Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I have really strange problem on my car, was searching for answers through Google but found only questions.

Here is the deal:

I bought R34 with RB20DE and manual gear box,

engine was swapped with RB25DET from R33 series one

wiring i didnot change coz i had no wiring loom from r33 with ABS so i decide to adapt R34 wiring to R33 engine, was needed some adaptation especially with cas and few more sensors

ecu is used from R34 gtt with nistune board inside

Car has the problem, during the acceleration with load it has fuel or load cut at 3000-4000 rpm, cut mostly looks like RPM limit

Dont know where to find problem, change everything few sensors maf even fuel pump, took the car on dyno to measure boost and its standard, i mean car cuts at 5 psi of boost, boost leaks, spark plugs, gap and timing, all this procedure i have done but no success

Maybe anyone had similar problem during the swapping rb?

only thing i have left is change cas, they are different type on r34 and r33 s1, that will be hard and easiest is to change wiring to r33 and run on Z32 ECU, but am not sure that this can help, found over the net same problems and nobody writes how they fix the problem or what was the reason

Ah and yes cuts at different rpm depending how the ignition is set

thanks in advanced and looking for some help

If you are running more than standard boost then it is possible that you are bumping up against a funny problem caused by not having ABS/TCS stuff installed. What the Nistune guys have worked out is that when the R34 ECu does no see the TCS equipment, it causes a strange cut, exactly as you describe. Not at stock boost levels, but definitely happens once you wind it up a bit.

They have tried changing to Stagea bin files to get around the problem, because Stageas do not have TCS, and that solves the problem. But it is not a good solution, because Stageas are all auto, and the auto images do not run a manual car very well. I have tried it. Even after changing every map and switch in the Stagea auto image to be the same as the manual R34 image, my car had drivability issues. The trouble is that Nistune only gives you access to about 1/3 of all the stuff inside the ECU, and we simply do not know what the majority of the rest of it does. There must be differences between the autos and manuals hiding inside the dark matter part of the ECU that you can't change.

My suggested solution is to go into the DTC flags section of Nistune, I think what you want is in DTC Flags 1 and DTC Flags 4, and switch off the TCS flags. There are 3 of them. I do not know if this will actually solve your problem, because it is really just masking the fault code, not fixing the problem, but it is worth a try.

If that fails, you could always try getting the ECU reprogrammed with the Stagea image and see if you can live with the little drivability problems.

I already change maf to Z32 and fuel pump is 044, as i mentioned boost is the standard and dyno showed somewhere 5 psi at the moment of cutting

DTC flags i already play with :) i think disable or enable them is only giving that errors not comes up and that is all

Really strange thing is that car runs at really lean unless i dont play with Constant , it should not be! after changing the Maf constant goes from 3xx to 560 and that value is terrible lean unless i dont go to 640 to make at idle close to 14.1 -5

Also as soon i will go from neutral to any gear car goes to knock Map

what about cas? if its wired right should it have this issue anyway ? maybe the signal is different voltage ?

On S1 is mitsubishi cas system and on later one is Hitachi, i have checked cas discos and there is almost no difference, anyway some guys have succeed same swaps with no issue, but looking at google i found threads where people got this issue on stock car but couldn't find reason

Edited by guricha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...