Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive got a 32 gtst, and about 4-5 grand to spend on it. just wondering if the guys puttin big turbos on the rb20s are replacing piston rings (or pistons) when they do this? Beacause im thinking if i have to do rings/pistons, turbo, cooler, ecu, and fuel system would i be better off selling the engine and putting in the 2.5lt. or should i go rb30 bottom end with my rb20 head for the extra torque, does anyone know how much machining is involved in fitting the head and who does it (sydney area) just want to get as much feedback as i can before spending the dosh. anyone who has done mods on a similar budget let me know what you did and how it worked out. thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41139-rb20-5000-what-to-do/
Share on other sites

The head does fit, but major mods are needed. A 25de head fits on a 30 block rather sweetly with only drilling for a pulley tensioner needed. I would use the money and get a 25, i myself have a rb20 and would kill to put a 25 in. But a rb30DET would be rather nice, and for 5 grand you might be able to do it, depends on the internals coz the block should only cost $50 to $100 and a rb25 no more that $1000. My friend is doing this and putting it into his EH holden.

well it would cost you $5000 to put in a 2.5 but then you would still have a standard engine not puting out alot of power.

I guess the question comes down to whether you plan to make further modifications. If you only want to spend $5000 and leave it at that, you may find you will get more power by modifying the RB20. rather than having to buy and install an RB25, as you wont have alot of change after the conversion.

However if you plan to perform further mods, having the 2.5 will be a great advantage...

what are your plans with the car?

The head does fit, but major mods are needed. A 25de head fits on a 30 block rather sweetly with only drilling for a pulley tensioner needed. I would use the money and get a 25, i myself have a rb20 and would kill to put a 25 in. But a rb30DET would be rather nice, and for 5 grand you might be able to do it, depends on the internals coz the block should only cost $50 to $100 and a rb25 no more that $1000. My friend is doing this and putting it into his EH holden.

An RB20 has 78mm bores (from memory), and a Rb30 has 86mm bores. That must be major mods to make it fit considering it wont go on....

:Oops:

Assuming your RB20 is completely std, the $5,000 will get it singing, may need a few extra $$$ for things like clutch etc though, but for engine mods, 220-230rwkws and 12sec qtr times is achievable with 5k,

I wouldnt bother with an RB25 or RB30, unless you were chasing +300rwkws

So does anyone think at 170,000kms std RB20 with aftermarket turbo can make 240rwkws with boost in by 4,500rpm???

All that money to have a std Rb25, doesnt make sense?

Especially when my std Rb20 with std turbo with an IC/ filter wasnt getting left behind by R33s with the same modes on the straights at Eastern Creek, actually none of them pulled away from me, a few i use to even catch up a little. (yes i know about weight etc etc)

Im about the only one who seems to think the Rb20 can get the job done. My Rb20 hasnt melted a piston, with plenty of sustained hard driving under its belt. Not saying its the greatest setup around, but ppl spend so much money on starting with another blank canvas, when that money coudl go to making the RB20 haul the mail

r33 heavier than r32.

RB25 is a canvas with alot more potential, more off boost reponce etc.

For his $5k budget he's better off with a reliable streetable package like an Rb25(even stock) over a tickled RB20.

I made 306rwhp on an RB20 on a budget was fun etc but off boost like most RB20's its a pain. I'd of rather saved money

rb20s are a very tough engine i tried and couldnt brake mine, so for up to 230-240rwkw with a 2530 or trust t51xx setup they are very goo and while lacking a little down low will rev to 8k all day. and cheap so if it breaks drop another in.

for 5k you should if spent carefull fit a cooler, turbo, exh, fuel pump, injectors and get it remapped to suit, for 5k you will be lucky to fit a std rb25 engine, so if 10 was the budget then its a diff story

First i'd get your current engine checked out, ie compression test and leak down test at the least to see if it's still healthy. If so then keep it.

For about 5 to 5.5k you can get turbo, intercooler, full exhaust, Injectors, pod filter and Remap of the stock ecu, should make over 200rwkw easily. Then you'd need a clutch and afm upgrade and another tune and you could make closer to 230rwkw

5k for an engine swap that will make you maybe 150rwkw without mods and it doesn't really compare. Though if you plan on going further then it may be worth while, particularly if your existing engine is a bit shagged.

r33 heavier than r32.

RB25 is a canvas with alot more potential, more off boost reponce etc.

For his $5k budget he's better off with a reliable streetable package like an Rb25(even stock) over a tickled RB20.

I made 306rwhp on an RB20 on a budget was fun etc but off boost like most RB20's its a pain. I'd of rather saved money

I have been in a couple of std turbo R33s, and whilst they do have good response down low, they dont exactly have much top end. Not saying the engine are no good, but given a 5k budget i wouldnt even look at any other motor then whats in the car.

My thinking is :

- 2nd hand Jap 3" exhaust : $1,000 fitted

- Hybrid I/c : $900 fitted

- Air filter : $200 fitted

- 2nd hand Boost controller : $500 fitted

- clutch and flywheel : $1300 fitted

- Fuel pump : $300 fitted

So for a little over 4 grand you would have an engine working better, not harder.

I wouldnt bother with re-writing the ECU, even though there are power gains to be had. The car will go a lot better then std...if you want to make more power, well from here on in its a matter of selecting a turbo and re-writing the ECU.

If you can install stuff yourself, then there is more money to spend and could strectch the budget to an unloved HKS 2510/2530 T3/4 with rising rate regulator and a re-written ECU.

thanks for all the help guys. thinking about my budget i might as well stick with the rb20, i just didnt want to do the mods and have the bottom end shit itself. my motor has 115000kms on it and when i got the car it was boosting to 15psi so i thought the rings may/should be replaced. What i want from the car is a daily driver that can still manage consistent low 13s (and i do rack up the kms) Are these engines as bulletproof as everyone makes them out to be. I guess its all in the tuning. should i go for an aftermarket ecu straight up and save the hassel later? i dont want anything overly powerfull cause then the rest of the drive-line suffers (trans,diff,driveshafts,ect) just want to blow a v8 every now and then.

My car has 170,000kms, with over 3,000kms on the track. The last 20,000kms have been with a hillbilly tune with aftermarket turbo, an the engine lives, even though some say it shouldnt have. The engine has even had about 6-8excursions past 9,000rpm with an ecu that was on it for about 2 months.

By improving the effeciancy of the engine, you arent rally making it work that much harder, its not like if you have a 40% increase in power, the engine is working 40% harder.

If your budget was 15k, id agree with everyone and boat anchor the RB20, but at 5k Rb20s are good toys.

why drop in an rb25 when the two have similar potential on the std bottom end (the 20 a safe 300rwhp, the 25 a safe 350rwhp) doing similar mods. Just end up spending all that cash for a motor that has limited advantages over that which you started with. If it dies, rather than rebuilding the 20 grab a stuffed 25 to rebuild instead, which would be a much better proposition with forgies. If you know from the start your going to want over 400hp dont bother with either and start saving for the 26 straight away

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...