Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just need some opinions on this,

would there be any benefit or even issues with a 4inch intake comming off a gtx3076 with 4inch anti surge compressor housing?

thinking of having a 4inch intake then reducing down to 3inch and putting filter down in the front bumper,

so second question is will the afm being X distance from turbo and having 4inch pipe behind it be an issue with idle/running?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/390439-afm-position-and-intake-size/
Share on other sites

4 inch intake and map sensor, run the AFM in the hot pipe or mount the AFM in a 4 inch pipe. Any other way and you may as well run 80mm to the turbo imo.

so run the afm just after the turbo outlet and before the intercooler and then use 4inch from turbo to filter plus use a 4inch filter pod , yes?

ok cool , ill make sure its 40mm atleast,

my thinking with the 4inch pipe and 4inch filter was that at say 20psi or later on at 24psi , it might give greater response and more power, similar to having a 3inch or 4inch dump pipe when the turbine is only 60mm it may squeeze a little more out of the setup.

GTX3076R flows a fair chunk more than its little brother. Not only that, but those fancy compressor wheels dont come alive until after 25psi.

Saw a video of one push ~500rwhp. I think it was a red or pink S14?

I thought afm's didnt like being on the discharge side of things?

Ty.

afm before the turbo is fine, just use a 4"-3" reducer somewhere between the turbo and afm. aslong as theres a bend and atleast ~400+mm between the turbo and afm it'll be fine.

+1

Will be fine going from 3"-->4"

It's how virtually all other set-ups do it

How much power you going for

Id be happy with 300-320rwkw with a huge torquey midrange, just ordered tomei cams, and later might go E85 with some forged pistons.

is a few weeks off tuning, hoping the HD exedy will hang on too, a few issues to deal with yet.

so has anyone put the air flow in the cooling line and ran 20psi without issues?

Edited by SliverS2

so has anyone put the air flow in the cooling line and ran 20psi without issues?

yes people have, but other people have completely busted them doing this too. leave it in the standard position.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...