Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All

was at a Skylinesdownunder Dyno day here in Auckland this weekend and thought I'd throw the car on the dyno just to see what it was made of. After 3 runs the most the tuner was able to get out of it was 83.5KW which I was shocked at.

So a bit about the car

2001 V35 Skyline 300GT

VQ30DD Engine

5 SPD Auto

170k on the clock

Running 95 Octane (Its my daily and lives in traffic)

Has an O2 sensor issue but we cleared the ECU first.

The tuner said Run 98, new intake, full exhaust and a Trans Flush I might break 110kw

The engine standard is 185kw (at the fly) I'm just trying to find out where my other 100kw ran off to

Any ideas?

Dyno Sheet

389024_10151904197005214_1116238319_n.jpg

Lol. Forget it. Doesn't even look like a good representation of an engines power band.

My guess is that the thing was set up really wrong for your car, or something else weird. If you can be stuffed, go and get another power run and get them to set it up right. It's not the power figure thats all that wrong, but the rpms look sus too, max power at 4400 rpm? Don't think so.

I would expect 110-120rwkw from a healthy motor on a normal dyno.

yeah it looked weird to me too.

I'll be doing a few things to the car before I put it back on the dyno but if thats actually what my engine is currently putting out I'd be wondering where all my horses went

has anyone on here with a 300GT been on a dyno?

The flywheel power does not equal what a dyno will read. Ok?

The reason for this is that only part of the power makes it through the whole drivetrain, other power is used up turning the auto gearbox, turning the diff, wheel bearings, and lost in friction between the rollers and your tyres.

Therefore, use a dyno as a comparative tool. Once you do mods, you can see an improvement or loss. If you put the car on 5 different dynos, you'll most likely get 5 different figures.

Oh I totally understand that a dyno will never read flywheel power due to the loss of power through the drivetrain.

Its just the amount of loss was unexpected possibly due to a trans issue or the idea the the hub dyno was set up incorrectly.

The dyno sheet itself seems to read strangely as well but that could just be me.

I'll redo the dyno after I have done the recommended changes by the tuner and see what comes of it

A guy on SDU mentioned it could be a case of the timing chain actually stretching and that this was a common fault on the VQ25DD and the VQ30DD. Has anyone here had that issue?

What gear was it done in? if it was 4th then you'd be in the speed limiter I think. Should be done in 3rd so you can use all the rev range. Hub dyno = less loss = higher figure than a roller.

If your going down the path of mods, there is no point on the basis of this dyno graph. Get it done properly, by someone who knows what they are doing/ can dyno a auto car. Otherwise you might as well squiggle lines on a page.

Re cam chain, I believe there is a self tensioner in there. It's not a service item, if it has stretched it'll skip a few teeth and destroy your motor. Don't think it's going to be that mate. Doesn't lead to a loss of power, just catastrophic failure like a cam belt.

Go back to the place and ask for another dyno set up properly, at a discounted rate. I mean it even says 4wd vehicle at the top of the page ffs.

Cheers I think I'll try a different tuner as although the tuner who ran this dyno is highly respected in his field it might be time to try another.

I think he did the dyno in 1st and 2nd due to it being an auto.

A guy on SDU mentioned it could be a case of the timing chain actually stretching and that this was a common fault on the VQ25DD and the VQ30DD. Has anyone here had that issue?

If your chain has stretched or the tensioner has failed your engine will have the death rattles. It wont change power output though.

Why are you so hung up on the figure? Dyno outputs are so easy to fudge it's a joke. Be happy it's all running smooth and gets you around, it will never be a race car.

If your chain has stretched or the tensioner has failed your engine will have the death rattles. It wont change power output though.

Death rattles?, would this sound like a misfire and would it be constant or intermittent?

Why are you so hung up on the figure? Dyno outputs are so easy to fudge it's a joke. Be happy it's all running smooth and gets you around, it will never be a race car.

Oh I'm aware it will never be a race car but I'd like a base figure as I do plan on doing some basic mods as mentioned earlier in the thread.

If the base figure isn't a true reading then as mentioned by PN-Mad "You might as well be looking at squiggly lines on a page".

Its unusual here to do anything to a V35 or Stagea so I want to be different and I'm sure you can understand that as your build on a Stagea is amazing and but also very thinking outside the box.

Cheers

Hey Dion! Here's what we need to do! Meet up for a comparo. Find a 'private road' and line up for a test!! :yes:

My 300 stag feels plenty healthy so it should give you a reasonable benchmark. It's well serviced by City Nissan Takapuna and goes better than the SV6 I had before. If it's close then your ok. They probably weight about the same...haven't checked lately but I think mine's about 1550kg. You should have a slight edge if all is well.

Hey Mike

That sounds like a good idea. If you want you can take mine for a spin and see how you think it compares

Send me PM with your contact details and we'll sort something out

I can't believe no ones mentioned that f**ked up torque curve, or slope i should say... max torque right at the start of the run?

Dyno is definitely set up wrong.

its probably more accurate to take your car to the drag strip, have 3-5 runs, get an average ET and trap speed then use a few equations to estimate power, rather than comparing dyno figures. You may not know exactly how much power your car makes, but you will know how fast it is :)

that's totally wrong mate. I do have the same car 2001 300GT, and they do a lot better than that. Well it might be 185 rather than 85kw. When I went to Tasmania, I gave it a go and the car hit 180km/h and it was like driving at 100km/h. It was still speeding up. So what i'm trying to say is, this car with this engine and the design would do way better than that.

Ask them to do it again (for free) and do it appropriately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...