Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so I had to rotate my comp housing on my turbo the other day and noticed the seal ( the one that seals the comp housing to the core ) is buggered is it safe to use silastic or a form a gasket goo type substance ?

Any feedback appreciated

generally sikaflex and 2way tape can fix anything in the right quantities :P

the real answer is a no unfortunately.. not recommended. But im sure the oring u broke isnt worth much, check ebay :thumbsup:

Red gasket goo on the external gate outlet...slightly caught fire on the dyno. Perhaps not the best thing to use that close to the hot side of an engine if there is oxygen present.

A case of, can you smell something burning?? Umm yep.

if its just an o-ring??

go see any bearing/o-ring shoppe. they should be able to sort you out. most silicone's are VERY heat resistant, and how they catch fire is a little beyond me. i have the red stuff holding the extractors together on my Bug. its gotten hot, and a little bit white over the years, but never on fire...i assume its pretty hot there as it gets a nice glow going on at full song (no turbo attached tho....yet)

It's not an Rubber o ring as such it's a ring but it's proper gasket papery stuff hahahah

And discopotato I can get them from mtq but I don't get much time to go that way so I was just swing if I could use what I had instead of going there but thanks either way lads

The standard one maybe Blake but this is a highflow turbo and it's definetly low quality gasket paper cause it fell to bits hahahah

but I have a spare turbo here so I might see if the factory steel one fits the highflow

Cheers for the input

The standard one maybe Blake but this is a highflow turbo and it's definetly low quality gasket paper cause it fell to bits hahahah

but I have a spare turbo here so I might see if the factory steel one fits the highflow

Cheers for the input

seems a bit suss who highflowed it? wack the proper seal on there should fit if its the same turbo

Usually when you get to machined surface clamped together they will seal when clamped mate I would assume that it's the same thing with the Garret turbos .

The old v6 commos vn to be serries 2 never ran exaust mani gaskets because they were two machined surfaces so they sealed well enOugh with the right clamp pressure .

And Blake it wa done by one of the boys at mtq as an after hours thing hahahah so I'd say that's why the seal didn't get replaced an when I rotated the housing it just fudged up on me lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...