Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure if this is the right section, but does anyone know which is the better insurer

I got quotes off NRMA (whose "market value" was half of what rebook is and more than half of what I am paying) so they are out

Just Car valuing it at purchase price and will cost $1,894 and covers mods

Lumleys insurance at purchase price as well for $903 and covers mods

Just wondering if there is something Im missing for Lumleys. I guess it seems too good to be true so I want to make sure there isn't a reason to avoid Lumleys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/
Share on other sites

I think Lumleys excess was 600 and just car was 800. but i dont really look at excess much, Im more interested in things they cover and dont cover, but I asked a few questions of the chick at Lumleys and everything seemed covered

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6332471
Share on other sites

Lumleys SV and Shannon's give you a choice of repairer. Whereas Just Car will only give you a choice if it's the cheapest quote.

Lumleys is chasing market share at the moment, so quite a few people are making hay while the sun shines.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6332475
Share on other sites

On their PDS, Lumleys SV will also cover any window breakage (eg rear quarter/side/rear) without penalty, whereas Just Car will only cover the front windscreen. Mouldings are extra tho'

PDS tells all and Shannon's is pretty good too BTW.

Just Car is often the only insurance company accessible to younger drivers. I wish there was more competition out there to reduce their premiums - sigh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6332870
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

By this do you mean for example car is totalled and you have illegal coilovers they won't cover the coilovers but will the rest of the car or they outright simply won't payout anything at all. Also what is your source?

I'd like to know this as well. But from logic and a fairness point of view, I'd imagine they wouldn't cover you IF the illegal part was the cause or a contribution of the accident, which I think is somewhat fair.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398713-r34-insurance/#findComment-6620520
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...