Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just need some opinions on this,

would there be any benefit or even issues with a 4inch intake comming off a gtx3076 with 4inch anti surge compressor housing?

thinking of having a 4inch intake then reducing down to 3inch and putting filter down in the front bumper,

so second question is will the afm being X distance from turbo and having 4inch pipe behind it be an issue with idle/running?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/390439-afm-position-and-intake-size/
Share on other sites

4 inch intake and map sensor, run the AFM in the hot pipe or mount the AFM in a 4 inch pipe. Any other way and you may as well run 80mm to the turbo imo.

so run the afm just after the turbo outlet and before the intercooler and then use 4inch from turbo to filter plus use a 4inch filter pod , yes?

ok cool , ill make sure its 40mm atleast,

my thinking with the 4inch pipe and 4inch filter was that at say 20psi or later on at 24psi , it might give greater response and more power, similar to having a 3inch or 4inch dump pipe when the turbine is only 60mm it may squeeze a little more out of the setup.

GTX3076R flows a fair chunk more than its little brother. Not only that, but those fancy compressor wheels dont come alive until after 25psi.

Saw a video of one push ~500rwhp. I think it was a red or pink S14?

I thought afm's didnt like being on the discharge side of things?

Ty.

afm before the turbo is fine, just use a 4"-3" reducer somewhere between the turbo and afm. aslong as theres a bend and atleast ~400+mm between the turbo and afm it'll be fine.

+1

Will be fine going from 3"-->4"

It's how virtually all other set-ups do it

How much power you going for

Id be happy with 300-320rwkw with a huge torquey midrange, just ordered tomei cams, and later might go E85 with some forged pistons.

is a few weeks off tuning, hoping the HD exedy will hang on too, a few issues to deal with yet.

so has anyone put the air flow in the cooling line and ran 20psi without issues?

Edited by SliverS2

so has anyone put the air flow in the cooling line and ran 20psi without issues?

yes people have, but other people have completely busted them doing this too. leave it in the standard position.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...