Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They do self learn fast, but that wouldn't help much with cold starts as the widebands aren't very accurate initially.

Holden were still using the Continental ethanol sensors until recently, when they ditched flex fuel. I am getting a free sensor from one of the Holden design techs as he has no use for it anymore.

When I was tuned on e70 a few years ago I used to fill at the Powerplus e85 pump and add 6L or so to the mix to keep the wideband happy. It just becomes a pain in the arse, better to tune on e85 and run a little rich on the e70 if you use it.

We don't have United E85 in Hobbitville yet but there are two Eflex outlets so that's what I run . For street only I think Eflex is a little more user friendly in some ways and still better turbo tucker than 98 PULP .

A while back a few here did tests to show the power difference between E70 and E85 but I can't remember if it was that much of a difference . Someone else said recently that the knock resistance with ethanol flattens out at about 40-50% so if that's true the benefit of more must be extra evaporative charge cooling .

That aside I didn't realise the General had given up on flex fuel and it would be interesting to know why .

A .

  • Like 1

Because it's shit fuel for a low compression NA V8, as long as they try to make the engine compatible with 91, it will never run well on ethanol imo, not without bumping the compression or charging. Economy was down 30% with no real power gains. The bogan crowd have always been against ethanol in their fuel so don't care if it's dropped, and with Caltex trying to get out of their contract, Holden would know flex fuel is dead in the water here. Only GM US were pushing them to use it, for the green aspect.

I have done power back to back tests between the brands, there was only 4kw in it. I will be filling on eflex in Canberra soon, apparently there is an airport run coming up and I want to see what the wagon can do when I stretch her legs. ;)

I agree , any engine built and tuned to run low octane fuel never gained anything out of better juice and went backwards on alcohol fuels consumption wise . The sad fact is that Joe Average buys the cheapest fuel he can get and the manufacturers are well aware of it .

It's beyond the scope of this thread but IMO the sooner we get a consistent lower blend like 25 to 40% the less the general public would fear ethanol . Most people I speak to , performance people aside , tell me how it burns out your seals and engine and are aghast when I tell them about using 70% for long enough to know better .

The problem is that people know that E10 is cheap and not very fuel efficient and assume if 10% is bad more must be worse . The other sad fact is that EPAs the world over wanted Ethanol (E10) for failed f**kwit green reasons and all it ever did was make in theory emissions content look a smidge cleaner .

I don't see too many manufacturers lining up to make E100 engines and as long as ULP engines are the norm you'll always get a consumption penalty burning high ethanol blend fuels . To get the best of both for volume sales setting the bar at the effective knock limit percentage means better consumption per litre and that's the thing people care most about .

With E85, the closest United to me that sells it is Dee Why. That's still about 20-25 minutes from my place. I'm wondering how long you can keep fuel sitting around in drums before it absorbs too much water? Or if you have it sealed is it pretty much a non-issue?

I also have a 200L drum under the house I could clean out and use with a hand pump but I'm not sure how well I could seal it.

Tuner mentioned that as more water enters the fuel, the octane number drops slightly potentially causing det for an entire drum of fuel. He also mentioned something about people having rusted injectors from it in cases where the car isn't driven more than once a fortnight etc. I'm not worried about that personally just curious if anyone has heard of anything. Thanks

Edited by Blackkers

If it's a daily it won't be an issue.

I used to use a 220L drum, I filled it with 20psi air pressure to pump the fuel out a servo style nozzle, it filled the car tank in no time. You are welcome to it if you are local, I now just use the low 20L red Bunnings drums as they are easier to transport.

It will keep fine if in a sealed container.

  • 2 weeks later...

Things are looking like changing in America with ethanol fuel blends and there is a push to introduce E15 for cars made from/after 2oo1 - or was it 2007 ? I think the corn growers want to expand ethanol production which means introducing blends greater than 10% .

Real world I think the problem is that E10 is made with ~ 90% piss grade ULP and all the 10% ethanol content does is make many engines run leaner . In other words there isn't enough ethanol in it to raise the octane rating to the point where knock sensors stay dormant and not cause the system to retard the ignition timing . More ethanol ie 15%+ can raise the octane rating of 91ULP but it seems you need a computer smart enough to compensate for the leaner AFR .

I did find a few reports OS showing how some blends in the E20-E30 range can match and sometimes very slightly better consumption compared to 91 ULP .

There was another interesting fact that the oil co's are blending the ethanol and then setting the price of blended fuels meaning they are controlling the consumer price of the ethanol content which is a rort . Ethanol is shit loads cheaper to produce than ULP but to look at the price of E70/85 on the pumps you wouldn't think so . It's a shame independents can't source bulk ethanol and buy/blend ULP at reasonable rates to reduce the end price for us . Obviously the oil co's see ethanol as a threat and given a choice there wouldn't be any in fuel at all .

I hope that E15-25 blends become available here and someone with enough of a public following can prove that there is no disadvantage in using it in cars made in the last 7-10 years . Joe average still thinks ethanol burns out the seals in his engine killing it but who's ever seen that happen ?

I think we are going to have to stand up for ethanol blends of which E10 is a waste of time . The main stream is clearly not interested in E70-85 because the cost of motoring is their main concern and at those levels there's nothing in it for them with engines optimised for 91-95 ULP . Main stream sales ultimately make or break any products success and ethanols survival will depend on govt legislation , read green slime garbage , and possibly low to mid percentage blends if they are cost effective for Joe average .

Quick question regarding "e85". Is it always going to be the same amount of ethanol? I've read that you can get varying degrees of ethanol content from the same supplier. I know Shell sells E70 and United sells E85 I'm talking variance within the brand. Also if I ask the guy at the counter is there any chance he would know the exact content?

I'd only really want to know when tuning initially so that I don't tune on E70 thinking its E85 then one day run E90. I know an ethanol tune isn't particularly sensitive and I've got a wideband for security but I'd still rather know than find out later.

Also if I tune on E85 then fill up with shell E70, yes rich is safe but won't I potentially lose some knock protection? or does the tuner account for this and bring timing back from the edge slightly?

Quick question regarding "e85". Is it always going to be the same amount of ethanol? I've read that you can get varying degrees of ethanol content from the same supplier. I know Shell sells E70 and United sells E85 I'm talking variance within the brand. Also if I ask the guy at the counter is there any chance he would know the exact content?

I'd only really want to know when tuning initially so that I don't tune on E70 thinking its E85 then one day run E90. I know an ethanol tune isn't particularly sensitive and I've got a wideband for security but I'd still rather know than find out later.

Also if I tune on E85 then fill up with shell E70, yes rich is safe but won't I potentially lose some knock protection? or does the tuner account for this and bring timing back from the edge slightly?

Shell sells e85 now?

Get a tune on United, then run whatever you like. Safe as houses.

Am I thinking caltex or shell? Who other than united sells a high ethanol content fuel in Sydney? and is it essentially the same as united e85?

I can't wait to tune for e85 just have to sort out a solid intake, bigger injectors, fuel pump then i'll be knocking the tuners door down

Edited by Blackkers

United have brought out and app that lets uses your location to tell you the closest service stations and the cost for the day, and of course which fuels they have on site...

I searched "united" in the app store..

Happy Days :yes:

So my understanding of this thread is that this fuel isn't recommended for non daily driven cars?

My cars lucky to be driven once a month sometimes, would this cause the fuel to go off?

So my understanding of this thread is that this fuel isn't recommended for non daily driven cars?

My cars lucky to be driven once a month sometimes, would this cause the fuel to go off?

huh? Heaps of track and drift cars run it.

Edited by superben

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...