Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'd be getting rid of the dumps, cause I had the same dumps and the same issue. Since changed over to Midori dumps (but changed to -5s as well)

Oh I see....well that's the thing - I've been reading about peeps who swear by them and then others who're fans of the bell mouth style ones which are what you're using (I think).

So did you have a set of -9's before you went to the -5's? Keen to hear more about these xforce dumps and why they're not that good...I'd be happy to swap them over or even put my stock R33 GTR ones back on (I know people make decent figures on these too and also use them as upgrades on the R32's)

I use xforce split dumps - they're fine. 305kw @ 17psi on -7s. 16psi at 4000rpm. If anything you could go slightly backwards spool wise with a bellmouth as they produce more turbulence post turbine. Changing dumps is turbo out, so not only will it not help, it will be expensive for labour....

Ah ok - that's the divided opinions right there haha

Ah the swap isn't too bad - I've gotten it down to about 1 day's solid work now but don't really want to do it again! Those are some nice figures by the way - you must have an excellent tune! Yeh at this stage I'm just going to drop the cat and cat-back out to see if there's any difference. If there is, it's new cat and new tune time ;-)

I have -9s with HPI bellmouth dumps one of the biggest on sale. Running 330awkw 18psi full boost 3800rpm.

I don't think your dumps are the main issue, yes could improve with different ones, but as stated before drop the cat and check/replace it.

I had an issue with a previous "hi flow" cat that was causing a 10+psi restriction

I have -9s with HPI bellmouth dumps one of the biggest on sale. Running 330awkw 18psi full boost 3800rpm.

I don't think your dumps are the main issue, yes could improve with different ones, but as stated before drop the cat and check/replace it.

I had an issue with a previous "hi flow" cat that was causing a 10+psi restriction

Wow those are even more awesome figures! Ok, well tomorrow I'll drop the exhaust and see what she's like and post it up on here. Yeh 10psi+ seems like a massive restriction - I'd probably have something like this too.

But yes, we shall find out tomorrow.

Thanks for all your replies so far - most helpful in a time of great frustration!

i have 18psi by 3800rpm on hks dumps so problems for you there, also had an issue with blocked cat previously and car lost 40kw, check for leaks as well

I'm assuming you mean "no" problems there...are you referring to the split dumps? 40kw hey? Yeh I need to gain at least that much....really hoping to make close to 300kw to make all the money spent worth while!

Also guessing you already know but don't flog the shit out of it with the cat dropped.

It's not going to be tuned for the extra flow and power so might lean out at some points

Haha offcourse not. I've been talking to the tuner about this...about how much margin there would be for this. I basically plan on just giving it a gentle tap because I'll know right away if it's had an effect - that's how poor it's performance is right now. Then I'll be booking it in with the local exhaust mob to get a proper hi flowing cat put in place, along with a larger internal dia canon

Yeh tuner didn't know much about my turbos...didn't even know -9's existed in the 2860 range :P Mainly does bigger turbos and singles.

She's obviously gonna need a re-tune once exhaust has been rectified (provided that's the only problem and it's not something more sinister etc etc)

just curious, if the tuner dropped the exhaust on the dyno how would the gases get collected, from what i seen the fans or whatever that suck them up and deal with them are right at the back of the dyno room, so wouldnt that fill the room up with fumes???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...