Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, so I'm about to throw on some cam gears so I began step one - check base timing so when I put it all back together I can set it correctly. Hooked up the timing light and something doesn't look right... Looks like its at around 27deg? (Should be 20)

2012_06_16_0953_web.jpg

Is this likely? Car runs ok (except is running out of injector hence the current work ready for new injectors and a trip to the tuner)

Is it possible that the harmonic balancer could be indicating the wrong timing?

My power FC shows 20deg at idle and advances as I increase the revs; should the base timing there match the timing shown on the harmonic balancer?

2012_06_16_0957_web.jpg

The CAS appears to be in about the right spot, not even sure what the range of adjustment is, but it appears roughly in the middle...

2012_06_16_0958_web.jpg

Engine manual guide for those playing at home...

2012_06_16_0959_web.jpg

Any ideas? Do I need to put the dial caliper down the spark plug hole to double check TDC/timing?

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/402700-rb26-base-timing-a-little-help/
Share on other sites

The 20 degree figure you see is the ECU assuming the base timing is 20degrees, it has no way of knowing mechanically what the timing is set to.

If it's a cheap timing light you may actually be seeing double taking the reading from the wire loop, confirm with coil #1.

The 20 degree figure you see is the ECU assuming the base timing is 20degrees, it has no way of knowing mechanically what the timing is set to.

If it's a cheap timing light you may actually be seeing double taking the reading from the wire loop, confirm with coil #1.

Cool, that's what I thought - mechanical/electronic base timing is independent.

I used the blue loop at the back of the engine; I'll have to test it again using coil #1 I guess. I figured if it was the wrong coil/signal it would be ~60 degrees out though meaning it would either be right or way wrong. Is this the wrong assumption?

Definately use coil 1, heaps more accurate reading, dont know if u csn lock the timing on a power fc, but if u can u should do that when setting ur timing

Locking the timing isnt really required, just be sure to match ur base timing with what ever the ecu is outputting at idle at the time of setting

+1 for high tension lead between plug and coilpack

nah just zip tie the mouth of the timing light open and hold it against the front of No1 coil, works fine, as Jez said the "timing loop" can show upto a 15deg change in actual timing

I know if I check the timing on my two GTRs before they are full temp they can read up to 27deg adv at idle, depending on how cold they are, so full op temp before you check it

having said that if the car was/has been tuned like it is then put it back how you found it and ask the tuner next time its tuned

^^ good advice. Just as a follow up, I did check it off no.1 coil and found no difference, but I'm in the process of fitting cam gears and new injectors so it will need a tune once done. Will put it back as it was and get the tuner to check it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...