Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I didnt do it myself but the guy who i bought it off. Everything seems fine with the engine, but the car is running way too rich...so much smoke and smell.The engine is running low compression pistons since its was originally a rb20det. What can i do? put non turbo injectors and/or change the fuel pump?

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Injectors etc probably arent going to help, more likely an ECU will...... But i must ask WHY did he remove the turbo? The RB20DET - T would be terrible to drive? (No offense)

Injectors etc probably arent going to help, more likely an ECU will...... But i must ask WHY did he remove the turbo? The RB20DET - T would be terrible to drive? (No offense)

crap power low end but it picks up like a skyline should after like 5500rpm. BTW i think there is already an ecu..u cant just take the turbo off and expect your car to run...it wont!

crap power low end but it picks up like a skyline should after like 5500rpm. BTW i think there is already an ecu..u cant just take the turbo off and expect your car to run...it wont!

Oh it'll run just fine.

Might be a lil' rich though.

an NA that piks up after 5500. Far out. your on p's by the sound of it?

the only money id spend on that is to get a rb25de and bolt in.

you think there is an ECU? is this car on bricks?

go fist yourself, i want to drive a non turbo r32, f**k me right? i dont care ive been looking for a factory gts for a while now and most of them are either auto or are really expensive. They are rare...more and more r32's are off the street nowadays. The car drives fine, it just runs rich.

You said its got a non turbo computer? What colour are the injectors? pink or red?

Also a rooted o2 sensor will cause this.

injectors are greyish black

here's a picture of the ecu...it looks aftermarket : http://imgur.com/2UWCH

injectors are greyish black

here's a picture of the ecu...it looks aftermarket : http://imgur.com/2UWCH

Looks like the NISTUNE logo and Envy Dyno.......

Looks like the NISTUNE logo and Envy Dyno.......

ye i told you it had an different computer

id also like to mention im still using the factory turbo manifold...its been modified to go straight to the dump pipe. Maybe its a bit restrictive? getting different headers will be one of the first mods id do.

go fist yourself, i want to drive a non turbo r32, f**k me right? i dont care ive been looking for a factory gts for a while now and most of them are either auto or are really expensive. They are rare...more and more r32's are off the street nowadays. The car drives fine, it just runs rich.

haha, hit a sore point did i mate?

Sorry, your car is not rare. But... What you could do.Is grab a NA rb25de for Say $500, Bolt it in. Not only will you have a stock DE motor, But will be able to enjoy the extra .5 Lt. Win win is it not?

Otherwise you could spend money on what you currently have....And still be drving around in a low comp 2L NA

Edited by sydking

haha, hit a sore point did i mate?

Sorry, your car is not rare. But... What you could do.Is grab a NA rb25de for Say $500, Bolt it in. Not only will you have a stock DE motor, But will be able to enjoy the extra .5 Lt. Win win is it not?

Otherwise you could spend money on what you currently have....And still be drving around in a low comp 2L NA

and pay thousands to get it engineered? no thanks bro

Edited by IM-32-FK

Definetly buy a rb25de motor, cheap as compared to fixing yours to run properly as will only take a day to fit of you have some knowledge. Also will go way quicker than what's in there now

Hmmm, you should watch what you are talking about. As for his suggestion of putting a proper non turbo motor in there is the smartest decision you will ever make.

As for why your car is running shit? Its because the turbo is missing doofus. And want to know another thing? Your non turbo'd car is still illegal for you to drive on your p's because it was registered as a turbo.

So instead of spitting in people's faces like a spoilt brat, just take what he says and reply in a manner as follows, no thank you, I would rather try something else

and pay thousands to get it engineered? no thanks bro

lol u driving a non turbo 4 wheel drive r33 ROFL what a joke why bother having 4 wheel drive when your car dont even have power lolololololol

Doesn't need to be engineered as its a factory motor designed for that chassis. Also awd helps heaps in wet, I know my rwd r33 has stepped a few times when you don't want it to.

Also, what's with the attitude, why bother asking for help of your not going to take it positively

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...