Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R34 GTR V-spec, lightly modified 260kw@wheels priced to sell, cheapest V-spec around, with a few tasteful mods

- Factory wheels paint charcol

- HKS coilovers

- HKS air filters

- Spit fire coil packs

- Apexi power FC with hand controller

- Apexi elec boost controller

- OS Giken race twin plate clutch put in about 2000kms ago

- Jasma front pipes into 3' hi-flow cat into 3 1/2' rear pipe

- Autometer boost gauge

- Nismo 320km/h dash

- TV/DVD player

- Viper alarm with pager

Car has been tuned on 14-15psi making 260kw@rw

Great weekender, amazing car to drive, first to see will buy

Car is located in Mill Park

Any questions just call Billy 0404 00 66 00

$45000 ono MUST SELL money going back into business

Very regretful sale

post-92876-0-72346400-1335073560_thumb.jpg

post-92876-0-19151300-1335073571_thumb.jpg

post-92876-0-47707200-1335073580_thumb.jpg

post-92876-0-27836100-1335073589_thumb.jpg

post-92876-0-03351900-1335073600_thumb.jpg

post-92876-0-14112400-1335073609_thumb.jpg

post-92876-0-50889400-1335073618_thumb.jpg

Edited by GXE747
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Quite reasonably priced I have to say - tight market.

Jap History with Logs? > Kms?

Are you the first Aust owner?

Service history here?

Can't help but feel that there's some other modification other than exhaust, hi flow cat and that psi to put out 260. Mostly, that setup would show about 230.

GLWS :)

Quite reasonably priced I have to say - tight market.

Jap History with Logs? > Kms?

Are you the first Aust owner?

Service history here?

Can't help but feel that there's some other modification other than exhaust, hi flow cat and that psi to put out 260. Mostly, that setup would show about 230.

GLWS :)

I recal seeing my friends dyno sheet for his R34 GTR reading out 253awkw with nothing more than a full exhaust and boost (ableit 17psi on ceramics lol). Still standard injectors, fuel pump, ecu, the works - same said car ran a 12.2 down the creek!

GL with the same mate, car looks very nice!

Thanx guys..

Terry_GT-R34 - thats all the car has. I took it to calder park and had 1 pass and ran 12.0 @ 115mph

I rekon better tyres, adjustment on the suspention and a better take off no probz a 11.8-11.7

A mate went 11.9@114 with just an exhaust, boost restrictor taken out and a twin plate with his r32 gtr

I am the second owner in Oz, car has 71,000kms, all factory books stamped and even the factory spare key still stapled in owners manual

As for service history here, my mate used to own PET modifications. He maintaines the car now out off a private garage

Any further questions please call Billy on 0404 00 66 00

Cheers

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Thanx guys..

Terry_GT-R34 - thats all the car has. I took it to calder park and had 1 pass and ran 12.0 @ 115mph

I rekon better tyres, adjustment on the suspention and a better take off no probz a 11.8-11.7

A mate went 11.9@114 with just an exhaust, boost restrictor taken out and a twin plate with his r32 gtr

Cheers

dont believe ya

or i should be runnin 11.5 with -7s

Edited by w34ponGT

Thanx guys..

Terry_GT-R34 - thats all the car has. I took it to calder park and had 1 pass and ran 12.0 @ 115mph

I rekon better tyres, adjustment on the suspention and a better take off no probz a 11.8-11.7

A mate went 11.9@114 with just an exhaust, boost restrictor taken out and a twin plate with his r32 gtr

I am the second owner in Oz, car has 71,000kms, all factory books stamped and even the factory spare key still stapled in owners manual

As for service history here, my mate used to own PET modifications. He maintaines the car now out off a private garage

Any further questions please call Billy on 0404 00 66 00

Cheers

I would believe a 260awkw 34 gtr run 12 flat. But R32 gtr with exhaust and no restrictor which means running 14-15psi doing high 11s is really hard to believe.

w34ponGT - According to the power your "claiming to have" your very far off the money champ

You say ur cars got 315rwkw but you could only get a 12.1 @ 118, so either ur car doesnt have that power or your not driving the car hard enough

  • 2 weeks later...

I would believe a 260awkw 34 gtr run 12 flat. But R32 gtr with exhaust and no restrictor which means running 14-15psi doing high 11s is really hard to believe.

What about a stock engine Gtr, cat back, 12psi running 12.18?

Why do people feel the need to ridicule someone who is trying to sell their car by posting rubbish in their threads,

If you really wanna see proof ask XKLABA, ran 11.3 with 290rwkw on stock turbos

So disappear and let the bloke sell his car

GLWS mate

Why do people feel the need to ridicule someone who is trying to sell their car by posting rubbish in their threads,

If you really wanna see proof ask XKLABA, ran 11.3 with 290rwkw on stock turbos

So disappear and let the bloke sell his car

GLWS mate

+1

Awsome car.

Free bump

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...