Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1) ive put a walboro 400lph pump into a mates r32 gtr, was piss easy

2) nismo is direct fit into hoses and airbox(same physical size as stock units) Z32 is larger size (80mm) will need to modify air box or use pods, pipes can be stretched to make these fit

1) I put the Walbro in my 32, was a simple process and basically a bolt in, you just have to run a wire from battery ( I went from the alternator ) to the plug in the top of the tank, the walbro needs more voltage to work it best

2) As SiR_RB said, which is why I suggested the Apex'i kit, they have one that adapts to the Z32s and is what I have on the 32 and made a massive difference over the HKS pods I took off ( they where modified to suit the 80mm Z32s )

The setup on my 34 was a really good street combo, PFC, 600cc injectors with nismo FPR and nismo pump, -7s ( though after seeing Seans 34 with -9s I say go the -9s ), full exhuast ( though since you have a 33 just do from the dumps back, 80mm cat and 3.5 inch back ) cam gears set for response ( I had poncams but not necessary ) I had stock AFMs with the stock airbox, if you where going to put a stock airbox then I would say Nismo AFMs but if your happy with pods then get the Apex'i kit and the 80mm AFMs, with that it made 310+rwkw on 19-20psi

-9's are slightly more expensive because they don't come with actuators, but you would probably want to put adjustable actuators on them anyway. -7's do come with non-adjustable actuators but they are 14.7psi (1 bar) actuators from memory.

So i take it i need these,

http://www.kudosmoto...dett-p-835.html

+ some adjustable actuators

Random thought; Will the stock gearbox/diff's be able to take the extra power?

Edited by Booki

The GCG adjustable actuators are so much cheaper than HKS adjustables: http://www.gcg.com.au/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=556&category_id=39&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=101

You can re-use the factory actuators but they will cause all types of problems around 18psi because of the weak springs.

Random thought; Will the stock gearbox/diff's be able to take the extra power?

Yes. Just have a little mechanical sympathy... IE DONT be a complete and utter moron with it and they will be fine.

Z32 and Nismo AFM's are not truly identical. There is ever so slight difference in the resolution/mapping of the AFM voltage.

Its minimal and hence for all intents and purposes they are "the same". Go Nismo however - cannot beat bolt in replacement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...