Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all.

Just compiling my parts that I need for future upgrade.

I have stumbled a cross these

http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/deatschwerks-flow-fuel-injector-750cc-nissan-skyline-rb26dett-8902-p-108463.html

Just wondering if anyone here knows anything about them? The fuel pump I hear is good but I find nothing in google about the injectors.

I'm leaning towards these mainly because sard 700cc injectors are discontinued and I do not wish to go 800cc because I have to solder new plugs on.

Whereas above said injectors are drop in see ya later.

Thoughts? Opinions?

Thanks

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The DW 740cc injectors used to be high flows. DW have since told me they have these manufactures specifically for them and they are not high flows.(This is atleast true for the side feed injectors not sure about the top feeds)

I have a set of 740's will let you know when I finish my car and get it tuned.

Plenty of EVO's 35 GTRS are using DW injectors so they can not be that bad

Hmmm... Haha

I'm pretty sure these are high flow. But what do I know haha.

Guilt toy, of you wouldn't mind, do you care to elaborate why they are so terrible on you're eyes?

Of the other platform tuners are running them then they can't have such a bad rep.

I have a set of Deatschwerks 550s which I ran in my RB25DET and now in my RB30/25 going fine.

If I get my engine forged and go to E85 and big kw I would upgrade to ID1000 or ID2000 but not because there was anything wrong with my Deatschwerks.

I'm running a set in my R34 GTT and they work fine, no complaints from the tuner either. I liked the idea of direct fitment and retaining the quad orifice spray design.

I'm running a set in my R34 GTT and they work fine, no complaints from the tuner either. I liked the idea of direct fitment and retaining the quad orifice spray design.

+1 running 600cc's in my R34 GTT with 340HP atw, Idle is smooth as and they work well on the power end.

Tuner was very happy with them.

if only the forum had a tag function like FB..... ARTZ needs to see this

guilt toy your being sarcastic right?

Lol...yeah i see it...some reason my crappy phone doesnt want me to log in...

But anyways, after harrassing a few members on here (:cheers: guys) for info and asking Trent, Im getting the DWs..1000cc FTW... :thumbsup:

just trying to find out how much postage from the US is gunna be as we speak..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...