Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

Building an RB25. Build is in the process, bottom end is done, time for the head. (stock with tomei poncams and cam gears)

Now talking about the head. What would be the better option and why? What should I be weary of? suggestions?

1. RB25 head, ported and polished with a solid lifter conversion. Decent cams.

2. RB25 neo head, ported and polished. Decent cams. (have been told by several people that these are the best heads of the 3)

3. RB26 head, ported and polished, again decent cams.

by saying decent cams, im undecided on what I want at the moment, but am after that nice big angry lumpy idle) Procams 270s or so. After the new head is done am planning to spin to 9000rpm.

About the car. CP forged 20thou over pistons, manley forged rods, machined balanced etc etc few other odds and ends such as mains girdle, jun oil pump, lewis sump, ross balancer etc etc... Custom exhaust manifold, BW 63mm turbo(am going bigger turbo if need be), plazmaman plenum and t/b. Trust cooler, 3.5in exhaust. Haltec platinum pro ecu, supporting fuel system, running E85. Power, maybe asking alot BUT I want 650/700rwhp. originally made 510rwhp at 1.7bar. Love to see 2bar and 700hp. Its all still a work in progress.

Help and suggestions greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/386679-rb25-head-questions/
Share on other sites

I'm using the 25 head with a supertech solid lifter conversion simply because I already had the complete hot and cold side ready to bolt on. If I were starting from scratch I would probably use a 26 head Just to save on the cost of the conversion but given the hassle of getting rid of all the existing hot and cold side bolt ons and sourcing 26 stuff I found this the easiest way.

In saying that I am more than happy with the current setup, Once the conversion is done you have for all intents and purposes a 26 head which opens up a whole new world of cam shaft options etc. I am currently running tomei 10.25 lift with staggerred duration inlet and exhaust cams. Dan of ERD fame has now developed a vct setup for the 26 head and even better he can apply this to my converted 25 head because most of the gear is already there.

We will be pursuing this setup early in the new year.

There's my experience on the subject. Good luck with which ever way you go.

Neo heads are the best if you are going custom plenum or staying with the stock inlet and plenum. Can make 1000hp on that gear if you don't want to change it from standard....just port match the inlet to the head you have. The neo heads are solid lifter already but the springs are not going to do the job so a set of supertech double valve springs (I'm 99% sure they do them for neo). You won't make 700hp on a 63mm turbo. You might almost maybe almost get there on a 67 but that would be pushing more than 2 bar I think.

Neo is better also because you can keep the VCT. We do a VCT camshaft set to suit and will be better than any other bolt in option for a Neo for that turbo setup.

Forget port and polish, most people don't know wtf they are doing and the ones that do won't tell you how. Just clean up the intake and make the bowl area less sharp and daggy, most benefits from smoothing the edges of the combustion chamber area around the valve entry and exit to remove the high point that Nissan put there. Don't touch the squish area. It's there for a reason. Removing it is not only a waste of time but you will lose HP. If you want a good V8, port the squish area, those pushrod dinosaurs are so inefficient they'll shit hp out the doorhandles instead of the wheels.

Turning the boost up will not net you any more gains from the amount you made previously. The valve springs just cannot handle the pressure and you will lose efficiency there until new springs are in.

The rest of the setup looks good. By mains girdle do you mean one of the aftermarket billet ones?

They are truly a waste of space. Japanese and Local RB's have been making reliable 800-1500 hp on standard girdles for decades. Don't fix what isn't broken. I have only seen two main bearing failures on an RB. 1 was when the girdle wasn't tightened down and 2 was someone clamping a gearbox up against clutch assembly then forcing the crank to turn when it was seized due to improper fitting. 10k and the mains were shagged starting from the thrust outwards.

It has never been a problem on RB's and never will. If you are busting main bearings, then you have some other problem that needs fixing

If the bottom end is already build with this then leave it, it costs too much to wind back the clock now.

The trust cooler - is it a ~100mm item?

Apart from the aforementioned changes you sound like you are on the right track. I love seeing a good RB25 crack 500kw. Go with the bigger turbo :D:thumbsup:

Neo heads are the best if you are going custom plenum or staying with the stock inlet and plenum. Can make 1000hp on that gear if you don't want to change it from standard....just port match the inlet to the head you have. The neo heads are solid lifter already but the springs are not going to do the job so a set of supertech double valve springs (I'm 99% sure they do them for neo). You won't make 700hp on a 63mm turbo. You might almost maybe almost get there on a 67 but that would be pushing more than 2 bar I think.

Neo is better also because you can keep the VCT. We do a VCT camshaft set to suit and will be better than any other bolt in option for a Neo for that turbo setup.

Forget port and polish, most people don't know wtf they are doing and the ones that do won't tell you how. Just clean up the intake and make the bowl area less sharp and daggy, most benefits from smoothing the edges of the combustion chamber area around the valve entry and exit to remove the high point that Nissan put there. Don't touch the squish area. It's there for a reason. Removing it is not only a waste of time but you will lose HP. If you want a good V8, port the squish area, those pushrod dinosaurs are so inefficient they'll shit hp out the doorhandles instead of the wheels.

Turning the boost up will not net you any more gains from the amount you made previously. The valve springs just cannot handle the pressure and you will lose efficiency there until new springs are in.

The rest of the setup looks good. By mains girdle do you mean one of the aftermarket billet ones?

They are truly a waste of space. Japanese and Local RB's have been making reliable 800-1500 hp on standard girdles for decades. Don't fix what isn't broken. I have only seen two main bearing failures on an RB. 1 was when the girdle wasn't tightened down and 2 was someone clamping a gearbox up against clutch assembly then forcing the crank to turn when it was seized due to improper fitting. 10k and the mains were shagged starting from the thrust outwards.

It has never been a problem on RB's and never will. If you are busting main bearings, then you have some other problem that needs fixing

If the bottom end is already build with this then leave it, it costs too much to wind back the clock now.

The trust cooler - is it a ~100mm item?

Apart from the aforementioned changes you sound like you are on the right track. I love seeing a good RB25 crack 500kw. Go with the bigger turbo :D:thumbsup:

Yeah I figured the BW 63mm will be too small, ive started looking at the EFR 91-80 after talking with a mate.

The trust cooler is 100mm thick.

Im leaning toward staying with the stock RB25 head because ive already got the exhaust manifold and things for it. Unless the exhaust manifold is interchangeble with the neo?

the plazmaman plenum bolts onto the lower half of the stock inlet manifold so if that bolts onto the neo thats half the battle won.

As for springs am looking at a set of tomei spings. Another mate also has a set of race springs and 290* camshafts that could be interesting, but i'd be interested to hear on your VCT set up??

Yeah its a billet mains cap girdle. I only got it figuring it will help with keeping the thing together, first time (well now 2nd) ive built a jap motor. Its still in its wrapper and might stay there lol. Was a peice of mind type thing.

Id rather a highly strung RB25 instead of a RB25/26/30 conversion or stroker. standard stroke/displacement carrying 30psi and big revs is just the way to go.

Thanks for ya help Elite.

Yeah I figured the BW 63mm will be too small, ive started looking at the EFR 91-80 after talking with a mate.

The trust cooler is 100mm thick.

Im leaning toward staying with the stock RB25 head because ive already got the exhaust manifold and things for it. Unless the exhaust manifold is interchangeble with the neo?

the plazmaman plenum bolts onto the lower half of the stock inlet manifold so if that bolts onto the neo thats half the battle won.

As for springs am looking at a set of tomei spings. Another mate also has a set of race springs and 290* camshafts that could be interesting, but i'd be interested to hear on your VCT set up??

Yeah its a billet mains cap girdle. I only got it figuring it will help with keeping the thing together, first time (well now 2nd) ive built a jap motor. Its still in its wrapper and might stay there lol. Was a peice of mind type thing.

Id rather a highly strung RB25 instead of a RB25/26/30 conversion or stroker. standard stroke/displacement carrying 30psi and big revs is just the way to go.

Thanks for ya help Elite.

Exhaust manifold is the same, inlet manifold is different at the head but same a the plenum so you should be sweet there.

Having it already solid lifter makes things a lot easier.

What lb specs are the Tomei springs?

Exhaust manifold is the same, inlet manifold is different at the head but same a the plenum so you should be sweet there.

Having it already solid lifter makes things a lot easier.

What lb specs are the Tomei springs?

Sweet, thanks for the info mate. Might have to whack the car on a trailer and bring it up for a visit lol.

I was looking at Lewis Race engines, at his RB heads.. http://www.lewisengines.com.au/category25_1.htm

Seems like a fairly good base to start with. Am also looking at oversize valves. I just want the head done once and done right.

I've got the Tomei B type springs. not sure on lb specs off the top of my head.

Does cam selection change with neo heads? I want big cams, as i said in previous posts atleast 270s if not maybe the 290s from my mate. (hes not using them)

Why would the neo head have any affect on the bottom end? they are a generic RB 86.5mm CP piston.

Yep you need to get CP to make you custom pistons to suit the Neo engine, none of their off the shelf items will work.

Because the combustion chamber in a Neo head is ~10 cc smaller than in a normal RB25 and they use different pistons.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...