Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey

Why does the XR6 Turbo have such a small intercooler?

is it because Ford doesnt want people to buy the cheaper XR6 Turbo, and have it with more power than the more expensive XR8?

or does it have to do more with the internals/drivetrain/gearbox not being able to handle the power?

thanks

Tharaka

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40863-xr6-turbo-question/
Share on other sites

in a way yes. those cars come out the factory running low boost(5psi??) and were slightly detuned so the xr8 would still b the 'godzilla' of the xr range, lower boost means no need for big cooler unless the customer wants it, if thats the case its up to the customer to replace with bigger cooler. most xr6 owners wouldnt want to ruin their warranty by boosting it or modding it and/or have little desire to turn it into a 13(or 12) second beast. would still prefer a r34 or s15 over it. on a side note, the internals and drivetrain are not weak, i havent heard good things about the gerabox though

They are fairly crazy on rolling starts, pulled nxt to a turbo ute presumably with atleast chiptorque etc floored it and he was just pulling slowly away.

I wasnt driving at the time tho so couldnt judge properly, Either way a 4L turbo cant be underestimated.. except for the 1600-1700 weight

probably due to the bigger capacity engine and lower boost there is less requirement for a bigger cooler than on a smaller capacity engine. I assume the turbo is bigger and therefore running the lower boost it doesn't build as much temperature back into the engine. Also the compression ratio is probably fairly detonation friendly for aussie conditions. Ford engines are generally pretty strong -- even the old ones. Most of the 80's falcons you can strap a turbo kit onto without massive dramas, whereas most of the commodores need more internal work.

...and probably most importantly to them: smaller = cheaper :(

As I understand it the XR6T is marginal on cooling as it is, so blocking the radiator with a big FMIC is a problem. This would explain why people are working on Water-Air intercoolers from them...

My friend is working on the FPV F6 Typhoon testing so I probably should ask him if that is right. I reckon they should make a Z-tune style bonnet from an XR8 bonnet :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...