Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just a quick question. and feel free to give me grief and send me in the right direction, as i couldn't find the answers i was after.

which is best for a standardish setup (standard turbo R33), combined dump and wastegate? or the separate wastegate pipe till further down?

which then leads to the next question? pros and cons of using a one piece dump/front, or 2 piece? and does it really matter what brand it is?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394003-frontdump-pipe/
Share on other sites

The belmouth front pipe in mild steel seem to be more popular (turbo to cat one piece) some believe the split dump pipe can jam up the flapper on the wastegate

The original split dump pipes did jam the flapper. But as far as im aware they have been fiddled with and work fine. Havnt seen any complaints since the 1st batch. I had one. Biggest PITA ever. But im guessing mine was the 1st batch of them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394003-frontdump-pipe/#findComment-6265195
Share on other sites

is this a specific brand you guys are talking about? or in general?

now that you guys mention it, the bell mouth is generally mild steel and the other is stainless isnt it? could the production cost with said materials be the whole and sole reason for the design difference?

and no reason not to buy a 1 piece? not that i need to remove half the engine just to get the 1 piece thru?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394003-frontdump-pipe/#findComment-6265220
Share on other sites

The JJR ones.

But anyone that sells the same style. Probly comes from the same place.

Nothing wrong with the one piece ones. I'd go for mild steel anyway. The stainless ruined my narrowband sensor thread, and bent all the bolts holding the thing to the turbine housing.

This has made me not ever want another stainless steel anything near my turbo lol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394003-frontdump-pipe/#findComment-6265229
Share on other sites

It is my considered opinion that keeping the wastegate gases from messing up the turbine exit gases in the most critical region (ie, immediately after the turbine outlet) is very worthwhile.  The ideal turbine outlet is a nice smooth conical expansion from the outlet size up to some big size (like 3"), but of course no one has the room to do it like that.  For a start, they usually have to bend straight away.  Given this, I can;t see why you'd be happy to make the turbine exit development region any worse by spraying wastegate flow directly across it.  Seems daft.

The little short split wastegate dumps are probably a waste of time.  They poke the wastegate gases back in pretty close to the top.  Seems silly just to make them a simple replacement for the factory dump.  I got one of the cheap JJR long split ones (dump and front pipe in one) and it noticeably improved the spool response of the car.  Absolutely no clearance problems with the flap valve.  I didn't test it against a bellmouth, so I can't say for sure that it is better than a bellmouth, but I can't see how it would be worse.  Any time a Skyline is making power, the wastegate is open.  So spraying wastegate gases in cannot be a good thing for peak power.  The turbine exit part of the dump is a more regular shape in the split ones than it is in a bellmouth, so even though the bellomouth style is simply bigger, thus giving a bigger volume for the turbine exit gases to spew into when the wastegate is still closed and theoretically giving a better spool response, I think the smaller turbine pipe doesn't hurt the split ones at all.

Oh, and the 1 piece ones do not take any extra effort to fit.

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394003-frontdump-pipe/#findComment-6265236
Share on other sites

It is my considered opinion that keeping the wastegate gases from messing up the turbine exit gases in the most critical region (ie, immediately after the turbine outlet) is very worthwhile. The ideal turbine outlet is a nice smooth conical expansion from the outlet size up to some big size (like 3"), but of course no one has the room to do it like that. For a start, they usually have to bend straight away. Given this, I can;t see why you'd be happy to make the turbine exit development region any worse by spraying wastegate flow directly across it. Seems daft.

The little short split wastegate dumps are probably a waste of time. They poke the wastegate gases back in pretty close to the top. Seems silly just to make them a simple replacement for the factory dump. I got one of the cheap JJR long split ones (dump and front pipe in one) and it noticeably improved the spool response of the car. Absolutely no clearance problems with the flap valve. I didn't test it against a bellmouth, so I can't say for sure that it is better than a bellmouth, but I can't see how it would be worse. Any time a Skyline is making power, the wastegate is open. So spraying wastegate gases in cannot be a good thing for peak power. The turbine exit part of the dump is a more regular shape in the split ones than it is in a bellmouth, so even though the bellomouth style is simply bigger, thus giving a bigger volume for the turbine exit gases to spew into when the wastegate is still closed and theoretically giving a better spool response, I think the smaller turbine pipe doesn't hurt the split ones at all.

Oh, and the 1 piece ones do not take any extra effort to fit.

pretty much my assumption too, but with the small amount of extra power im looking at either or prob wont be a big difference.

thanks for clarifying the fitment question so fast :thumbsup:

and thanks everyone for your quick replies

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394003-frontdump-pipe/#findComment-6265253
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...