Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nope, meant cam gears

Ah ok that's what I thought ;) Well I'm definitely going to have to see your results with the gears. I'm not going to touch mine for a while as I need to put in a new front diff first before I can go anywhere near a dyno. It is currently Australias only RWD R33 GTR :)

back in '07 lol

Lol yes that's true but I have read thru it all and it's about GT-SS's which from what I've read are near identical to -9's.

It's funny though...there are many claims across all these forums of what the -9's / GT-SS turbos perform like.

Claims of where full boost of around 20 pounds is reached vary from 3800 to 5700 with the average, especially on my thread, being around 4500rpm (the later sounding quite reasonable) Then there're those who claim that they are more responsive than ceramics, while others claim they're similar to, followed by those who say they're far more laggier and should be avoided. Then, for all these claims we have various dyno plots for cars with similar hardware where one could swear they're all running different turbos haha....that's how varied these -9 results are.

Offcourse, all engines are different....not to mention the skills of the tuners that work with them. I guess I'm just trying to say that it's quite hard to get a proper feel for what these turbos "could" be like.

Here's the difference of standard turbos to -7s on my car. Very few data points but its still instructive. Yes the ceramics spool faster. If you only cared about response, getting steel wheels on the stockers would probably be a good option. Seat of the pants dyno reckoned that clipped turbine high flows i had spooled more like stockers and -7s.

gallery_15274_3730_6060.png

Lol yes that's true but I have read thru it all and it's about GT-SS's which from what I've read are near identical to -9's.

It's funny though...there are many claims across all these forums of what the -9's / GT-SS turbos perform like.

Claims of where full boost of around 20 pounds is reached vary from 3800 to 5700 with the average, especially on my thread, being around 4500rpm (the later sounding quite reasonable) Then there're those who claim that they are more responsive than ceramics, while others claim they're similar to, followed by those who say they're far more laggier and should be avoided. Then, for all these claims we have various dyno plots for cars with similar hardware where one could swear they're all running different turbos haha....that's how varied these -9 results are.

Offcourse, all engines are different....not to mention the skills of the tuners that work with them. I guess I'm just trying to say that it's quite hard to get a proper feel for what these turbos "could" be like.

I agree there is such mixed opinion, as most of you know i could not decide between -9 and -5 for months. Let alone knowing how my -9s are going to actaully perform when complete.

I Read every dyno sheet for both, Even called a handfull of tuners and spoke to them first hand. And that confussed things even more with them saying they could get -5's on just a quick as the -9s and have much more room for top end later.

But yer as much as results vary its to hard to compare them agaist something becasue nothing is standard and everoynes build/Tuner is diffrent.

as long as your happy with your results then i dont see a point in stressing about it. Though if your way below the acg like you are, Then theres a reason for that which more then likey can be fixed.

I agree there is such mixed opinion, as most of you know i could not decide between -9 and -5 for months. Let alone knowing how my -9s are going to actaully perform when complete.

I Read every dyno sheet for both, Even called a handfull of tuners and spoke to them first hand. And that confussed things even more with them saying they could get -5's on just a quick as the -9s and have much more room for top end later.

But yer as much as results vary its to hard to compare them agaist something becasue nothing is standard and everoynes build/Tuner is diffrent.

as long as your happy with your results then i dont see a point in stressing about it. Though if your way below the acg like you are, Then theres a reason for that which more then likey can be fixed.

Yep that's pretty much how it is. And then there's also those tuners out there who whisper sweet little things in your ear about that they can make anything come on lightning quick and then stop talking to you as soon as you handed over your dough :no: Some of these places have no shame or pride in what they do - simply in it for the money and just give you lip service till they get it.

One more thing you can throw into the mix is hybrid versions of these turbos - like, in my travels I came across a set of 2530's with bigger compressor wheels and competition split dumps for the price of new -9's. They probably would have been good but you gotta always ask yourself why they were selling them for if they were so "fantastic" etc.

Here's the difference of standard turbos to -7s on my car. Very few data points but its still instructive. Yes the ceramics spool faster. If you only cared about response, getting steel wheels on the stockers would probably be a good option. Seat of the pants dyno reckoned that clipped turbine high flows i had spooled more like stockers and -7s.

Yeh well I was looking at those steel wheel kits you can buy before the -7's caught my fancy. A set of steel wheeled stockers with some extra preload on them and EBC would be mental through a mountain pass!! Anyone who's still running ceramics should realy throw on some adjustable actuators and brace themselves :P

Yeh mate, I think in the 7 years I've had these cars with all sorts of turbo combos I think I'm more of a response man. The lag is all cool when you want to impress your mates but at all other times I personally just find it a pain in the ass. Big singles with their light switch on/off delivery are much more fun for that anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeh well I was looking at those steel wheel kits you can buy before the -7's caught my fancy. A set of steel wheeled stockers with some extra preload on them and EBC would be mental through a mountain pass!! Anyone who's still running ceramics should realy throw on some adjustable actuators and brace themselves :PFor a explosion

Yes true true :)

However, not that I recommend this....but.....I was running my ceramics at a minimum of 15 pounds for 4 years and last year I ran them up to 18 pounds for shits and giggles. I studied up on the causes of the "explosion" and made sure I didn't do what is the biggest contributor to it, ie, shutting off the turbos while they're literally red hot (the theory of the ceramic wheel shrinking faster than the metal shaft thus micro-fracturing the turbine wheel's hub over and extended period of time)

They've also been thru numerous track and dyno days (and that is racing, not putter around happy laps style)

Right now they're sitting on my shelf and they have no play in either axis....and spin as good as any journal bearing type turbo. Offcourse, it could also be that I have a very well manufactured, faultless set of turbine wheels....ceramic's manufacture process was definitely not a reliable / consistent one 17 years ago.

It would be interesting to find out exactly how many of these units have failed and under what circumstances...and, what led up to it.

Hmm not sure right now - may have to check but, it would still support the theory as the shaft, being the shape it is will cool down a lot slower than the exhaust wheel vanes with their massive surface area. It was a pretty good write up...and would explain why they can shatter at as little as "8 pounds worth" of RPMs (whatever that equates too).

But either way. As far as the topic goes....I'm still sitting here with lag monsters haha - need to get at least the rear diff sorted so I can do a proper dyno run without lighting up on the less loaded side GRRRRRRR!! Not happy Jan....not happy at all about all this. :verymad:

It would be an advantage if the shaft was ceramic (I'm not sure, I've never taken one apart), as it wouldn't transfer heat from the exhaust wheel to the compressor where a metal shaft would.

I was under the impression that heat and high rpm was the killer

Yep and age, and its pretty much always the rear that goes. I'm guessing that's either to due to the plenum pushing a bit more air into #6, or the PCV venting to the rear turbo, or both.

My ceramic turbine broke off flush with the housing, so yeah its all ceramic.

Yep and age, and its pretty much always the rear that goes. I'm guessing that's either to due to the plenum pushing a bit more air into #6, or the PCV venting to the rear turbo, or both.

My ceramic turbine broke off flush with the housing, so yeah its all ceramic.

Did it go to the cat or get sucked back in?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...