Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest INASNT

I need a few calculations which i could do myself but i cbf getting out notes or books to work em out.

Questions :

If u were travelling at 130km/h for 800m how long (seconds) would it take to travel that distance?

How long would it take to come to a complete stop from 130km/h and how many meters to stop in a normal VT commodore V6?

How many seconds would a VT commodore exec take to accelerate to 130km/h and and how many meters would it take for it get to 130km/h?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41150-questions-for-the-maths-gurus/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yes you could work out the stopping distance/time but there are many things that are required, weight, brake size, caliper dimensions, brake pad material and others as well i think, not worth the effort really

same for the acceleration, many factors that affect the time and probably wouldnt be overly accurate

Guest Munky

22.153846...... seconds to go 800 metres

To do this just work out how many metres per second the car is travelling at (its speed / 3.6)

Then divide 800 by the figure you get from the above calculation.

Basically its just a case of manipulating the simple identity

Velocity = Distance / Time once you get the velocity in m/s

its pretty hard to do the acceleration question without some figures to go with it (ill look for some)

Guest Munky

How many seconds would a VT commodore exec take to accelerate to 130km/h and and how many meters would it take for it get to 130km/h?

Using the figures of a supercharged 5.7L V8 Commie VT (So it's inaccurate - I couldnt find figures for the one u specified)

Assuming it accelerates at constant acceleration, and using the figure of 5.89s 0-100kph

v = u + at

0 = 100 + 5.89a

therefore a = approx. 17 km/s

So now using v = u + at again

130 = 0 + 17t

therefore t = about 7.64 seconds

Now just doing a simple calculation of distance travelled = 1/2vt

The distance travelled is about 138 metres

I think that should be right but I havent done any mechanics/physics questions for about 7 months (since I finished hsc) It sounds right though (at least for a supercharged 5.7L v8)

I think you'll find that you can't do the stopping question without a figure on the deceleration figures of a commie.

Guest Munky

If u go by 1/4 times for a exec commo dont they do 16 in the 1/4, but at what speed?

It's almost impossible to figure this out because once your doing 100km/h obviously your car won't accelerate at the same rate as it was for 0 - 100. So its speed might only increase by 40km/h in the last 10 seconds of the 16 secs (as opposed to the 100 km/h it increased in the first 5.98 seconds if ur using the supercharged specs)

That's why the original calculation probably isnt very accurate either, since I just took the average rate of acceleration and assumed it was constant for the entire 0 - 100 (then kept assuming it was constant till 130km/h) In reality it would take longer since the car won't increase in speed as quickly as it did off the mark (ie. the rate of acceleration will drop so that the rate of acceleration by 130km/h is no longer 17km/s^2)

Someone get clocked by a NON-RADAR-EQUIPPED police vehicle huh?

Sounds like you're trying to work out if they were following you for long enough to get an accurate guesstimation of your vehicles speed... That and they must have been going in the other direction when they saw you...

Am I close?

Good luck dude.

Adrian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hang on. Let me get this straight. The desire is to have coilovers, BC in particular, to be MORE comfortable on Sydney roads than stock suspension? Well, that's obviously not right. BCs have crude damping design at the very best, and typically hard spring rates. BC stands for Billy Cart. And then, the desire is to put in some shitty old worn out stockers, to get it blue slipped and then put the BCs back in? And then.....what? Not worry about getting pulled up by the Plod? Because you seem to have raised a worry about paying for engineering (which actually does solve all your legality problems) and still getting pulled up.... but the only problem there is that if/when that happens you have to show your paperwork at the inspection station. Whereas, if you just swap in borrowed shitty old stockers to get it slipped now, and then you get defected in the future, you have to go find more shitty old stockers then too. You course of action looks like this set of options: Buy brand new stock type dampers, and springs. probably cost a bit more than $1k all up, but will last for the remaining life of the car. Put them in, pass inspection, drive on them forever more. Hell, they could even be really nice Bilsteins and Kings or other lower&stiffer springs if you wanted. Get the car engineered as is. ~$1k. Buy new Shockworks coilvers (or MCA) and also pay for engineering. You're spending a lot more here. But these will be the best things that you could drive around on.
    • Might be worthwhile hitting up Facebook's groups, I know most of them contain terrible people and scammers - however you might be able to find someone that's in Sydney with factory suspension you could purchase and/or hire. Just do not send any form of money anywhere, in person cash only.
    • Thanks @Duncan Ride height is fine. I think it's almost stock tbh. Happy to share a pic. I don't actually have a regular mechanic as haven't lived in Sydney too long. Could you or anyone recommend any shops in Sydney?
    • You just need a different blue slip shop (preferably one you regularly use as a mechanic), and make sure the coil overs are as close as possible to standard height
    • yeah the sugar refining companies were pushing for the same in Oz originally, all fuels were going to have 10% ethanol to make them "cheaper" (noting, that the loss in l/100 might be greater than the decrease in price). I guess they won that fight in Canadia
×
×
  • Create New...