Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Price $6500 (willing to negotiate in person)

Located in canberra but would be happy to organise transport with buyer.

great car for daily duties or great platform for a track car

car does not run the best under load at the moment because the Haltech maffless ECU needs the fuel mapping to be tuned properly but i have been driving it around town and keeping it under 3500rpm and it is not an issue that needs addressing right away.

it went in for a roadworthy inspection last week but got knocked back because of the front mount intercooler and atmospheric blow off valve. it would cost about $300 to buy the standard parts to pass rego but there are plenty of members willing to lend out bits.

any questions please email me at [email protected] or txt me on 0422626173

R32 GTST Manual. Wine red (AN0)

RB20DET

RB25 turbo 13psi

Split dump exhaust with 2 mufflers and a silencer for rego( not to loud but free flowing)

195kw atw

Haltech Computer

GTR front bar

GTR wing

Coilovers front, Nismo rear suspension. Solid mounted rear.

18x8 front and 18x9.5 rear Starcorp Impul

Custom cushion button clutch.

Alpine Head unit, 7in fold-out dvd/tv screen. Subwoofer. Focal front splits and tweeters. Sony rear speakers.

Hicas lock bar, all lines and solenoids removed.

have a set of brand new rear wheel bearings and the standard intake piping and hosing

Recently done rear brake pads, oil,coolant, spark plugs, fuel filter and injector cleaner and brand new 550cca battery

post-85840-0-38410500-1326255031_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-98329400-1326255048_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-31071600-1326255062_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-62877800-1326255081_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-94591800-1326255103_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-03420000-1326255121_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-27776900-1326255137_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-28562000-1326255155_thumb.jpg

post-85840-0-19763700-1326255173_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387889-act-r32-gtst-type-m-6500/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

fuelling issues have been fixed so now it drives great. at first i thought it was the fuel mapping but it turned out that the fuel pump was shot. it now has a new Bosch 040 with new relays.

once it passes its roadworthy inspection i will put the front mount intercooler back on along with the BOV and maffless intake pipe and take it for a dyno evaluation.

how do i edit the main add because i need to change some information

Fwiw, I knew this car from around 2005 - 2010. A friend owned it for a couple years, then sold it to another friend who later sold it, probably to this guy?

It was a good honest car back then. And always looked after. I've probably done 10,000 + kms in that passenger seat...

  • 2 weeks later...

lol im still wanting to see the dyno sheet for that 195 atthe wheels :whistling:

it's really not that unbelievable seeing as it has everything you just said plus an rb25 turbo.....

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...