Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmm I was sure I'd seen people plumb catch cans back into the sump, maybe it was after an oil air seperator.

Oil is just shell helix HX7 10-40, might be too thin?

That's not going to account for air in the sump, would a blocked pcv cause that though?

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes it would be the catch can plumbed back to the sump with a breather on top, maybe try 10-60 or 15-60, a blocked or broken PCV might be the cause especially on turbo cars, at least its easy to check it!

Edited by 51NNA

OK more info on this.

Replaced the leak down % gauge with a regular 0-150psi gauge.

Dialled in 20-40-60-80 and 100 psi inputs and no matter what input I put in, when connecting up to the spark plug hose BOTH gauges would always drop 5psi, as per usual the air can be felt leaving the dipstick.

This doesn't make sense to me, 5psi of 20 is a huge 25% drop but 5psi of 100 is obviously only 5%. Further to that, both gauges dropped down by the same amount, I'd have thought that the input pressure gauge should stay at the set pressure but how can that ever work if both gauges on the spark plug side of the regulator.

Of course the gauge is going to drop in pressure when connected as you've just opened up a larger volume of space for it to pressurise. Should both gauges be dropping like that?

Just buy a compression tester, rip all the plugs out first, start at 1 and work you're way back, crank it over 3 or 4 times and write down the results. Should be around 140-160 if a cyl is leaking it will show.

i bought a few of the leak down testers off ebay and they all were faulty.... 3 in fact. It turns out they were calibrated for "small engines" and the seller in china just thought removing the sticker would make it suitable for your average motor car..

bought one locally from snap on and it works perfectly.

Status I was thinking the same thing, low input pressures to set it implied it was for small engines, but I've replaced the leak down % gauge with another -150psi gauge so calibration is not an issue now.

A mechanic on another forum is telling me that on a good engine there should not be really notable air flow into the crankcase so that's enough info regardless of what the gauges say.

I'll have some more good data hopefully this evening when I can leak down test another mates rebuilt CA which makes good power so we know it's tight enough.

From there I can make a call, and it may just be turn down the boost a touch, run thicker oil and modify the catch setup to keep driving it.

As for the catch setup it's a standard exhaust cam into catch, catch into intake setup, no venting. (I have baffled it so it actually catches the oil...)

If I modify it I'll delete the PCV, pipe the intake into the catch also, plumb a drain into the catch back to the sump and vent the catch to atmo so the engine can breath back through it as needed.

I'm also considering one of these little guys to help sealing.

http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydisplay.asp?catcode=13023

OK more info.

Had my mate come over, and to correct a mistake I made earlier his SR only has fresh bearings, rings are 106ks.

We leak down tested his and then switched the second gauge on the tester and pumped 80psi into a cylinder, his came back with the same results mine had, about 20% on the leak down and notable air escaping from the dipstick/oil filler hole. Though I noticed his took a few seconds of pressuring at 80psi before the air escaping the dipstick etc was noticeable.

We warmed mine up and tested it again, same results as his. So I can only conclude that there is not enough solid data to pull it down.

On the catch can front, I've had an idea. As my can has an input into it from the exhaust side rocker and exits out into the intake like the factory setup, I'm wondering if the reason it's filling so quick is that the GT2560 on 17-18psi is generating enough vacuum in the intake pipe (where the catch can feeds back into) to draw more oil heavy vapours out of the rocker cover than it would with a factory turbo on stock boost.

I will test this by blocking that feed back into the intake and throwing it on the dyno with an empty catch.

^^ just had a thought... did you remove the big black baffle box that connects the crankcase to the rocker cover vent? if so put it back.

To be honest, I'm not sure what that is or where it would be on a CA, I don't recall seeing anything matching that description. The factory breather setup on a CA just goes from the exhaust rocker to the intake pipe in front of the turbo. Mine now has a baffled catch can between those points.

The water is probably leaking externally somewhere. CAs are notorious for headgasket water leaks.

I've had a solid look but that's not to say it isn't weeping onto the exhaust manifold and burning off or leaking down the back of the engine where it's impossible to see.

I had an oil leak at the back of the engine from the half moon seal and that's been fixed now so hopefully if it's leaking down the back I'll see it.

Any thoughts on my oil comments? turbo creating vacuum in the catch?

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok update time and good news.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

I disconnected the pipe from the catch to the intake pipe and went for a blast after emptying the catch. Came back with a clean catch this time.

So I'll get a filter for the exit of the catch can and block the intake port. Job done :D

If it is using it, then of course it wont.

I'll be watching it very closely to see if the level is dropping and requiring top up.

I'll also lay something down underneath it to make it easier to spot leaks.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

If that's the case, then maybe a there's a few kws to be had by improving the intake/filter. If the compressor sees a vacuum then it has to overcome that to get back to atmospheric pressure before it can make boost, so there'll be more heat in the compressed air and spool will be slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
    • I can donate $100 to your upgrade fund. So long as you can donate the IC7 my way....
    • I'd love a Haltech ECU, and Haltech 10 dash. Was having a chat with Rob and Andy @ Haltech when Rob put one in his MR2. First one I'm kind of interested in too, as you can dim it RIGHT down. Andy was saying bright dashes is one of his peeves too!
×
×
  • Create New...