Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just found out that the law doesn't require me to have a cat. so I've decided to get some pipe and make a few flanges. Anything to look out for when i'm doing this? i know there's currently a temp sensor but i just want to cable tie it out of the way for now.

Also, will this give the car a better sound? as it already has a nismo 3" exhaust. is the cat holding me back from a better note?

Cheers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsIrz_LaHdo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406140-de-cat-advice/
Share on other sites

Pretty sure the law says you need a cat !! If the car came from oem that way , your not going to feel a lot of power over a hiflow car , only noise that makes it sound faster

A decrease if your cat expands pipe goes from 2.5 ,3 to 5in the air turbulence actually makes less power

Plus smells like hell to idle

The fine is huge if your not running a cat or shop removes it for street use

After running no cat on NA rx7 for 11 yrs except for 15 min california style emissions test only to remove it again , on that full race motor i noticed it a lot but the factory intakes etc had to be put back on to pass too and a bottle of emmisions pass junk poured into the tank for the test on bridgeport motor

Its not worth it buy a 100cell for 200 bucks which is sorta legal anyway

Can be drone at speed which is super annoying

My 2 c

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406140-de-cat-advice/#findComment-6471385
Share on other sites

I gutted my 3" cat and felt and heard no difference. Kakimoto 3" exhaust.

But there was the occasional bang of a back fire changing gears or just backing off the accelerator.

And yeah I'm pretty sure by law you need to run a cat. I think if the car is pre '85 (or somewhere around there) then no hotdog or cat required, just mufflers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406140-de-cat-advice/#findComment-6471431
Share on other sites

Carbon 34,

OP is from NZ - cats are not a requirement there, I'm lead to believe.

I thought the same thing, but I believe this has been revised.

http://www.transport.govt.nz/legislation/Vehicle-Emissions-Questions-and-Answers/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406140-de-cat-advice/#findComment-6472514
Share on other sites

Cheers for the input, the car is registered as a special interest vehicle (used to exempt cars from NZ regulations on frontal impact and emissions) which the R32 GTR classes as.

The car sounds quite droney already and it does occasionally spit when on the overrun and changing gears, see what the story is on the weekend.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406140-de-cat-advice/#findComment-6472518
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...