Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmm I was sure I'd seen people plumb catch cans back into the sump, maybe it was after an oil air seperator.

Oil is just shell helix HX7 10-40, might be too thin?

That's not going to account for air in the sump, would a blocked pcv cause that though?

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes it would be the catch can plumbed back to the sump with a breather on top, maybe try 10-60 or 15-60, a blocked or broken PCV might be the cause especially on turbo cars, at least its easy to check it!

Edited by 51NNA

OK more info on this.

Replaced the leak down % gauge with a regular 0-150psi gauge.

Dialled in 20-40-60-80 and 100 psi inputs and no matter what input I put in, when connecting up to the spark plug hose BOTH gauges would always drop 5psi, as per usual the air can be felt leaving the dipstick.

This doesn't make sense to me, 5psi of 20 is a huge 25% drop but 5psi of 100 is obviously only 5%. Further to that, both gauges dropped down by the same amount, I'd have thought that the input pressure gauge should stay at the set pressure but how can that ever work if both gauges on the spark plug side of the regulator.

Of course the gauge is going to drop in pressure when connected as you've just opened up a larger volume of space for it to pressurise. Should both gauges be dropping like that?

Just buy a compression tester, rip all the plugs out first, start at 1 and work you're way back, crank it over 3 or 4 times and write down the results. Should be around 140-160 if a cyl is leaking it will show.

i bought a few of the leak down testers off ebay and they all were faulty.... 3 in fact. It turns out they were calibrated for "small engines" and the seller in china just thought removing the sticker would make it suitable for your average motor car..

bought one locally from snap on and it works perfectly.

Status I was thinking the same thing, low input pressures to set it implied it was for small engines, but I've replaced the leak down % gauge with another -150psi gauge so calibration is not an issue now.

A mechanic on another forum is telling me that on a good engine there should not be really notable air flow into the crankcase so that's enough info regardless of what the gauges say.

I'll have some more good data hopefully this evening when I can leak down test another mates rebuilt CA which makes good power so we know it's tight enough.

From there I can make a call, and it may just be turn down the boost a touch, run thicker oil and modify the catch setup to keep driving it.

As for the catch setup it's a standard exhaust cam into catch, catch into intake setup, no venting. (I have baffled it so it actually catches the oil...)

If I modify it I'll delete the PCV, pipe the intake into the catch also, plumb a drain into the catch back to the sump and vent the catch to atmo so the engine can breath back through it as needed.

I'm also considering one of these little guys to help sealing.

http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydisplay.asp?catcode=13023

OK more info.

Had my mate come over, and to correct a mistake I made earlier his SR only has fresh bearings, rings are 106ks.

We leak down tested his and then switched the second gauge on the tester and pumped 80psi into a cylinder, his came back with the same results mine had, about 20% on the leak down and notable air escaping from the dipstick/oil filler hole. Though I noticed his took a few seconds of pressuring at 80psi before the air escaping the dipstick etc was noticeable.

We warmed mine up and tested it again, same results as his. So I can only conclude that there is not enough solid data to pull it down.

On the catch can front, I've had an idea. As my can has an input into it from the exhaust side rocker and exits out into the intake like the factory setup, I'm wondering if the reason it's filling so quick is that the GT2560 on 17-18psi is generating enough vacuum in the intake pipe (where the catch can feeds back into) to draw more oil heavy vapours out of the rocker cover than it would with a factory turbo on stock boost.

I will test this by blocking that feed back into the intake and throwing it on the dyno with an empty catch.

^^ just had a thought... did you remove the big black baffle box that connects the crankcase to the rocker cover vent? if so put it back.

To be honest, I'm not sure what that is or where it would be on a CA, I don't recall seeing anything matching that description. The factory breather setup on a CA just goes from the exhaust rocker to the intake pipe in front of the turbo. Mine now has a baffled catch can between those points.

The water is probably leaking externally somewhere. CAs are notorious for headgasket water leaks.

I've had a solid look but that's not to say it isn't weeping onto the exhaust manifold and burning off or leaking down the back of the engine where it's impossible to see.

I had an oil leak at the back of the engine from the half moon seal and that's been fixed now so hopefully if it's leaking down the back I'll see it.

Any thoughts on my oil comments? turbo creating vacuum in the catch?

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok update time and good news.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

I disconnected the pipe from the catch to the intake pipe and went for a blast after emptying the catch. Came back with a clean catch this time.

So I'll get a filter for the exit of the catch can and block the intake port. Job done :D

If it is using it, then of course it wont.

I'll be watching it very closely to see if the level is dropping and requiring top up.

I'll also lay something down underneath it to make it easier to spot leaks.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

If that's the case, then maybe a there's a few kws to be had by improving the intake/filter. If the compressor sees a vacuum then it has to overcome that to get back to atmospheric pressure before it can make boost, so there'll be more heat in the compressed air and spool will be slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...