and it improves pedal feel and maybe a bit more torque y not. Mathematics is the major factor in design your dreaming if its not. And yes a have access to getting it flow tested and all that which will be done

Edited by Bsa

mathematics for runner length and plenum volume yes, but that wont tell you if the distribution is even.

By getting it flow tested, how many prototypes are you going to make and test before it is right? (you will need to test on the dyno too)

I learnt a long time ago to leave all that stuff to the companies that pour $$$$$$$$$$$ into R&D on these things

Unless you change the runner lengths you will not move the peak torque or power points pretty much anywhere at all. The resonances in question have to do with the tuned length of the runners and little else. If you have a big plenum volume, you will make a little more power. You will also have a better chance of not getting poor distribution, but that's only from giving the air more room to move at a lower velocity. A little plenum will make less power and you will stand a better chance of getting poor distribution because of constricting the flow and forcing high velocities past the first couple/few runners. A big plenum will give soggier throttle response. A little plenum will give sharper throttle response. But even those differences are small - there's a limit both to how small you can make it and how big you can make it and still fit in everything you need. That size range doesn't cover a lot of difference in response or total power. Curvature or otherwise of the runners will likewise have such a little effect on anything that you would be hard pressed to tell the difference there either. I seriously think that you are fooling yourself if you think you have any chance of affecting much other than flow distribution between runners.

That's y iv taken aspects from all the leaders. Tell me how many tests have been done on a 300 dollar eBay special fck all it works so people buy it. I can do all the work myself won't cost much as my mate will flow test it for me and I get the alloy for cost. I'll make as many as I need to get it right

Unless you change the runner lengths you will not move the peak torque or power points pretty much anywhere at all. The resonances in question have to do with the tuned length of the runners and little else. If you have a big plenum volume, you will make a little more power. You will also have a better chance of not getting poor distribution, but that's only from giving the air more room to move at a lower velocity. A little plenum will make less power and you will stand a better chance of getting poor distribution because of constricting the flow and forcing high velocities past the first couple/few runners. A big plenum will give soggier throttle response. A little plenum will give sharper throttle response. But even those differences are small - there's a limit both to how small you can make it and how big you can make it and still fit in everything you need. That size range doesn't cover a lot of difference in response or total power. Curvature or otherwise of the runners will likewise have such a little effect on anything that you would be hard pressed to tell the difference there either. I seriously think that you are fooling yourself if you think you have any chance of affecting much other than flow distribution between runners.

This x 100

plus, any thing regarding manifold design for Atmo engines, tear it up and burn it, because it means precisely shit in a forced induction application.

Providing everything flows well enough not to restrict airflow than runner length wont affect power, just response.

ie a long runner intake will get the engine breathing heavier at low revs, hence getting the turbo on song sooner.

Which unless you are purely doing it for looks the standard plenum is the way to go.

iirc you are going for a GT30 or T67, not big enough in my books to warrant spending shit loads of money on a fancy plenum, if you want every possible ounce of power out of the turbo than yes custom plenum with ram tubes and centre feed large volume plenum etc etc + lots of head work + custom cams + f**king about with injector placement.

you are obviously capable of some decent fab skills, why not try a Greddy plenum and make up some spacers to play with the runner lengths?

I understand I won't make a huge difference but anything is a gain if it creates better flow also. But at the end of the day most people buy them cos they look better most people don't care what it does as long as it looks good and adds better response they are happy

If I fail then I will. I made one for my 20 cut the flange off shortened the runner by 20 mm and put the plenum I made on car was more responsive and seemed slightly more torquey I'm not after every bit of power I'm just interested if a simple thing can aid. Also if I can do it myself I will I hate buying things I'm capable of even if it ends up cheaper. I dont see why you guys are sitting there telling me to not bother one day you could buy one. hks didn't just pop out of no where one bloke decided he could do it better and now it's global I'm not saying I could get to that point but if I can do it better then some then I will and have extra cash at the end of the week because of it everything starts out just a idea

the alloy bits and pieces will cost jack all but the flow testing,dyno time,gas for welder,getting custom velocity stacks or bellmouth it will cost more then you think to build a quaiilty manifold

hypertune do a rb25 inlet.............save on all the time fabicating and all the head stress

http://www.hypertune.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88&Itemid=84

No one is getting me I can make all my own bit and prices. just material costs. I don't mean to be rude but all I'm asking is for people's preferences for a street car not tell me I'm stupid for having a go

It depends on where ur turbo and cam setup will be making power/torque aswell. Best to match it all together.

Oh and dyno testing is no problem. Ill draw up a mortgage agreement now so we can start. Your gonna make me rich :P

I picked 3 to 65, for the street you want early responce I feel, mine isnt coming on till 4.5 which is fine on the track were you can keep it on song but for the street mine isnt ideal, a stock SS with get me of the line and unlike the track on the street I cannot then blow by him when I hit 3rd, unless your a knob like the young blokes around here who think the road is their own private race track.

No offence Im just adding a little vent.:cheers:

Haha I I'm sure I will jez but If it works then I might get lucky. Back to back runs will be happening with both plenums. It's not like I'm doing the impossible

Yep. Keep ur current piping so u can test against the stock plenum too.

What throttle body u gonna run

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers)
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
    • OK, Step 3, if you need to remove the valve body, either to replace it, the TCM, or to do a more complete drain.  First, you need to disconnect the TCM input wires, they are about half way up the transmission on the drivers side. One plug and the wires are out of the way, but there is also a spring clip that stops the socket from sliding back into the transmission. On my car the spring clip was easy to get, but the socket was really stuck in the o-ring of the transmission housing and took some.....persuasion. You can see both the plug to remove (first) and the spring clip (second) in this pic Incidentally, right next to the plug, you can see where the casting has allowance for a dispstick/filler which Nissan decided not to provide. there is a cap held on with a 6mm head bolt that you can remove to overfill it (AMS recommend a 1.5l overfill). Final step before the big mess, remove the speed sensor that is clipped to the valve body at the rear of the box.  Then removal of the Valve Body. For this the USDM Q50 workshop manual has a critical diagram: There are a billion bolts visible. Almost all of them do not need to be removed, just the 14 shown on the diagram. Even so, I both removed one extra, and didn't check which length bolt came from which location (more on that later....). Again it is worth undoing the 4 corners first, but leaving them a couple of turns in to hold the unit up....gravity is not your friend here and trans oil will be going everywhere. Once the corners are loose but still in remove all the other 10 bolts, then hold the valve body up with 1 hand while removing the final 4. Then, everything just comes free easily, or like in my case you start swearing because that plug is stuck in the casing. Done, the valve body and TCM are out
    • OK, so if you are either going for the bigger fluid change or are changing the valve body which includes the Transmission Control Module (TCM), first you should have both a new gasket 31397-1XJ0A and a torque wrench that can work down to 8Nm (very low, probably a 1/4 drive one). You can probably get by without either, but I really didn't want to pull it all apart together due to a leak. First, you now need that big oil pan. The transmission pan is 450 long x 350 wide, and it will probably leak on all sides, so get ready for a mess. There are 24x 6mm headed bolts holding the pan on. I undid the 2 rear corners, then screwed those bolts back in a couple of turns to let the pan go low at that end, then removed all the middle bolts on each side. Then, undo the front corner bolts slowly while holding the pan up, and 80% of the fluid will head out the rear. From there, remove the remaining bolts and the pan is off. You can see it is still dripping oil absolutely everywhere...it dripped all night.... I got another couple of litres when I removed the pan, and then another few when I removed the valve body - all up another 4l on top of the 3 already dropped in step 1.
×
×
  • Create New...