Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if i had a car that ran 9 sec 1/4 mile, i wouldn't give a flying fcuk how quick it was on the street !! who cares ?

drag racing is from 0 to 400m, not from a green light to the end of the track, and a car that runs 9's on the track pulls around 220 to 240 km/h !!!! who the fcuk would do that on the street ?

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if i had a car that ran 9 sec 1/4 mile, i wouldn't give a flying fcuk how quick it was on the street !! who cares ?

drag racing is from 0 to 400m, not from a green light to the end of the track, and a car that runs 9's on the track pulls around 220 to 240 km/h !!!! who the fcuk would do that on the street ?

"Drag Racing" is who gets to the 1/4 mile first....end of story

How fast you can do 1/4 mile is a different story.Munro has covered it pretty well

I've decided to see how the other side of drag racing lives and I'm entering my first bracket meet this Saturday at WSID. Lucky I don't have a 9 second car!!

Let's see what there is to this reaction time business :-)

Adrian

its whoever gets to the end first after the light drops..

what do you mean by "spooling up?" if you mean spooling up the turbo until the lights go green isn't that irrelevent as its your definitely not sitting there at idle *until* the green xmas tree light goes on in any car.

do you mean from idle revs or something?

:confused:

In any situation, whether at the strip or "elsewhere" you generally know you are about to be dragging and prepare things. Even if you're on a rolling start, your turbo would probably be "spooled up" anyhow.. so i can't see the situation where suddenly you both have to start at "idle" speed.

Ninja you mstne understand , when your at the drags you see turbo cars for examples VL's etc etc after the green light they sit at the lights getting some boost spooling up there turbo with antilag then launching on the perfect boost for launch on that car...id rather a car that can just go there and run a 9 like a GT-R and not sit on the lights for 6 years.... then take off.

launch assistance is another can of worms I think :mad:

If Leewah can show what his car is capable of with stock interior (is he still running the full interior?) and can drive to the track and do a 9 (even if it is a high 9) i think a new record will be set, at least in my eyes anyhow.

A half a second is obviously a lot longer amount of time than you realise.

Isn't he still half a second away from the 9?

Oh, and don't start quoting power figures at me... They mean nothing without timeslips :mad:

Adrian

Competition drag racing involves more than just timing from crossing the beams at the start, to getting to the finish line. Consistancy, reaction time etc are all just as important as ET. Especially in dial your own racing. Where RT and consistancy is pretty much everything.

Getting a bit of topic.............

A half a second is obviously a lot longer amount of time than you realise.

Isn't he still half a second away from the 9?

Oh, and don't start quoting power figures at me... They mean nothing without timeslips  

Adrian

When he got 10.47 or whatever it was, this was before the engine was rebuilt, and the happy gas added - and i think around 200rwkw less, and nearly 10 months ago now. So it should be capable of something a reasonable amount better. Im not sure of the exact configuration at the moment, or whether he even has plans to drag race it before sale. But yeah, hope he does :) But no, the power figure may not be a true indicator either.

I'm aware of the all the dimishing returns for gains, etc, etc when getting lower and lower into the 11 and 10sec bracket. Guess the NOS that makes it a little easier, but its either that or methanol by about that point.

Maybe in a position like this it would be better to run the time then claim the car has ran that time, as doing it and talking about it are 2 big different things, with the new power comes new problems ie gearbox and traction etc etc so just because someone has XXX more power then when they ran xxx doesn't automaticaly mean they will be that much quicker straight away

Brett

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like of the guys (and girls?) around here would have only gone to a street meet or test and tune, and therefore are complaining about the cars spooling after the green light. However, as has been pointed out by one or two knowledgable people, there is a huge difference between an official drag meet and a street meet/test and tune.

The whole idea of a test and tune is just that - to test out different techniques, configurations and settings on a car. But when it comes to an offical drag event, then anyone who sits on the line still spooling after the green goes will invariably be the loser. I don't think anyone will argue on the contrary. As long as it covers the standing 1320ft between 9.000 and 9.999 seconds, then I don't see how anyone could deny a car's 9 second ET as being a 9 second ET. It is still a 9 second car at the track. Forget about the street.

As for reaction times, they actually do count. First past the line in heads up racing wins. Reaction time also affects bracket racing with reaction time affecting the final result.

Sure te VL's that sit there are spooling are 9sec cars, if there at a regular test & tune then they can afford to sit at the line as long as they like to get it to the required boost level there after to get the ultimate time.

But when it comes to proper real world competition drag racing under ANDRA regs then they would surely run on a pro tree.

For those that dont know what a pro tree is well thats where the VL lets say gets the a handicap start and gets the green light 1st while the lets say GTR has to wait a couple of secs before he would get the green so the VL would have its green light and would be spooling while the GTR is still waiting to go.

So in fact if that was the case and 1 of these 9sec vl's were racing something like leewahs GTR for instance on a pro tree then the handicap the VL would get would have it to its desired boost level for take off by the time the GTR owner gets the green so they would basically be takin off around the same time.

You have to remember all these 9sec VL's run very large non roller bearing turbo's with large exhaust housings so once they start catching onto the roller bearing turbo train then i think alot of these prolonged spooling times will be alot less if not non existent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...