Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh offset looks weak, red on the rims looks like ass, boot lip looks different colour. also is the bonnet carbon? would of looked better if it was all one colour.

i would have gone bronze te37 or lmgt4s, te37sl may have also looked ok with much better offsets

more of that light blue R32 over on the left if you have them, im a big fan of that shade of blue, probably something to do with the orange/blue combination seen on the GT40 now and then..dont think the black bonnet and red front grill works very well with it though.

My two fave SAU lines are the white 34 of GTRSeans and the black nur of another long time member whos name escapes me right now..so tuff though!

Marko, i got all those shots from those awesomepowered.com people, the facebook page, there are plenty of other good groups out there with similar eye candy and you have inspired me to do another copy pasta run!

this time from 7tune..

543475_361028837267892_185851534785624_931112_432055953_n.jpg

472957_361250690579040_185851534785624_931343_900349373_o.jpg

474753_362078390496270_185851534785624_932507_1116900022_o.jpg

r34 rims on an R32?

410847_364988433538599_185851534785624_937320_33158079_o.jpg

523975_368654439838665_185851534785624_947819_1164714140_n.jpg

528819_369274543109988_185851534785624_948563_692358130_n.jpg

578553_369303806440395_185851534785624_948582_1859072344_n.jpg

I cant choose. Love them all equally for different reasons. 32 looks track weapon, 33 looks fat which i think looks tough as and 34 looks like one bad ass mother fire trucker. 35...... meh. i liked them more until i saw how big they were in person. not for me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...